Page 1 of 2

The new Winamp 5.01

Posted: 2003-12-28 03:10pm
by Hamel
Man, I tell ya, you'll need something better than a 1Ghz cpu to run this without crapping down your system~ Gobbled 50% of my processor

I like the modern 2.x style skin, but it doesn't let you detatch the EQ -.- cmon

I'm sticking with the unofficial 2.95 until I upgrade my pootar

Posted: 2003-12-28 03:18pm
by Faram
I have ditched winapm for iTunes mostly because the crapfilled Winamp 3

Posted: 2003-12-28 03:39pm
by The Cleric
MMJB all the way!!

Posted: 2003-12-28 03:46pm
by phongn
I'm wavering between Foobar2000 and Winamp 5 -- though WA5 using the classic skin isn't too bad.

Posted: 2003-12-28 04:03pm
by DPDarkPrimus
I haven't upgraded since 2.whatever.

Posted: 2003-12-28 07:23pm
by Slartibartfast
I tried 3 for a while. Got tired of it and went back to 2.

At first I was all like "winamp skins sucks, you can't really make whatever skin you like", but after using W3 I got tired and annoyed because I could never find the play button or the volume - every time I changed skins :P

Winamp 2 is the best mp3 player ever for me. It's "video player" is a bit annoying tho.

Posted: 2003-12-28 08:00pm
by Tolya
Geez, I was reinstalling my system, so I thought "why not install the new winamp?". So I dloaded the 3 when it came out...and after two days of feeling increasingly frustrated...and after waiting like 10 seconds for an mp3 file to open...and then to watch how it eats 50% of processor usage...I got back to the 2.61, which is just perfect - small, lightweight and easy to operate.

Posted: 2003-12-28 08:32pm
by Shinova
I'm using Winamp 2.9 at the moment. Had it for months.

Posted: 2003-12-28 10:54pm
by Pu-239
Winamp 3 isn't that bad- even runs okayish (as in as slow as mozilla(but people find mozilla acceptable, so meh)) on a PII-266 (haven't tried it on the PII-450, since it obviously doesn't run on Linux (heard rumors of a Linux port though- XMMS irritates me by the fact that it doesn't use GTK2).

Posted: 2003-12-28 11:08pm
by Crayz9000
I've been using Winamp 2.92 (IIRC) so anyway, I usually use XMMS when I'm running Linux.

The lack of GTK2 in XMMS doesn't bother me much. At least it works and isn't too clumsy.

Posted: 2003-12-29 12:00am
by Brother-Captain Gaius
Using 3.0c here... I haven't had any problems and I see no need to change versions.

Posted: 2003-12-29 01:15am
by General Zod
i'm still using 2.9, though i'll use W3 for .ogg files. does anyone know if the new winamp version supports .ogg vorbis?

Posted: 2003-12-29 01:30am
by Archaic`
It does. IIRC, it comes with an inbuilt ripper for Ogg Vorbis, but you need to get a paid version if you want an MP3 ripper that can do the same bitrates as the .ogg one.

Posted: 2003-12-29 01:59am
by DPDarkPrimus
I can run Photoshop, surt the 'Net, and have MSN and AIM open, all while using v2.81.

That's why I like it. :P

Posted: 2003-12-29 02:49am
by Datana
I rather like the skinning engine in Winamp 5, plus it's the first version to support non-English encoding without an additional plugin (Tixsoft Fontplug is running close to 4 years without an update, and there are numerous bugs in it, so I don't want to rely on it). On the downside, it consumes a bit under half of my CPU cycles and takes close to 10 seconds to load with Winamp 3 style skins, which are required for international text support. I'll stick with Winamp 2.92 for now, thanks.

Posted: 2003-12-29 10:20am
by Gandalf
I've been using WMP3 since it came out, I've never had any problems whatsoever.

Posted: 2003-12-29 10:24am
by Tribun
I use Winamp 2.72 German, and won't even consider changing.

Posted: 2003-12-29 03:00pm
by phongn
Versions prior to the second release of WA2.81 have a security flaw in them, by the way.

Posted: 2003-12-29 03:25pm
by CmdrWilkens
phongn wrote:Versions prior to the second release of WA2.81 have a security flaw in them, by the way.
Part of the reason why I use 2.9something.

Posted: 2004-01-13 03:57am
by Shinova
Which of these programs have that ability I heard where it keeps the volume same for all songs in a playlist?

Posted: 2004-01-13 05:37am
by Wild Karrde
Shinova wrote:Which of these programs have that ability I heard where it keeps the volume same for all songs in a playlist?
iTunes has that, don't know about the others though.

Posted: 2004-01-13 11:36am
by phongn
Shinova wrote:Which of these programs have that ability I heard where it keeps the volume same for all songs in a playlist?
There are plugins available for Winamp (Rocksteady is an example) that do what is called "dynamic compression" to make the loud parts not so loud and the quiet parts louder. Don't use it, such things are evil.

Another tool is called ReplayGain, which essentially writes a bit of information to the ID3 tag telling your player to adjust the volume on a per-file basis. It is not dynamic compression, however.

Posted: 2004-01-13 02:24pm
by Faram
Okay Winamp 5 is CRAP!

Don't know what did it prob som DRM stuff or sumthing but it broke my computer.

Install Winamp and restart= No CD Drives!

Uninstall, Reboot = No CD Drives!

Rollback to Sunday = CD Drives.

Nullsoft BITE ME and GO TO HELL!

Posted: 2004-01-13 03:49pm
by darthdavid
3.0d and perfectly satifisyed. I've got enough ram and processor power to reasonably pull it off. It's not the fastest but meh.

Posted: 2004-01-13 04:51pm
by Luzifer's right hand
I was a die-hard winamp(2.72 German) user until a few weeks ago. I bought a new cd and it wouldn't let me add it to my playlist or even want to find it. I tried WMP3 and 5, but I still had the same problem.
I use Quintessential Player 4.1 now and I'm happy with it.(the defaul skin sucks but you can download others)

0 % of processor use and 8.800 Kb Ram on my xomputer