Page 1 of 1
Warring DVD format factions give up on unified format talks
Posted: 2005-08-23 01:57am
by The Grim Squeaker
Well, it’s been a wild ride up and down (and mostly down) on the HD-DVD vs. Blu-ray DVD format war roller coaster, and now all hope of a unified DVD format is officially lost.
Sony and Toshiba have totally given up all efforts to continue the unification talks.
Looks like the war will officially be waged in the market, with plenty of potential home theater installation casualties likely. It’s gonna be bloody
- Engadget
TOKYO--Groups headed by Toshiba and Sony offering competing technologies for next-generation DVDs have given up efforts to develop a unified format, the Yomiuri newspaper reported Tuesday.
For three years, the two groups have pushed to have their respective technology standards adopted to gain dominance in the multibillion-dollar markets for DVD players, PC drives and optical discs.
Toshiba, along with NEC and Sanyo, has been promoting HD DVD, while Sony and Matsushita, the maker of Panasonic brand products, have been developing a technology known as Blu-ray.
The two groups have held negotiations on unifying their formats to persuade consumers to shift to advanced discs and to promote growth in the industry. But negotiations fell through as neither side yielded, and time ran out to develop a format before the launch of new products from both groups, the paper said.
"Late August is the practical time limit (to unify formats)," Yoshihide Fujii, Toshiba's corporate senior vice president, was quoted as saying in the paper.
A Toshiba spokeswoman said Fujii just meant that the company needed to start developing software by late August for its HD DVD-based players, scheduled for release at the end of 2005.
A Sony spokesman said it has become harder to unify formats after failing to reach an agreement in negotiations in May.
Both officials agreed, however, that a unified format is still a possibility. They said a single format would be the best way, and added they would release their products as scheduled.
Sony plans to put a Blu-ray disc drive in its new PlayStation game console next year.
Sony's Blu-ray technology is also backed by Dell and South Korea's Samsung.
At the core of both formats are blue lasers, which have a shorter wavelength than red lasers used in current DVD equipment, allowing discs to store data at higher densities needed for high-definition movies and television.
Toshiba's then president, Tadashi Okamura, had said in May producers of next-generation optical discs would eventually use one format, although products based on the two competing standards may be around for a limited time.
-
Well this sucks, Just hope that a dual drive player that can read both formats comes out soon, or that blu-ray gains dominance quickly.
cnet
Posted: 2005-08-23 02:14am
by DPDarkPrimus
Well, fuck them. Not going to buy two players, so I'll wait for one.
Posted: 2005-08-23 02:37am
by Spanky The Dolphin
I didn't even know a second set of talks were going on in the first place...
Posted: 2005-08-23 02:54am
by Alyeska
Here is an interesting little tidbit. The DVD consortium is apparently going to pick HD-DVD as their choice of the next standard and put their stamp of approval on it. This could pretty much cement the Toshiba format as the winner.
Posted: 2005-08-23 03:04am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Actually, it still could all hinge on what the early adopters do. IIRC, I think I once read on The Digital Bits that there's a chance that both could actually be rejected.
Posted: 2005-08-23 03:04am
by Darth Wong
Alyeska wrote:Here is an interesting little tidbit. The DVD consortium is apparently going to pick HD-DVD as their choice of the next standard and put their stamp of approval on it. This could pretty much cement the Toshiba format as the winner.
Not by a long shot. Customers in stores don't give a shit what the DVD Consortium says. What matters is which movies are coming out on which format, how expensive the players are, and how well they perform.
Blu-Ray, by offering nearly twice the theoretical maximum capacity, looks like it will be the technically superior format. HD-DVD may well be cheaper. So the question boils down to: will customers go for the more expensive, higher-performing format, or the cheaper, lower-performing format?
Sony has been on the losing end of this sort of contest before, with VHS defeating the technically superior Beta format. But I would hesitate before applying historical precedent here: during the original VHS wars, customers were pretty much oblivious to issues of picture quality. The term "home theatre" had not yet entered the popular lexicon, and most people were blissfully unaware of video and quality issues. Even simple things like subwoofers for home theatre were considered specialty items, unheard-of in mainstream electronics stores. But today, who's going to buy a hidef DVD player unless he's interested in video quality?
It's going to be a very interesting ride.
Posted: 2005-08-23 03:13am
by Dahak
Darth Wong wrote:Alyeska wrote:Here is an interesting little tidbit. The DVD consortium is apparently going to pick HD-DVD as their choice of the next standard and put their stamp of approval on it. This could pretty much cement the Toshiba format as the winner.
Not by a long shot. Customers in stores don't give a shit what the DVD Consortium says. What matters is which movies are coming out on which format, how expensive the players are, and how well they perform.
Blu-Ray, by offering nearly twice the theoretical maximum capacity, looks like it will be the technically superior format. HD-DVD may well be cheaper. So the question boils down to: will customers go for the more expensive, higher-performing format, or the cheaper, lower-performing format?
What's also a big factor here is the DVD producers. They can re-use their facilities for HD-DVD with slight modifications, while they would have to build completely new production lines. If they can help it in any way, I guess they'll prefer to do the switch without much investment.
And the Blu-Ray disc needs IIRC a cartridge to be durable enough.
Posted: 2005-08-23 03:17am
by Akaramu Shinja
With Sony pretending they made DVDs popular thanks to PS2 (yea right
) they're probably counting on a repeat performance with the PS3. Without an opposing console to support either, maybe they've got a shot. Regardless of that, I don't think the consumer end will care as much if most all new players support both formats, which seems likely in this day and age. If they didn't, I'd be rather wary to commit to either, I don't want a collection to become useless in a decade.
