Page 1 of 1
Bearshare shuts down
Posted: 2006-05-06 03:12pm
by Ace Pace
The linky
Online file-sharing service BearShare, along with operators Free Peers Inc., is packing it up due to a $30 million settlement with the recording industry. The conditions of the settlement were agreed to by the P2P company to avoid further copyright infringement litigation.
Free Peers also agreed not to set up another unlicensed music services. As a federal judge reviews the settlement for final approval, Free Peers has agreed to sell the BearShare technology rights, domain name and user data to iMesh Inc.
New York-based iMesh shelled out $4.1 million to the RIAA in 2004 in a file-swapping settlement. In 2005, the company went back online as a licensed service.
BearShare was among several P2P service to receive cease-and-desist letters from the RIAA in September of last year. Others include Warez P2P, Limewire, eDonkey, and Soulseek, all of whom have not yet reached a settlement.
"IMesh is committed to transitioning the compelling experience of [peer-to-peer file sharing] to an authorized marketplace," said Chief Executive Robert Summer.
The RIAA, pleased with the outcome, lauded last year's Supreme Court ruling against Grokster as the catalyst for the settlement and settlements to come.
Posted: 2006-05-06 03:15pm
by nickolay1
Good riddance to spyware-infested shit.
Posted: 2006-05-06 03:25pm
by Uraniun235
I didn't even know BearShare existed.
Posted: 2006-05-06 03:27pm
by Ace Pace
Others include Warez P2P, Limewire, eDonkey, and Soulseek, all of whom have not yet reached a settlement.
Thats the part that interests me.
Posted: 2006-05-06 03:38pm
by Ace Pace
More information.
Another linky
Illegal peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharers across the world faced a fresh wave of legal actions yesterday as the recording industry announced an escalation of its campaign against digital music piracy. The latest actions come with a new warning to parents to check what their children are doing online, as they could face financial penalties if their children access illegal material.
The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and its affiliate national bodies announced nearly 2,000 new legal cases against individuals uploading "large amounts" of copyrighted music.
The actions target users of all the major unauthorised P2P networks, including FastTrack (Kazaa), Gnutella (BearShare), eDonkey, DirectConnect, BitTorrent, Limewire, WinMX and SoulSeek.
The actions are being launched in Austria, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong SAR, Iceland, Italy, Portugal, Sweden and Switzerland.
IFPI announced that it is bringing actions in Portugal for the first time. Sales of physical music in Portugal have slumped by 40 percent in the last four years. Much of this is accounted for by the phenomenal rise in illegal file-sharing, especially among college students.
"This is a significant escalation in our worldwide campaign against illegal file-sharing," said John Kennedy, the chairman and chief executive of IFPI. "This campaign started in major music markets where sales were falling sharply; now these legal actions have spread to smaller markets in countries like Portugal where it is not an exaggeration to say the future of the whole national market, and local artists, is at stake."
The organization went on to point out that, in a development that could be mirrored in other E.U. countries, thousands of file-sharers in Denmark could now find their online connections cut off by their internet service providers. The ruling follows more than 130 injunctions taken out in France that led to internet users who were illegally file-sharing being disconnected by their ISPs.
In Italy, a series of raids against individual file-sharers and servers in the past fortnight has led to the seizure of more than 70 computers in the search for evidence. Each server had around a thousand users and 30 terabytes of shared music. The Italian authorities also found a large amount of child pornography on one of the servers.
The latest wave of cases, covering actions launched yesterday or brought in recent months, takes the total number of legal actions against uploaders to more than 5,500 in 18 countries outside the U.S.
A wide variety of people are finding themselves on the receiving end of legal action and paying large financial penalties. They include a Finnish carpenter, a British postman, a Czech IT manager, a German judge, a French chef, a British local councillor and a retired German couple. A large number of cases involve men aged between 20 and 35 and parents who have allowed their children to use P2P file-sharing sites hosting illegal content.
Mary Louise Morris, head of education and awareness at international children's charity Childnet International, said: "In our experience, parents are not aware of what their children are doing online and don't know how to begin to ask the right questions. On these file-sharing sites, its not only illegal activities like copyright infringement that children might be participating in, but also viewing highly inappropriate materials as well as compromising the security of the home computer. Parents need to get involved with what their children are doing online and take a more active role in guiding them in their use of the internet."
Hundreds of people have already paid the price for illegally file-sharing copyrighted material, with average legal settlements of Euro 2,633, IFPI claimed.
LA times
*snip*
Since then, the firms behind i2Hub and WinMX have shut down. The Grokster file-sharing service, which was sued by Hollywood film studios and recording companies in 2001, agreed last fall to a $50-million settlement.
The operators of Warez P2P, LimeWire, eDonkey and Soulseek have yet to shut down or settle. The firms behind Kazaa and Morpheus are defendants in a copyright infringement case pending in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.
Posted: 2006-05-06 03:47pm
by InnocentBystander
At what point are we allowed to classify the RIAA as a terrorist organization?
Posted: 2006-05-06 04:45pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
WinMX? They shut down ages ago...
Posted: 2006-05-06 05:19pm
by Pezzoni
Those services were never really any good anyway, unless you liked virii and spyware.
The RIAA are still cunts though.
