Page 1 of 1
Need a REAL defragmenter
Posted: 2003-10-28 03:01am
by MKSheppard
I just spent six hours today waiting for the W2K defragger to defrag my
HDD, and tonight, I check out the HDD with the analyzer, and it says it's
30% fragmented already.
Ok, I need recommendations for a REAL defragger
Posted: 2003-10-28 03:12am
by Darth Wong
Win2k's defragger is serviceable. You just need to follow some basic rules:
- Don't keep your HD too full. You can't keep a HD defragged if it's 80% full. If you can't reduce your file load, get a bigger HD. If you can't do either, you're SOL.
- When you defrag, make sure you have nothing running. The more processes you have running, the more files the defragger won't be able to move. Shut down all resident processes that are not necessary, all system tray icons, all active applications, etc.
- Before defragging, go through and delete all unnecessary files such as IE temp files and cookies, Mozilla temp files and cookies, everything in your profile temp directory, etc.
Of course, the easy solution is to use a better filesystem, but you expressed unhappiness with Linux, so that's not an option
Posted: 2003-10-28 03:15am
by MKSheppard
Darth Wong wrote:
- Don't keep your HD too full. You can't keep a HD defragged if it's 80% full. If you can't reduce your file load, get a bigger HD. If you can't do either, you're SOL.
Problem is, I can't do that; fucking brother and his gigs upon gigs
of anime
I did delete over four gigs of crap I didn't need anymore. But I can't do
a total cleanout because of him
When you defrag, make sure you have nothing running. The more processes you have running, the more files the defragger won't be able to move. Shut down all resident processes that are not necessary, all system tray icons, all active applications, etc.
Nothing was running for six hours, man.
[*]Before defragging, go through and delete all unnecessary files such as IE temp files and cookies, Mozilla temp files and cookies, everything in your profile temp directory, etc.[/list]
I did that, and cleaned out my registry too.
Of course, the easy solution is to use a better filesystem, but you expressed unhappiness with Linux, so that's not an option
Linux was a good system, but I couldn't do everythin I need to do, for
example, there's no good reliable OCR software for linux, etc
Posted: 2003-10-28 03:53am
by Penguin
Think "norton systemworks"would do the trick...
Unfortunatly, it's NOT cheep...
Posted: 2003-10-28 11:34am
by phongn
NTFS does not defragment well when you start running low on space. The built-in defragmenter is about as good as you'll get - it's a licensed version of the Diskeeper engine. One thing you can attempt is to run the defragmenter multiple times.
One lesser-known fact is that the NT defragmenter can work even when processes are reading and writing to the HD (unlike W9X's defragmenter) due to the superiority of the NTFS filesystem over FAT. It's not as efficient, but it does work so you don't have to shut down every process you see.
AFAIK, no defragmenter will really work on NTFS if you start running low. I've used SystemWorks's defragmenter before, it didn't really work any better.
Posted: 2003-10-28 11:46am
by Yuri Prime
I have Norton 2002 and it tells me that XP has exclusive disk access. Is there anything I can do about that?
Posted: 2003-10-28 01:11pm
by phongn
Yuri Prime wrote:I have Norton 2002 and it tells me that XP has exclusive disk access. Is there anything I can do about that?
Don't use Norton's defragmenter.
Posted: 2003-10-28 01:24pm
by Companion Cube
Just out of curiousity, what does SOL stand for anyway?
Posted: 2003-10-28 01:39pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
MKSheppard wrote:Problem is, I can't do that; fucking brother and his gigs upon gigs of anime
I did delete over four gigs of crap I didn't need anymore. But I can't do a total cleanout because of him
Blow it up anyway! He needs his own computer to fuck up on anyway...
3rd Impact wrote:Just out of curiousity, what does SOL stand for anyway?
SOL=Shit Outta Luck. Basically the state you're in after any and all attempts to fix a problem have failed miserably and there are no more options left.
Posted: 2003-10-28 01:46pm
by phongn
3rd Impact wrote:Just out of curiousity, what does SOL stand for anyway?
Shit out of luck.
Posted: 2003-10-28 03:48pm
by Faram
phongn wrote:Don't use Norton's defragmenter.
I wold like to say: Don't use anything from Symantec.
Posted: 2003-10-28 05:43pm
by Atavarius
I have used diskeeper for sometime now.
Here.
Posted: 2003-10-28 06:01pm
by Faram
Oh btw:
Posted this
Tip a while back on how to defraggle your disk
Posted: 2003-10-28 06:37pm
by phongn
Atavarius wrote:I have used diskeeper for sometime now.
Here.
The W2K defragmentation engine is Diskeeper.
Posted: 2003-10-28 08:53pm
by Vertigo1
phongn wrote:Don't use Norton's defragmenter.
Why? I've had good luck with it in the past.
Posted: 2003-10-28 09:14pm
by BrYaN19kc
DISKEEPER by Executive Software is probably the best on the market and even recommended by Microsoft. We use it on all of our servers. The defrag program designed into Microsoft was made by Executive Software, but ti doesn't have all the bells and whistles of the real software.
Not only do we use it at our datacenter here on campus, I do know of several other universities and companies who use it as well. Executive Software has a very good reputation.