Page 1 of 1
Which one to play first?
Posted: 2004-11-18 06:01pm
by Enigma
I got both Vampire: The Masquerade Redemption and Command and Conquer: Generals but I can't make up my mind which one to play first.
Which one would you suggest?
Posted: 2004-11-18 07:14pm
by Arthur_Tuxedo
I found V:tMR to be very enjoyable. Haven't played Generals enough to vouch for or against it, though.
Posted: 2004-11-18 08:21pm
by Ma Deuce
The campaign for Generals is very fun the first few times: too short for my tastes, and with little story connecting the missions, but still loads of fun (playing as China is the most fun, for their flame weapons, nukes, and Overlord tanks)
Posted: 2004-11-18 08:28pm
by Rogue 9
Command & Conquer.
Posted: 2004-11-19 09:52am
by Ace Pace
Rogue 9 wrote:Command & Conquer.
Echoed.
No RPG matchs the sheer crazyness of walking a bunch of arab halftracks into a street, then bunkering it with AT men.
Posted: 2004-11-19 10:21am
by Mr Bean
Vampire because I already played Generals in your case however you'll probably get more milage out of Vampire then Generals
Posted: 2004-11-19 07:05pm
by Enigma
Thanks! Now to conquer!
Posted: 2004-11-19 07:11pm
by Soontir C'boath
Play Generals first, then you'll get tired of it sooner or later as I have and then it'll be endless fun for your other game.
Posted: 2004-11-19 07:35pm
by SecondStorm
Ive played both.
Generals without Zero Hour was mediocre.
V:TR would take alot more of your time and IMO more enjoyable but you have to be a player/fan of Vampire the Masquerade or else you'll lose alot of flavour.
And remember to get the patch! V:TR without that patch is damn near impossible to play because of a huge amount of bugs.