Page 1 of 1
Goldeneye 2
Posted: 2004-02-28 08:34pm
by YT300000
Posted: 2004-02-28 09:05pm
by Techno_Union
Thats gonna be awesome.
Posted: 2004-02-28 09:34pm
by DPDarkPrimus
Techno_Union wrote:Thats gonna be awesome.
EA is making it. It can't be
that awesome.
Let's also remember "Contract JACK".
Posted: 2004-02-28 09:46pm
by Temjin
It's going to be crap.
Just because the first Goldeneye was a great game, Does not mean that Goldeneye two will be good. They are created by two different studios. And EA is not known for it's great Bond games.
Hell, they're obviously hoping the licsense will sell it. They know people will automatically think that because the first one was great, the second one has to be even better.
Posted: 2004-02-28 09:55pm
by Techno_Union
Ya I guess thats actually true, but I liked Nightfire...to a certain extent. Really it was just the small helicoptors i liked
.
Posted: 2004-02-28 10:06pm
by Gandalf
Players will join ranks with the legendary super-villain Auric Goldfinger.
Woo!
Goldfinger...
He's the man
The man with the Midas touch
A spiders touch.
Such, a cold finger
Beckons you
To enter his web of sin
But don't go in.
Posted: 2004-02-28 10:21pm
by Mr Bean
Let's also remember "Contract JACK".
Lets not, biggest waste of my money, coming from the same people or at least distant cousins of the same people to make NOLF2 that game let me down on so many levels, take out the fun gagets of NOLF2, the intresting puzzles and small touches and then quadruple the number of enemys, dumb their IQ down by half and make it tough and you have Contract JACK
It turned into a campy sixties clone of Doom without the Demons
Posted: 2004-02-28 10:24pm
by Chardok
DPDarkPrimus wrote:Techno_Union wrote:Thats gonna be awesome.
EA is making it. It can't be
that awesome.
Let's also remember "Contract JACK".
EA/DICE makes BF 1942. One of the bestestest shooters evah, IMHO. I look forward to it.
Posted: 2004-02-28 10:29pm
by DPDarkPrimus
BF 1942 is multiplayer.
Posted: 2004-02-29 08:09am
by Lagmonster
The only interesting thing about this, if you gentlemen will notice, is that it is supposed to let you play the VILLAIN in the Bond universe.
And frankly, I'll play through any amount of EA shooter to beat the shit out of some MI agents.
Posted: 2004-02-29 08:13am
by Ghost Rider
Lagmonster wrote:The only interesting thing about this, if you gentlemen will notice, is that it is supposed to let you play the VILLAIN in the Bond universe.
And frankly, I'll play through any amount of EA shooter to beat the shit out of some MI agents.
True, that does make it worthy as a rental.
"No, Mister Bond I expect you to die!"
Posted: 2004-02-29 08:16am
by Chardok
DPDarkPrimus wrote:BF 1942 is multiplayer.
Not exclusively. the AI support in single player is quite good.
Posted: 2004-02-29 02:14pm
by DPDarkPrimus
Lagmonster wrote:The only interesting thing about this, if you gentlemen will notice, is that it is supposed to let you play the VILLAIN in the Bond universe.
Again, I direct you to "Contract JACK".
Posted: 2004-02-29 06:12pm
by Tatterdemalion
Smells like a blatent cash-in to me. I suppose it COULD be good, but from the sound of it EA are going to rush it through development as fast as possible and bank on the Goldeneye name to ensure profit, like just about evey other sequal they've made.
Posted: 2004-03-01 06:39am
by Dillon
It could be good. EA isn't exactly super at making decent FPS's, but they seemed to sort of get the hang of it with Nightfire, which was a huge improvement over Agent Under Fire which was complete horse shit.
Posted: 2004-03-01 09:18am
by Admiral Valdemar
I hear Everything Or Nothing is actually pretty good. Far better than the TND game, and other two Bond games EA have fucked up. Maybe the last few years of their contract will get them level with Rare's godly game.