Page 1 of 1

Microsoft Phaser Intellimouse

Posted: 2005-02-10 05:05pm
by Alyeska
Product Review

I want one. :lol:

Posted: 2005-02-10 05:25pm
by Jason von Evil
That would nice to use until the new Turbolaser mice come out. :D

Posted: 2005-02-10 05:32pm
by brianeyci
I have X-trac Hammer $50 dollar mousepad and was one of the first to get MX 510 when it came out. Cord all the way baby. I didn't want to risk getting 700 or 900 later because they were cordless. And I probably won't get this mouse because it is cordless. Am I too old school? :twisted:

Brian

Posted: 2005-02-10 05:49pm
by Batman
Destructionator XIII wrote:
Aya wrote:That would nice to use until the new Turbolaser mice come out. :D
Your turbolaser mouse is NO match for my holographic TOS mousepad!
I'll see your holographic TOS mousepad and raise you a gridfire mouse!!!
You're spamming, Master Bruce.
Well, yes, but that's what this thread is about. I mean c'mon, phaser mouse?

Posted: 2005-02-10 06:48pm
by Robert Walper
brianeyci wrote:I have X-trac Hammer $50 dollar mousepad and was one of the first to get MX 510 when it came out. Cord all the way baby. I didn't want to risk getting 700 or 900 later because they were cordless. And I probably won't get this mouse because it is cordless. Am I too old school? :twisted:

Brian
Cordless mice are a pain in the ass. I hate changing batteries. I'll take a cord mouse anyday over a cordless one.

Until they come up with some decent batteries that is.

Posted: 2005-02-10 06:49pm
by Batman
Robert Walper wrote:
brianeyci wrote:I have X-trac Hammer $50 dollar mousepad and was one of the first to get MX 510 when it came out. Cord all the way baby. I didn't want to risk getting 700 or 900 later because they were cordless. And I probably won't get this mouse because it is cordless. Am I too old school? :twisted:
Brian
Cordless mice are a pain in the ass. I hate changing batteries. I'll take a cord mouse anyday over a cordless one.
Until they come up with some decent batteries that is.
Does the term 'rechargeable batteries' mean anything to you?

Posted: 2005-02-10 07:14pm
by Batman
Destructionator XIII wrote:
Batman wrote: Does the term 'rechargeable batteries' mean anything to you?
Still, that means plugging them in, which takes a cord. I agree that wireless keyboards and mice are worthless.
Err, what? It takes a cord no matter what as you need a transceiver station for the cordless mouse to work in the first place. How does putting the mouse in said station to recharge mean any serious bother?
And wireless mice and keyboards are NOT worthless. I can only assume you never needed to set up a PC workplace in a situation where cable length was a serious concern. Like, you know, an office workplace. Let's throw in a left-handed worker just to spite you.

Posted: 2005-02-10 07:26pm
by Batman
Destructionator XIII wrote:ve any use for them myself, and everyone I know with one uses them only for the purpose of showing off. I suppose they do have their place.
My apologies if I seemed a bit harsh. It's just that I'm partial to cordless on acount of
a) having a rig that would need mouse extension cords if nothing else in a cord scenario, and
b) having had to fiddle with workplace arrangements way to often on account of KB/mouse cord lengths.
YES, there are potential problems with cordless. YES, a lot of people use them merely to brag. Nevertheless, until the computer industry realizes they need to increase cord length by at least a factor of five I maintain that cordless serves a purpose .

Posted: 2005-02-10 07:45pm
by InnocentBystander
They don't let civilians use Phaser Type IIs :lol:
Image

Posted: 2005-02-11 02:08am
by Worlds Spanner
I've been using a cordless mouse for two years now and love it. I got it because I needed a new mouse, and I wanted a four button mouse for gaming reasons. At that point I was fairly high end already, and a cordless *with docking station* was only a little more expensive. I would never get a cordless mouse without a docking station. What if I needed to change the batteries while playing a game?

It's just great - I never have to worry abuut the cord catching behind the desk, and I can also lean back and use the mouse beyojd the reach of a cord when watching a movie or something. And the battery never needs changing.

Posted: 2005-02-11 02:50am
by Companion Cube
InnocentBystander wrote:They don't let civilians use Phaser Type IIs :lol:
http://personal.stevens.edu/~dstier/phaserII.jpg
I maintain that Logitech's are far superior in ergonomic terms, and since they have demonstrated superior ROF and firepower, Logitech ground forces would triumph. :P