Netscape vs. Mozilla
Posted: 2003-10-26 03:43pm
I use Netscape was my browser now but I'm thinking about switching to Mozilla. Which of the two is better?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=32755
Firebird is Mozilla stripped of non-browser components -- in other words, no mail, newsgroup, composer, or IRC clients. It runs significantly faster due to the loss of bloat, and is recommended if you don't use anything but the browser itself. Mozilla itself is heading for complete separation of its components in the 2.0 version, and Firebird is the start of this.observer_20000 wrote:BTW, perhaps I'm just a bit obtuse, or too lazy to figure it out for myself, but what are the differences between Mozilla and FireBird?
And Thunderbird continues it, though I do hope they enable that profile migration soon.Datana wrote:Firebird is Mozilla stripped of non-browser components -- in other words, no mail, newsgroup, composer, or IRC clients. It runs significantly faster due to the loss of bloat, and is recommended if you don't use anything but the browser itself. Mozilla itself is heading for complete separation of its components in the 2.0 version, and Firebird is the start of this.
Doesn't that come with ad banners?Datana wrote:Still not as fast as Opera, though, which is what I use.
The free version does.Dalton wrote:Doesn't that come with ad banners?
Hmm. One must wonder why one would pay for an ad-free browser when there's a damn good free one, sans adware, available elsewhere.observer_20000 wrote:The free version does.Dalton wrote:Doesn't that come with ad banners?
Huh? AOL uses IE for their browser and even stopped developing Netscape.Dalton wrote:
And, of course, there's the AOL slime that comes bundled with Netscape.
They're quite small and don't flash at you.Dalton wrote: Doesn't that come with ad banners?