Page 1 of 1

Favorite text editor/IDEs?

Posted: 2003-09-27 08:58pm
by Pu-239
In descending order:
Eclipse
.
.
.
SciTE
nano
KATE
Emacs (never used XEmacs)
Quanta Plus
JEdit
.
.
pNotepad
.
.
.
.
.
MSVC IDE- forgot details about it... since it's not VB, better than what's below.
MSVB IDE- would be above nano if it wasn't MS and VB... or maybe not, since the only good thing about it is the GUI builder, and that's not text editing.
.
.
Notepad
.
GVim
.
.
.
vi
.
.
.
ed- never used it, but line editing has got to be horrible


It's in order of actual usefulness and preference, since for example, anything slightly worse than SciTE will score lower than nano, since I use nano for console editing, and so another inferior graphical editor is useless.

Posted: 2003-09-27 09:25pm
by Dalton
metapad

Posted: 2003-09-27 09:35pm
by kojikun
Paper and pencil. :P

In Windows I use notepad for plaintext stuff like HTML, as well as for PHP programs; DevC++ for C++ editting.

Posted: 2003-09-28 12:49am
by GrandMasterTerwynn
In UNIX/Linux -- pico . . . it's stupid it's simple. I like stupid and simple. Certainly better than either emacs or vi from that viewpoint (both requiring the memorization of horrible and insane key combinations.) Although emacs in it's GUI form is pretty damned nice.

Windows -- notepad or wordpad. Stupid and simple. I like simple and stupid.

Posted: 2003-09-28 12:58am
by Darth Wong
KWrite and vi. Like it or not, vi is available on every UNIX system in the world, and is good enough for quickly fixing conf files in text mode. Very handy when you need to ssh into somebody's server and edit some files.

Posted: 2003-09-28 01:00am
by SirNitram
I'm a windows user; I use Notepad.

However, for all my UNIX needs, I have become proficient in vi. It's really quite handy, once you get the hang of it.

Posted: 2003-09-28 01:00am
by Pu-239
I'm a big fan of lots of features. AFAIK nano is supposed to be a GPLed pico clone, with optional highlighting and various other features you can activate.

Emacs is ok, you can memorize them after awhile. The problem is that I forgot the keys, since I never use it due to longer loading time than nano. Used to use it for awhile, since it was the only editor I had on LFS that didn't insert hard line breaks other than vi, to type up homework. Now of course I use OO.
Vi is just horrible.

Posted: 2003-09-28 01:24am
by phongn
TeXnicCenter for LaTeX typesetting on Windows. GEdit for text editing on Linux, though I also use nano.

Posted: 2003-09-28 02:43am
by Sarevok
MS VC6 IDE is the best. Too bad they replaced it with VC.net one.

Posted: 2003-09-28 11:22am
by Drooling Iguana
I use NEdit for most heavy tasks, and Joe for when I want to quickly edit a file in console mode.

Posted: 2003-09-28 01:08pm
by Durandal
For a command-line editor, pico is the finest.
For a GUI editor, I like BBEdit, and love JEdit.
XCode is an excellent IDE all around. It makes file navigation within a project very easy.
For LaTeX, iTeXMac is superb in terms of features and interface. The only problem is that its syntax-coloring code is slower than shit, which makes editing a very sluggish experience.

Posted: 2003-09-28 02:09pm
by Pu-239
Darth Wong wrote:KWrite and vi. Like it or not, vi is available on every UNIX system in the world, and is good enough for quickly fixing conf files in text mode. Very handy when you need to ssh into somebody's server and edit some files.
Hehe, my system doesn't have vi installed. I used to use it. For some reason, there was a time which I thought emacs was a lot harder than vi though... after not using vi for awhile, being spoiled by nano I have completely forgotten how to use vi, and I'm not willing to learn.

BTW, KATE is simply kwrite embedded with a file manager, mulitiple document interface, and a console.


Hehe, it's actually possible to edit text using only dd, echo, and cat in case you want to avoid vi at all costs.


Yay. I now have a rudimentary knowledge of ed. Looks like it's even easier than vi. Maybe have to move it up on list

Posted: 2003-09-28 03:21pm
by Slartibartfast
For Windows, if you don't want to use Micro$hit stuff, but still want some good functionality (and built-in package support for stuff like gcc and wxwindows), you can get Dev-C++. Besides, the company is called Bloodshed Software. Who wouldn't like a program made by a company called bloodshed.

Posted: 2003-09-28 04:17pm
by Howedar
I like Wordpad.

Posted: 2003-09-28 04:25pm
by Shinova
I use Microsoft Word



*runs away*

Posted: 2003-09-28 08:03pm
by Durandal
Shinova wrote:I use Microsoft Word

*runs away*
That's not text editing; it's word processing.

Posted: 2003-09-28 08:11pm
by Keevan_Colton
I tend to use notepad, but that's simply because its handy and I tend to just want to "jot down" things and keep them safe.....

Posted: 2003-09-28 08:51pm
by Symmetry
I usually use notepad on windows and emacs on unix, but that might just be bacause I haven't had experience with better things. Still, you only ask so much of a text editor.

Posted: 2003-09-28 11:57pm
by Durandal
Symmetry wrote:I usually use notepad on windows and emacs on unix, but that might just be bacause I haven't had experience with better things. Still, you only ask so much of a text editor.
When you do serious work, you ask a lot of a text editor. Being able to use regular expressions for search and replace, for example.

Posted: 2003-09-29 02:39am
by StimNeuro
I personally like Textpad. Usable to open nearly any file, like notepad, and has Java extensions(Compile, Run, Run Applet).

Posted: 2003-09-29 05:08am
by Crazy_Vasey
PFE, Dev C++, and vi are the three I use most.