StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Hi all,

Just a question to the gaming gurus out there. Ive been on the net since I was 16, yet I have never once played an Online game. Im partial to RPG's and RTS mostly, even if Im not that good. What Im really asking is does anyone know of some decent Online games that dont cost anything to play? Even though Id like to try WoW, I cant really afford it.

I've heard Gunbound is good times.

Gunbound and Navy Field are both entertaining, but it's the kind of 'You play the same damn 5 minutes over and over and over again' game from Korea. You'll tire of it fast, especially since it takes weeks to get the newbiest peice of anything.

I personally enjoy MUSHing, a good way to RP and stuff while you're at it. Kingdom of Loathing is a good MUD-like graphical MMORPG that's out there... em. Yeah.

Soldat. Get now.

America's Army is a free, A-grade high-budget online game, courtesy of the United States Army.

NukeZone A browser-based strategy game. Much fun.

I hear Guild wars has free online play...you buy the game and can play online free.Though I could be wrong .

Typhonis 1 wrote:I hear Guild wars has free online play...you buy the game and can play online free.Though I could be wrong .

You are correct. You buy the game and play to your hearts content, never having to pay another dime. Well... until the expansions come out, at which point you'd probably want to buy those.

Guild wars sounds interesting, Ill have to see if I can find a copy

pellaeons_scion wrote:Guild wars sounds interesting, Ill have to see if I can find a copy

I just bought a copy for $50. It's not too cheap, but no more than a standard new PC game.

Beowulf wrote:

pellaeons_scion wrote:Guild wars sounds interesting, Ill have to see if I can find a copy

I just bought a copy for $50. It's not too cheap, but no more than a standard new PC game.

Are there servers for european players? If not do you have any idea what the ping is like from there? Or is it irrelevent outside of the cities?

No no no... NOT Soldat.... My advice is to avoid that turd, unless you like to be reminded of the good old days of the Commodore 64.

Superman wrote:No no no... NOT Soldat.... My advice is to avoid that turd, unless you like to be reminded of the good old days of the Commodore 64.

Silence, heretic. You know not of that which you speak.

Are there servers for european players? If not do you have any idea what the ping is like from there? Or is it irrelevent outside of the cities?

There's servers for the Americas, Europe, and Asia (Korea, at least). Upon registering you declare your allegiance/server location and any PvP as well some end-game PvE content is affected by this.

America's Army is pretty good for the realism camp, although you have to go through several "training" missions to unlock the fun stuff.

Still, when you get to kit out your own M4A1, you can get anything from a mini-machine gun to a mini-sniper rifle. Very fun on maps.

Have you looked at Kingdom of Loathing? It's a little different from the rest, but it's really fun.

Direct link

Nephtys wrote:Gunbound and Navy Field are both entertaining, but it's the kind of 'You play the same damn 5 minutes over and over and over again' game from Korea. You'll tire of it fast, especially since it takes weeks to get the newbiest peice of anything.

I personally enjoy MUSHing, a good way to RP and stuff while you're at it. Kingdom of Loathing is a good MUD-like graphical MMORPG that's out there... em. Yeah.

Navy Field looks interesting... but unfortunately the download for the client isn't available >_<

For NukeZone, do we still have the alliance of board members?

If you're looking for something fairly D&D-ish, and are behind on the times by four or five years (like yours truely) I suppose that Diablo II and Lord of Destruction are sort of the thing to go to. I don't think Battle.net costs anything, and you can pick the games up on the cheap - I just picked up the Battlechest for something around 25 smackers,, and the multi-player's supposedly legendary.

Give me a ring in a few weekss once I finish the SP campaign and start going all multi-player - if you decide to go that way, maybe we could pair up.

Sharpshooter wrote:If you're looking for something fairly D&D-ish, and are behind on the times by four or five years (like yours truely) I suppose that Diablo II and Lord of Destruction are sort of the thing to go to. I don't think Battle.net costs anything, and you can pick the games up on the cheap - I just picked up the Battlechest for something around 25 smackers,, and the multi-player's supposedly legendary.

WARNING: Diablo 2 is crack. And yeah, it goes on the cheap with the Battle Chest (D1, D2, LoD Xpack, failry useless strategy guide). But once you start... well, it will eventually get old, as is the wont of all video games, but until then it can be quite addictive. It doesn't help that 1.10 is still shit as far as I'm concerned...

Speaking of which: Single-player is nothing, I wouldn't even bother with it. The real experience of Diablo 2 is on bnet.

really? I kinda enjoyed d2 with LOD just single player. How come its so much better on bnet? I was hesitant to go on there mainly because even in single player I die...a lot

There's Ogame

http://www.ogame.org

Guild Wars is good, my system isn't top notch and the game flows fairly well, plus the lack of monthly fees is a good incentive.

pellaeons_scion wrote:really? I kinda enjoyed d2 with LOD just single player. How come its so much better on bnet? I was hesitant to go on there mainly because even in single player I die...a lot

It's better on bnet because you can play with other people; it helps if they are your friends in real life, though. Not to mention you can trade shit (you know that badass item your barb picked up for a sorc? Now it's useful!) for stuff you actually want. To top it all off, you will die less because there are other people there to help you fight, though understand that for each person that enters the game, the monsters become that many times harder--but it is still easier, in my experience.

Darth Garden Gnome wrote:Speaking of which: Single-player is nothing, I wouldn't even bother with it. The real experience of Diablo 2 is on bnet.

Yeah, but I need something to do (until I get a proper keyboard - then Descent III steps in) until that magical hour of 6 PM when I get the phone line all for myself, plus I've got to work on builds and getting to know the game better.

Unless, of course, I can do the old off-line one-man LAN-Party trick from Diablo, in which case I say screw the campaign...

[muse]Now, let's see: Fanaticism and Meditation I know I want, maybe Redemption or Prayer, but should I go with Zeal or Charge...?[/muse]

Upon reading Superman's asertion of Soldat, I downloaded it, concluding it had to be good.

And it is soooo good. I've been spending several hours honing my skills against the bots (which are pretty good unless they get stuck in some stupid spot or wont move).

I find that Diablo II is ultimately less stressful and annoying offline; the people even on the non-open realms are frustratingly stupid, vicious, useless, and prone to cheat. I'd rather take my time going through quests by myself.

I don't play often enough anymore to keep a realm character active, and I don't dare step into an Open game with my single-player characters without a recent backup of the save files. There's been a hacker in every game, and half the time they stand outside town killing anyone who steps outside.

I guess D2's probably changed a lot since I gave it up. Maybe bnet is a little be more of a hostile place then I remember it.

Sharpshooter wrote:[muse]Now, let's see: Fanaticism and Meditation I know I want, maybe Redemption or Prayer, but should I go with Zeal or Charge...?[/muse]

A paladin? You have doomed yourself to an eternity of frustration. Just walk away!