Unsecured computers

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

Post Reply
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Unsecured computers

Post by Ace Pace »

http://news.com.com/Study%3A+Unpatched+ ... tag=cd.top

Study: Unpatched PCs compromised in 20 minutes
Published: August 17, 2004, 12:22 PM PDT
By Matt Loney and Robert Lemos
Special to CNET News.com



Don't connect that new PC to the Internet before taking security precautions, researchers at the Internet Storm Center warned Tuesday.

According to the researchers, an unpatched Windows PC connected to the Internet will last for only about 20 minutes before it's compromised by malware, on average. That figure is down from around 40 minutes, the group's estimate in 2003.

The Internet Storm Center, which is part of the SANS Institute, calculated the 20-minute "survival time" by listening on vacant Internet Protocol addresses and timing the frequency of reports received there.

"If you are assuming that most of these reports are generated by worms that attempt to propagate, an unpatched system would be infected by such a probe," the center, which provides research and education on security issues, said in a statement.

The drop from 40 minutes to 20 minutes is worrisome because it means the average "survival time" is not long enough for a user to download the very patches that would protect a PC from Internet threats.

Scott Conti, network operations manager for the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, said he finds the center's data believeable.

"It's a tough problem, and it's getting tougher," Conti said.

One of Conti's administrators tested the center's data recently by placing two unpatched computers on the network. Both were compromised within 20 minutes, he said.

The school is now checking the status of computers before letting them connect to the Internet. If a machine doesn't have the latest patches, it gets quarantined with limited network access until the PC is back up to date.

"We are giving the people the ability to remediate before connecting to the network," Conti said.

The center also said in its analysis that the time it takes for a computer to be compromised will vary widely from network to network.

If the Internet service provider blocks the data channels commonly used by worms to spread, then a PC user will have more time to patch.

"On the other hand, university networks and users of high-speed Internet services are frequently targeted with additional scans from malware like bots," the group stated. "If you are connected to such a network, your 'survival time' will be much smaller."

In a guide to patching a new Windows system, the Internet Storm Center recommends that users turn off Windows file sharing and enable the Internet Connection Firewall. Microsoft's latest security update, Windows XP Service Pack 2, will set such a configuration, but users will have to go online to get the update, opening themselves up to attack.

One problem, experts say, is network administrators' reliance on patching and their assumption that users will quickly patch systems.

Speaking recently at the Microsoft TechEd developer conference in Amsterdam, Microsoft security consultant Fred Baumhardt said the day is likely to come when a virus or worm brings down everything.

"Nobody will have time to detect it," he said. "Nobody will have time to issue patches or virus definitions and get them out there. This shows that patch management is not the be-all and end-all."

Baumhardt stressed the importance of adaptability, using the human immune system as an example: "Imagine if your body said, 'Hmm, I have the flu. I've never had this before, so I'll die.' But that doesn't happen: Your body raises its temperature and so on, to buy time while other mechanisms kick in."

"If the human body did patch management the way (companies do), we'd all be dead."
Not really news, but intresting, importent for those of us that constantly help friends with PC problems, a new PC should get SP1 and SP2 handed on a disc.

On that matter, where can I find SP1 and SP2 basic for download as a file to my computer, so i can burn them and distribute?
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
Rogue 9
Scrapping TIEs since 1997
Posts: 18683
Joined: 2003-11-12 01:10pm
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by Rogue 9 »

The drop from 40 minutes to 20 minutes is worrisome because it means the average "survival time" is not long enough for a user to download the very patches that would protect a PC from Internet threats.
Depends entirely on your connection, really. I got my first set of patches in seven minutes.
It's Rogue, not Rouge!

HAB | KotL | VRWC/ELC/CDA | TRotR | The Anti-Confederate | Sluggite | Gamer | Blogger | Staff Reporter | Student | Musician
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Post by Ace Pace »

Rogue 9 wrote: Depends entirely on your connection, really. I got my first set of patches in seven minutes.
Obviously, but that assumes, as it is today, that most of the world does not have broadband, even though the U.S has finnaly reached 50%.
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
McNum
Padawan Learner
Posts: 471
Joined: 2002-12-14 03:47pm
Location: Denmark

Post by McNum »

20 minutes? I got my last worm in 5 minutes after a reinstall. And that's how you learn NOT to be online while installing Windows XP...
I'm the Randomly Chosen One!
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

That's probably the avg time. Anyway, most people w/ broadband should have a firewall/connected behind NAT. I have a firewall running anyway, but I'm on dialup (for long periods of time)- should I be worrying about the winboxes which occasionally dial up directly?

