Page 1 of 2

FFXII unveiled

Posted: 2003-11-13 09:29pm
by Joe

Posted: 2003-11-13 09:33pm
by Trogdor
Interesting. I'll probably buy it when it comes out so long as it bears no resemblence to FF8.

Posted: 2003-11-13 10:12pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
http://newgrounds.com/portal/view.php?id=58184

I got reminded of that Flash instantly...

Posted: 2003-11-14 12:26am
by Durandal
Final Fantasy XII: Yeah We Made Another One. Coming next year!

Posted: 2003-11-14 12:27am
by Ghost Rider
Durandal wrote:Final Fantasy XII: Yeah We Made Another One. Coming next year!
shhh...you'll let the cat out of the bag.

Overall...looks like an advanced engine of FFX.

Right now...who knows.

www.rpgfan.com

Posted: 2003-11-14 01:09am
by The Penultimate Ninja
This game will be the best. It has pirates in it!

Posted: 2003-11-14 02:24am
by Vympel
Does Final Fantasy even have a coherent fucking plot?

Posted: 2003-11-14 02:27am
by Ghost Rider
Vympel wrote:Does Final Fantasy even have a coherent fucking plot?
You mean within a single game...or within the series?

As a single games...yes.

As a Series...nothing more then a name brand. Means as much to Square as Sprite does to Coca-Cola.

Posted: 2003-11-14 02:51am
by SPOOFE
Does Final Fantasy even have a coherent fucking plot?
From what I know, FF1, 4, 5, and 6 do. Haven't played the others in their entirety (still working on X, but I'll tell ya, so far it's been the typical Anime "Don't Question The Weird Shit" type of story, at least in the beginning hour... I guess the Japanese really like loose ends).

Posted: 2003-11-14 06:16am
by Sarevok
Where does the animated Final Fanatasy movie fit in ?

Posted: 2003-11-14 08:48am
by mauldooku
There is no continuity between the games. Until now, of course.

Posted: 2003-11-14 09:05am
by Vympel
Then why bother with "Final Fantasy" at all? Meh. Bah HUMBUG I say.

Posted: 2003-11-14 09:15am
by Darksider
Can somebody post details or PM them to me?
I can't get to the site. it keeps getting blocked.

(I'm on a school computer right now, they block jist about everything that has to do with games.)

Posted: 2003-11-14 11:53am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Vympel wrote:Then why bother with "Final Fantasy" at all? Meh. Bah HUMBUG I say.
Hironobu Sakaguchi called the first game "Final Fantasy" because he intended it to be the last game he produced before leaving the industry. It seems that he changed his mind after the game was released, but the name for the series stuck.

Posted: 2003-11-14 12:09pm
by Ghost Rider
Vympel wrote:Then why bother with "Final Fantasy" at all? Meh. Bah HUMBUG I say.
Because then they don't have to think up any other names. :P

I mean look how easy it is just to attach numbers.

Posted: 2003-11-14 04:05pm
by Darksider
Damn! They went for the whole "Era of swords and sorcery" thing again.

Ever since FF9 i was hoping they'd do another futuristic one.

Posted: 2003-11-14 04:28pm
by LordShaithis
Prawn's brief history of Square games:

Final Fantasy, NES - I rented this as a kid, was underwhelmed, and went back to playing the port of Ultima 3.

Final Fantasy II, SNES - Here's the one that really caught my attention, and made me aware of the Square name in particular.

Secret of Mana, SNES - Amusing, I thought at the time, but where the hell is my FF3 already? Bonus points for the downbeat ending.

Final Fantasy III, SNES - It was about goddamn time, and I was not disappointed. Narrowly defeated as Square's #1 game of all time by...

Chrono Trigger, SNES - Every console RPG in the universe can bow down and kiss this game's ass.

Final Fantasy VII, PS1 - You mean our FF3 was actually FF6? No wonder it took so long. Anyway, I played through this, but it just wasn't the same. It wasn't horrible, but I never played it through a second time, and never really had much enthusiasm for FF afterward.

Xenogears, PS1 - Ahahaha! Square has redeemed itself! This is awesome! Insert disc two? Okay... Egad, suddenly this blows! I quit.

Posted: 2003-11-14 05:22pm
by SirNitram
For once I'll agree with Prawn. I was massively underwhelmed by seven after playing 3/6. Then again, the real disappointment didn't come until 8. My god that one pissed me off.

Posted: 2003-11-14 06:45pm
by Durandal
Again, I stand as the sole person who really, really liked 8 because of its story and character development.

Posted: 2003-11-14 07:16pm
by SirNitram
Durandal wrote:Again, I stand as the sole person who really, really liked 8 because of its story and character development.
I kept getting distracted from the story by the incredible fucking tedium. I probably would have liked the plot if it wasn't such a mind-fuckingly slow-paced game.

Posted: 2003-11-14 07:41pm
by XaLEv
I liked 8, but it's been so long since I played it that I can't really remember how much.

I'll probably play it next, after I'm done with Tactics.

Posted: 2003-11-14 09:27pm
by Andrew J.
Badme wrote:There is no continuity between the games. Until now, of course.
I think all the FF games have a few things in common...like chocobos. I've heard they're in every game. And some character is, too...can't remember his name, but he's the one that swears a lot.

Posted: 2003-11-14 10:00pm
by Rye
Andrew J. wrote:
Badme wrote:There is no continuity between the games. Until now, of course.
I think all the FF games have a few things in common...like chocobos. I've heard they're in every game. And some character is, too...can't remember his name, but he's the one that swears a lot.
Woo! The oxymoronic titular game rolls ever forward!

Cid's in all of them. It'd be cool if in the final final fantasy it turns out that cid is a timelord or something and unites all the heroes for a multiverse-spanning be all and end all fantasy game.

Posted: 2003-11-14 10:39pm
by RedImperator
Andrew J. wrote:
Badme wrote:There is no continuity between the games. Until now, of course.
I think all the FF games have a few things in common...like chocobos. I've heard they're in every game. And some character is, too...can't remember his name, but he's the one that swears a lot.
Chocobos, Cid, and airships are the only common elements across all the games. Though they might have gotten away from the airships in the later installments. Airships, by the way, were just that: flying galleons and man-o-wars, either suspended by a big air sac like a blimp or giant propellers. FFII had the best take on the airship, where entire fleets of them had made regular ships mostly obsolete.

Posted: 2003-11-14 11:07pm
by LadyTevar
RedImperator wrote:
Andrew J. wrote:
Badme wrote:There is no continuity between the games. Until now, of course.
I think all the FF games have a few things in common...like chocobos. I've heard they're in every game. And some character is, too...can't remember his name, but he's the one that swears a lot.
Chocobos, Cid, and airships are the only common elements across all the games. Though they might have gotten away from the airships in the later installments. Airships, by the way, were just that: flying galleons and man-o-wars, either suspended by a big air sac like a blimp or giant propellers. FFII had the best take on the airship, where entire fleets of them had made regular ships mostly obsolete.
I dont' know.. I liked the Airships in FF9. Everybody had one that could fly on/over the Mists, but only two ships could fly without it, both of them 'Cid Specials'.

But yes, FFII you could do more with them, like use a wrench, or fly over lava. :)