Page 1 of 1

spyware detection program?

Posted: 2005-01-07 08:13pm
by Thanas
I have already got Adaware, but I'd like to get a second opinion.

What do you use?

Posted: 2005-01-07 08:15pm
by darthdavid
Well on any 'doze computer I always use Spybot S&D.

Posted: 2005-01-07 08:18pm
by General Zod
there's also cwshredder and hijack this. a google search should turn up either one with relative ease.

Posted: 2005-01-07 11:22pm
by Xon
"Mircrosoft's Antispyware" (yes thats its name! How inventive of them...) doesnt look to bad. But I would use more than 1 product.

Posted: 2005-01-07 11:59pm
by JediToren

Posted: 2005-01-08 02:32am
by Dead_Ghost
I also use Spyware Doctor asides those JediToren posted.

Posted: 2005-01-08 03:07am
by andrewgpaul
I tried the MS one, and it picked up a couple of things Ad-Aware and Spybot missed.

Posted: 2005-01-12 03:30pm
by Thanas
Thanks, guys. You've been very helpful. :D

Posted: 2005-01-12 06:47pm
by Faram
andrewgpaul wrote:I tried the MS one, and it picked up a couple of things Ad-Aware and Spybot missed.
MS new anti spyware app generates a ton of False Possetives.

Don't trust it to much rite now.

Posted: 2005-01-12 10:34pm
by Xon
Faram wrote:
andrewgpaul wrote:I tried the MS one, and it picked up a couple of things Ad-Aware and Spybot missed.
MS new anti spyware app generates a ton of False Possetives.

Don't trust it to much rite now.
Most of those 'false positives', are all potential malware and/or parts of rootkits.

In a home user context with, you would not expect to find much legitimat use for multi-thousand dollars of/highly complex remote administration software on a single user machine run by Joe sixpack who only uses this computer to look at 'free' adult content.

That is the type of audience this product is aimed at cleaning up after.

Posted: 2005-01-13 02:35am
by Faram
ggs wrote:
Faram wrote:
andrewgpaul wrote:I tried the MS one, and it picked up a couple of things Ad-Aware and Spybot missed.
MS new anti spyware app generates a ton of False Possetives.

Don't trust it to much rite now.
Most of those 'false positives', are all potential malware and/or parts of rootkits.

In a home user context with, you would not expect to find much legitimat use for multi-thousand dollars of/highly complex remote administration software on a single user machine run by Joe sixpack who only uses this computer to look at 'free' adult content.

That is the type of audience this product is aimed at cleaning up after.
Perhaps, I still think that giving a FP on some sites in the restricted zones and giving a warning about WinPcap is bad.

Granted anyone that knows how to use WinPcap probebly knows enuff not to remove it if they have installed it.

Posted: 2005-01-14 02:50am
by Vertigo1
You know, you could also read the FAQ sticky.....