StarDestroyer.Net BBS

I propose we have a sort of ladder competition on RTW. We seem to have enough people playing it, anyway. We can have tournaments on R:TW in different categories, too. All RTW players are eligible.

the categories shall be:

Immovable object (town defense solo)
"" Objects (Team town defense)

For consistency, the town shall have the same defenses each time (Large stone walls)

Blockbuster (Siege master)
Blockbusters (Team siege masters)

(In the event the immovable object is NEVER overtaken, the blockbuster will be the person with the greatest percentage of enemy troops eliminated before being routed, the same goes for the team blockbusters)

Master Tactician (Open field battlemaster)
Tacticians (Team battlemasters)

Each contestant shall start with 10k denari. and in the event of a siege, of single defender Vs. team attackers, they shall have 15k denari (5k less because they have boiling fucking pitch, godlike choke points in the town and whatnot. in the event of a team defender vs. single attacker the defending team gets 10k ONLY and the attacker shall recieve 15k, due to the fact that there will be much less each defender must micromanage.)

Teams shall be teams of two and two only. Your tems are permanent. So if rogue 9's teammate is vympel for a team assault, he cannot have Me as a teammate for the open field team battle. we can do 2 out of 3 if you prefer as well. (This is to prevent more than two people having immovable objects titles)

We can even go open challenges as well for titles. So If I don't like the fact that rogue 9 has the immovable object title, I can challenge him for it, and he will have to assault me inside the city. In the event he fails, the title is mine. (This is, however, only after the title holders are determined.) the title holder does not *have* to accept a title challenge, but it will alter his win/loss record. I would also encourage each player to have their win/loss record in their sig, so we can all dick-wave over it.

There doesn't need to be a set schedule, and I'm horrible at organizing...so if anyone knows how to, it'd be great if an initial tournament ladder-type thing can be set up to determine the initial champions; after that, we can do the open-challenges thing.


Anyone interested?


*raises hand eagerly*

Cause I'll pwn you all.

I call Macedonians, because that way no one's beating me.

I call the Gauls, therefore, when I lose I can just claim barbarians suxx0rs.
EDIT: Seriously though, I think I'd like to play as the Egyptians or the Armenians. (Cataphracts rock!)

If I can get this working I'm in.


Oh, and I call the Romans!

If I can play online, then its the Seleucids or the Parthians.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Straha wrote:If I can get this working I'm in.


Oh, and I call the Romans!

There's like 4 factions of Romans



I call the.....Carthaginians

I bags the Greek Cities.

MEN OF SPARTA!

Well, I'm out until my financial situation improves.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

fgalkin wrote:Well, I'm out until my financial situation improves.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

no internet access at home?

Well I could be interested...

If I werent still addicted at the singleplayer aspect of the game

Anyone interested in forming alliance blocs?

Captain tycho wrote:Anyone interested in forming alliance blocs?

That's what "Teams" are for.


Is this everyone? (Wonder if Mike will be in???)

At any rate, We'll reserve a spot for FGalkin to pop in if he wants to (In the event we absolutely can't wait.

Anyone willing to do up the ladder for Singles?

Fook it. I'll do em up when I get home tonight. singles first, we'll do teams later

I'll definitely play in this and I call Senate.

Ok, I've made up my mind. I call Egypt.

One ground rule: I don't think we should allow more than 1 onager unit per army. They're just too powerful (I beat someone with only onagers and cavalry).

StarshipTitanic wrote:One ground rule: I don't think we should allow more than 1 onager unit per army. They're just too powerful (I beat someone with only onagers and cavalry).

Now, now, Tits. You are uber. I had two onagers Vs. You and you still pwned me.

Okay, here's round one: (You guys can take your time, just report your wins/losses in this thread when you finish up. Set your own game times that are convienent fur dich) 1st round is for open field competition for the title of Master tactican: Singles. Late entry guys (FGalkin et al.) can fight each other, reporting their win, just let us know who is fighting whom.

open field, mutually agreed upon territory (Preferrably non advantageous to either, but if your a glutton.....)

10k Denari



Tits
Vs.
Tycho


Straha
Vs.
Chardok

Vympel
Vs.
Redswingline

I call the Brutii, but I won't be able to do shit until they release the ports that RTW uses so I can program my router

I may be able to play onlne after all. But probably not this week, because I'm busy with exams and papers and such. Although I may have some free time on the weekend.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

okay,


FGalkin Vs. The Shep

When they are ready

Chardok wrote:

StarshipTitanic wrote:One ground rule: I don't think we should allow more than 1 onager unit per army. They're just too powerful (I beat someone with only onagers and cavalry).

Now, now, Tits. You are uber. I had two onagers Vs. You and you still pwned me.

That was in a city, though, and the long distance interfered with accuracy. I think 1 onager is enough for an army.

Also, how much money are we allowed to use?

Tits, please be nice....

If I have time to participate, I'd like to play Seleucids or Greek City States.