Posted: 2005-08-23 04:35am
by Silver Paladin
Darth Wong wrote:Not by a long shot. Customers in stores don't give a shit what the DVD Consortium says. What matters is which movies are coming out on which format, how expensive the players are, and how well they perform.
Blu-Ray, by offering nearly twice the theoretical maximum capacity, looks like it will be the technically superior format. HD-DVD may well be cheaper. So the question boils down to: will customers go for the more expensive, higher-performing format, or the cheaper, lower-performing format?
Sony has been on the losing end of this sort of contest before, with VHS defeating the technically superior Beta format. But I would hesitate before applying historical precedent here: during the original VHS wars, customers were pretty much oblivious to issues of picture quality. The term "home theatre" had not yet entered the popular lexicon, and most people were blissfully unaware of video and quality issues. Even simple things like subwoofers for home theatre were considered specialty items, unheard-of in mainstream electronics stores. But today, who's going to buy a hidef DVD player unless he's interested in video quality?
It's going to be a very interesting ride.
One reason to why Sony lost the Beta Vs. VHS war (from what I read) was that Sony tried to exert control over what could be sold on Beta and what could not.
Namely pornography. As a result, porn went to VHS, and that's was a large blow to the Beta audience.
That's also why Sony "regrets" that there is porn on UMD, but they are not doing anything to stop it, because of what happened when they tried to control content on their proprietary formats.
Posted: 2005-08-23 09:02am
by phongn
Most content owners seem to be looking at BD-ROM instead of HD-DVD, actually.
Posted: 2005-08-23 12:11pm
by Darth Wong
Regarding the pornography angle, I wouldn't hold my breath for HD-porn. Most porn is still shot on camcorders and then transferred to DVD, which is why the vast majority of porn DVDs aren't really that sharp even for standard DVD. I can count the number of DVDs I've seen using 16x9 mode on the fingers of one hand.
Posted: 2005-08-23 12:13pm
by phongn
Darth Wong wrote:Regarding the pornography angle, I wouldn't hold my breath for HD-porn. Most porn is still shot on camcorders and then transferred to DVD, which is why the vast majority of porn DVDs aren't really that sharp even for standard DVD. I can count the number of DVDs I've seen using 16x9 mode on the fingers of one hand.
Well, HD cameras have reached the prosumer cost level (~3-5K) which may well be affordable to those producers.
Posted: 2005-08-23 12:34pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Silver Paladin wrote:One reason to why Sony lost the Beta Vs. VHS war (from what I read) was that Sony tried to exert control over what could be sold on Beta and what could not.
From what I've read, you're close: it was concerning manufacturers rather than media, specifically Sony's difficulty establishing licenses for the format.
In truth I think Betamax's failure was due to multiple factors rather than just one or two exclusives.
Posted: 2005-08-23 01:13pm
by Arthur_Tuxedo
Both formats are laden with a bunch of DRM bullshit, neither format is a big leap over current DVD technology, and there are several technologies that seem to be just around the corner with hundreds of gigs or even terrabytes of storage. Given that it took almost 5 years for DVDs to become popular, I wouldn't be surprised if neither of these formats ever become mainstream.
Posted: 2005-08-23 02:34pm
by Genii Lodus
I think the lack of a unified format will really harm uptake of 'next-gen' DVD. A lot of people remember the Beta vs VHS farce and will be reluctant to spend their money until a winner is decided - and if nobody's buying who knows how long that could take?
I think its a similar situation to DVD recorders which, while not particularly popular or widespread, only really took off once multiformat recorders became available.
Posted: 2005-08-23 02:38pm
by Darth Wong
Which kind of DRM will be built into this format? Is it just something like the CSS that's currently built into DVDs and can eventually be cracked once someone gets a few keys? Or is it something like the failed Divx standard (the pay-per-view system developed by Circuit City before the modern Divx codec which was named as an ironic poke at the previous standard)?
If you have to order hidef DVDs which are encoded to work only with your particular player, this technology will fall flat on its face. Nobody will buy it. But if it's relatively transparent, then it could take off, albeit slowly.
Posted: 2005-08-23 02:59pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Genii Lodus wrote:I think its a similar situation to DVD recorders which, while not particularly popular or widespread, only really took off once multiformat recorders became available.
Which would have been avoided if there was only a single DVD-R format in the first place.
Posted: 2005-08-23 09:12pm
by phongn
Darth Wong wrote:Which kind of DRM will be built into this format? Is it just something like the CSS that's currently built into DVDs and can eventually be cracked once someone gets a few keys? Or is it something like the failed Divx standard (the pay-per-view system developed by Circuit City before the modern Divx codec which was named as an ironic poke at the previous standard)?
BD-ROM is protected by the Advanced Access Content System -- which uses with AES. The encryption scheme can be changed at-will and BD-ROM producing devices are required to detect a watermark and refuse to work if needed. It isn't a pay-per-view scheme, though, but a system designed to make copying a royal pain in the ass. Also, to view these disks in HD mode your monitor must be capable of receiving a digital datastream protected by HDCP.
Yes, that means existing monitors will not display HD content with those boxes unless someone defeats HDCP.
If you have to order hidef DVDs which are encoded to work only with your particular player, this technology will fall flat on its face. Nobody will buy it. But if it's relatively transparent, then it could take off, albeit slowly.
Oh, it will be relatively transparent.