Microsoft Phaser Intellimouse
Posted: 2005-02-10 05:05pm
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=62382
I'll see your holographic TOS mousepad and raise you a gridfire mouse!!!Destructionator XIII wrote:Your turbolaser mouse is NO match for my holographic TOS mousepad!Aya wrote:That would nice to use until the new Turbolaser mice come out.
Cordless mice are a pain in the ass. I hate changing batteries. I'll take a cord mouse anyday over a cordless one.brianeyci wrote:I have X-trac Hammer $50 dollar mousepad and was one of the first to get MX 510 when it came out. Cord all the way baby. I didn't want to risk getting 700 or 900 later because they were cordless. And I probably won't get this mouse because it is cordless. Am I too old school?
Brian
Does the term 'rechargeable batteries' mean anything to you?Robert Walper wrote:Cordless mice are a pain in the ass. I hate changing batteries. I'll take a cord mouse anyday over a cordless one.brianeyci wrote:I have X-trac Hammer $50 dollar mousepad and was one of the first to get MX 510 when it came out. Cord all the way baby. I didn't want to risk getting 700 or 900 later because they were cordless. And I probably won't get this mouse because it is cordless. Am I too old school?
Brian
Until they come up with some decent batteries that is.
Err, what? It takes a cord no matter what as you need a transceiver station for the cordless mouse to work in the first place. How does putting the mouse in said station to recharge mean any serious bother?Destructionator XIII wrote:Still, that means plugging them in, which takes a cord. I agree that wireless keyboards and mice are worthless.Batman wrote: Does the term 'rechargeable batteries' mean anything to you?
My apologies if I seemed a bit harsh. It's just that I'm partial to cordless on acount ofDestructionator XIII wrote:ve any use for them myself, and everyone I know with one uses them only for the purpose of showing off. I suppose they do have their place.
I maintain that Logitech's are far superior in ergonomic terms, and since they have demonstrated superior ROF and firepower, Logitech ground forces would triumph.InnocentBystander wrote:They don't let civilians use Phaser Type IIs
http://personal.stevens.edu/~dstier/phaserII.jpg