Primitive Question: Why Isn't Music Put on DVDs?
Posted: 2006-03-26 05:57pm
Why not simply (?) put music on DVDs instead of making new disc formats?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=87846
But why? Wouldn't it be cheaper to use all the existing DVD factories to make music DVDs instead of building up the infrastructure to make a whole new format?phongn wrote:DVD Audio never really took off.
Oh, I thought it was still going on.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Because that involves having DVD players to play your audio. Since we all have CD players for that, you see why it's a bit of a pain to expect everyone to buy new players for questionable increase in audio quality and size of albums.
This is one format war where DVD Audio and SACD mutually killed off one another, rather than have one the victor like Betamax vs. VHS.
If you read my post, you'd understand.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:What the hell do audio DVDs have to do with a video format war?
Because I didn't know the battle between SACD and DVD Audio was over.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Yeah, my mistake. I'm also puzzled why Tit is talking about a new audio format when one isn't needed, wanted, or really planned.
You could, but then you'd have to convert the entire market over to DVD audio discs, which means new players, new discs, and phasing out the CD. Which costs money. Which means the record companies won't get around to it.StarshipTitanic wrote:But why? Wouldn't it be cheaper to use all the existing DVD factories to make music DVDs instead of building up the infrastructure to make a whole new format?
Having heard DVD-A and SACD discs, I have to say that CDs are broke. However, that was on a stereo system that costs as much as a nice car. On an average stereo system it's pretty much impossible to hear any improvements, in which case you are correct, it ain't broke for the vast majority of users. Personally I want all my audio in at least 96kHz/24 bit resolution, but the way things are going I might as well wish for the master tapes cause it just ain't happening.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Why would you need a new format? CDs do the job, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Besides, the trend is towards solid state players now rather than yet another damn disc based system. Music is mainly now in the form of digital files in cyberspace as CDs and the like are trumped by downloading and HDD/flash based portbale music players.
Another thing is that many people aren't interested in the quality that DVDs can offer - most people I know can't tell the difference from 320 to 128 bitrate, I hardly think any of them will shell out the extra money when they can't tell the difference.DPDarkPrimus wrote:DVD Audio is hardly dead. I purchased a DVD-Audio version of the Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Soundtrack, and that was only released last year.
DVD Audio is all about high-quality sound. It's got a 5.1 mix as well as a stereo version, and is playable in normal DVD players as well as DVD Audio players. It also has ZIPs of the songs in a couple lossless formats.
And last year Gorillaz released their latest album Demon Days on LP in addition to compact disc, but stuff like that is only considered niche. You don't see most groups and artists on the Top 40 offering material on LPs since the mid 1980s.DPDarkPrimus wrote:DVD Audio is hardly dead. I purchased a DVD-Audio version of the Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory Soundtrack, and that was only released last year.
Except that nobody really cares in the long run concerning widespread consumer acceptance and adoption. In those regards, both DVD-A and SACD are dead.DVD Audio is all about high-quality sound. It's got a 5.1 mix as well as a stereo version, and is playable in normal DVD players as well as DVD Audio players. It also has ZIPs of the songs in a couple lossless formats.