Page 1 of 1
CRT vs LCD pixel burnout
Posted: 2005-05-05 06:38pm
by Shinova
Screensavers exist to prevent pixels on a constant screen from burning themselves or something, I can't recall exactly what.
But my question is, which type is at a greater danger from a too-constant screen?
Posted: 2005-05-05 06:40pm
by General Zod
not sure entirely, but you're probably better off simply shutting down your monitor rather than letting the screensaver run for hours on end. if nothing else to save the power it uses.
Posted: 2005-05-05 06:43pm
by Faram
Yep
Way back a screensaver just shut down the screen.
And that made people think that the comp was shutdown or somthing and pressed the power button.
So someone had the idea to add fireworks, flying toasters, and my favorite
Johnny Castaway
And yes I have seen plenty of CRT screens with burnt in information on them but never on an LCD.
But do not take that as a garantee that it cannot happen on a LCD!
Posted: 2005-05-05 07:04pm
by Shinova
I do shut off my screen, my real question was which one can "burn out" faster.
So CRTs, according to Faram?
Posted: 2005-05-05 07:11pm
by SCRawl
The main issue with an LCD screen is lamp life. IMHO, having a screen saver on an LCD screen that does anything other than turn it off is absolutely pointless.
Posted: 2005-05-05 07:37pm
by phongn
LCDs can't burn in. Plasma screens and CRTs can, however. That said, you may as well just have the monitor go into standby mode rather than waste energy.
Posted: 2005-05-05 07:44pm
by SPOOFE
Some of us like wasting energy...
Posted: 2005-05-05 09:41pm
by Enigma
Meh. I just leave my monitor on 24\7 and to hell with burnt icons.