Posted: 2006-05-06 05:37pm
by BloodAngel
I like how they're moving to stop DirectConnect and BitTorrent, when they aren't even networks in the first place. (with the exception of DHT for BT, but that's completely different)
Posted: 2006-05-06 05:51pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Bah, good riddance to bad rubbish. Gnutella was never a good network anyway with all the search-spammers, WhenU and New.Net spyware, and absolute lack of anti-hash-spoofing...
I much prefer KCEasy and Ares anyway.
Posted: 2006-05-06 05:55pm
by Solauren
For Every network they strike down, 2 more based in foreign countries without stupid copyright laws will take it's place
Posted: 2006-05-06 05:57pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Solauren wrote:For Every network they strike down, 2 more based in foreign countries without stupid copyright laws will take it's place
The more you tighten your grip, RIAA, the more P2P music will slip through your fingers...
Posted: 2006-05-06 06:30pm
by Manus Celer Dei
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Bah, good riddance to bad rubbish. Gnutella was never a good network anyway with all the search-spammers, WhenU and New.Net spyware, and absolute lack of anti-hash-spoofing...
I much prefer KCEasy and Ares anyway.
Uh, don't KCEasy and Ares both use the Gnuttella network?
Posted: 2006-05-06 08:09pm
by Admiral Valdemar
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Solauren wrote:For Every network they strike down, 2 more based in foreign countries without stupid copyright laws will take it's place
The more you tighten your grip, RIAA, the more P2P music will slip through your fingers...
No, more like the rise of anonymouse and pseudononymous networks will be self-evident. It's hard to prove file sharing of such content happened when you can't tell whether any one person hosted that file or acted as a node. Plausible deniability and high-end AES ciphers along with friend-to-friend networks will simply laugh at the RIAA and MPAA and their ilk who, without some major law changes that would practically piss on freedom of speech anf the Internet, just sit and watch this happen.
Posted: 2006-05-07 05:11am
by Lazarus
I used to use BearShare about a year ago, now I've switched to Limewire. Are there any major flaws in LW? Is there a better alternative? I also use BitComet.
Posted: 2006-05-07 12:54pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Manus Celer Dei wrote:Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Bah, good riddance to bad rubbish. Gnutella was never a good network anyway with all the search-spammers, WhenU and New.Net spyware, and absolute lack of anti-hash-spoofing...
I much prefer KCEasy and Ares anyway.
Uh, don't KCEasy and Ares both use the Gnuttella network?
Ares has its own network, and KCEasy connects to Gnutella, Ares, and OpenNap. I'm moving away from KCEasy because of Gnutella's dubious value, Ares' network not liking KCEasy, and OpenNap's truly tiny network.
Admiral Valdemar wrote:Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Solauren wrote:For Every network they strike down, 2 more based in foreign countries without stupid copyright laws will take it's place
The more you tighten your grip, RIAA, the more P2P music will slip through your fingers...
No, more like the rise of anonymouse and pseudononymous networks will be self-evident. It's hard to prove file sharing of such content happened when you can't tell whether any one person hosted that file or acted as a node. Plausible deniability and high-end AES ciphers along with friend-to-friend networks will simply laugh at the RIAA and MPAA and their ilk who, without some major law changes that would practically piss on freedom of speech anf the Internet, just sit and watch this happen.
And it's precisely what we're starting to see evolve already.
Lazarus wrote:I used to use BearShare about a year ago, now I've switched to Limewire. Are there any major flaws in LW? Is there a better alternative? I also use BitComet.
LW's ok if you're willing to put up with Gnutella's bullshit. I recommend Ares for files in the .5-15megabyte range, and Bittorrent for anything bigger (BitComet's ok; I use uTorrent).
If you're looking for small files (particularly JPEGS, I.E. porn), you're better off with Google Image Search to find TGPs. I invariably get nothing but pics consisting of nothing but a website URL instead of what the filename promises. 'Hot Gay American Indian in Spandex 0001.jpg' is too good to be true, especially when you find 'Redhead Lesbian Twins with Giant Clits 0457.jpg' with the exact same fucking filesize from the exact same fucking IP address...
ZIPs and EXEs: Get a good virus scanner, and don't trust
anything. ISOs are usually okay.
Peerguardian's okay for keeping assholes like the RIAA and spyware vendors out of your stash.
Here's a good website for general tips on shields and defense.
HTH
Posted: 2006-05-08 01:36pm
by Lazarus
Something I've been wondering about is how do anti piracy organisations discover pirates? I have images of a voice suddenly coming out my speakers 'STEP AWAY FROM THE KEYBOARD! DROP YOUR CUTLASS AND REMOVE YOUR EYEPATCH! A SWAT TEAM IS EN ROUTE'.
Posted: 2006-05-08 01:46pm
by GrandMasterTerwynn
Lazarus wrote:Something I've been wondering about is how do anti piracy organisations discover pirates? I have images of a voice suddenly coming out my speakers 'STEP AWAY FROM THE KEYBOARD! DROP YOUR CUTLASS AND REMOVE YOUR EYEPATCH! A SWAT TEAM IS EN ROUTE'.
Simple, they trawl the P2P networks, signing up as users. Then they search for users who have a lot of copyrighted material to download. That, or they have their pet accounts offer spiked versions of popularly pirated works and follow the trail from there.