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
User avatar
Vertigo1
Defender of the Night
Posts: 4720
Joined: 2002-08-12 12:47am
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Re: Unsecured computers

Post by Vertigo1 »

Ace Pace wrote:On that matter, where can I find SP1 and SP2 basic for download as a file to my computer, so i can burn them and distribute?
www.microsoft.com

;) (seriously though, its not that hard to find. Hell, it was even posted on this very forum.)
"I once asked Rebecca to sing Happy Birthday to me during sex. That was funny, especially since I timed my thrusts to sync up with the words. And yes, it was my birthday." - Darth Wong

Leader of the SD.Net Gargoyle Clan | Spacebattles Firstone | Twitter
User avatar
Sokartawi
Crazy Karma Chameleon
Posts: 805
Joined: 2004-01-08 09:17pm
Contact:

Post by Sokartawi »

Heh... My server running on win98SE is STILL unpatched and on since January, last time I looked in there for weird things and virusses is 2 months ago and there was nothing in there.

I'd say it's a WinXP problem, like many things are... :twisted:
The thread title is misleading. It's not "unsecured computers", but rather "unsecure operating systems".

Now, I'm absolutely not saying Win98 is secure at all and I'm not going to compare the two, since if everyone would run on Win98 there would probably be blaster-like things for that OS too, but I'm saying that M$ did not do a very good job in making WinXP a secure OS, especially in it's unpatched state.
Stubborn as ever - Let's hope it pays off this time.
User avatar
Faram
Bastard Operator from Hell
Posts: 5271
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:39am
Location: Fighting Polarbears

Post by Faram »

Get a cheap router, that will take care of a lot of attacks from the internet.

Then D/L patches and stuff.
[img=right]http://hem.bredband.net/b217293/warsaban.gif[/img]

"Either God wants to abolish evil, and cannot; or he can, but does not want to. ... If he wants to, but cannot, he is impotent. If he can, but does not want to, he is wicked. ... If, as they say, God can abolish evil, and God really wants to do it, why is there evil in the world?" -Epicurus


Fear is the mother of all gods.

Nature does all things spontaneously, by herself, without the meddling of the gods. -Lucretius
User avatar
Einhander Sn0m4n
Insane Railgunner
Posts: 18630
Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.

Post by Einhander Sn0m4n »

Make Windows Open-Source. Release it as .ISOs and .torrents on SourceForge. Ditch the GODsDAMN ActiveHaX crap and the whole idea of web-on-hard-drive content beyond "Right-click>Save-As". Start a support network of sites and volunteers to help debug the thing 24/7/365. Make sure Explorer.exe dies a painful death. Make sure Idiot Exploiter dies an even more gruesome and messy death. Use a commandline interface to augment the windowing system, journaling filesystems, and turn off ALL unneeded services by default. Keep the browser inside a sandbox separate from the Kernel. Keep the WINDOWING SYSTEM away from the Kernel. AND FUCKING USE SLASH INSTEAD OF BACKSLASH FFS!

Then we'll have Real Windows Security.


Oh wait, I just described practically every last *N*X OS other than SCO UNIX... :P
Image Image
User avatar
Sokartawi
Crazy Karma Chameleon
Posts: 805
Joined: 2004-01-08 09:17pm
Contact:

Post by Sokartawi »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote: Make Windows Open-Source.
Ditch the GODsDAMN ActiveHaX crap
Use a commandline interface to augment the windowing system,and turn off ALL unneeded services by default
Keep the browser inside a sandbox separate from the Kernel.
Keep the WINDOWING SYSTEM away from the Kernel.
These things annoy me as hell in winblows yah, and every idiot should have known that it should have been done differntly in a PROPER OS.
Stubborn as ever - Let's hope it pays off this time.
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Make Windows Open-Source. Release it as .ISOs and .torrents on SourceForge. Ditch the GODsDAMN ActiveHaX crap and the whole idea of web-on-hard-drive content beyond "Right-click>Save-As". Start a support network of sites and volunteers to help debug the thing 24/7/365. Make sure Explorer.exe dies a painful death. Make sure Idiot Exploiter dies an even more gruesome and messy death. Use a commandline interface to augment the windowing system, journaling filesystems, and turn off ALL unneeded services by default. Keep the browser inside a sandbox separate from the Kernel. Keep the WINDOWING SYSTEM away from the Kernel. AND FUCKING USE SLASH INSTEAD OF BACKSLASH FFS!

Then we'll have Real Windows Security.


Oh wait, I just described practically every last *N*X OS other than SCO UNIX... :P
Or just use Linux. :P

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
Post Reply