Page 1 of 1
40k battlefield idea.
Posted: 2006-02-03 02:55am
by The Yosemite Bear
which of these two monster battle fields would you most want to play with.
1. an exact 28mm scale replica of Gettysburg and Imperial Guard units are allowed to deploy on top of spyglass hill.
2. an exact 28mm scale replica of Stalingrad, snipers may be considered IC and deploy anywhere.
Posted: 2006-02-03 03:14am
by DPDarkPrimus
Stalingrad is not only more befitting of a 40k setting, but it'd make for much more interesting gameplay as well.
Gettysburg was really just a huge field.
Posted: 2006-02-03 05:29am
by Spanky The Dolphin
Stalingrad, because playing on a field would be dull-ass boring: might as well just play on an empty tabletop.
Posted: 2006-02-03 05:49am
by The Yosemite Bear
actually there is a lot of topography at Gettysburg you darn iowans. Infact the North Held the Highground, the south held some forests, and there was a small town involved in that battle.
Posted: 2006-02-03 05:52am
by Spanky The Dolphin
It would still be relatively boring and dull compared to a city.
Posted: 2006-02-03 05:56am
by The Yosemite Bear
well spy glass hill, two round tops used for the artillery, the town of gettysburg, all the farms, the rivers, the stone fences, the forest which the south used for cover, several ridges,
Posted: 2006-02-03 05:57am
by Spanky The Dolphin
I'm getting the impression that I simply didn't supply the answer you wanted...
But allow me to repeat myself: Stalingrad is more interesting than Gettysburg.
Posted: 2006-02-03 07:25am
by Azazal
Wait a few months for the new City of Death supliment and then you're all set for Stalingrad