Page 1 of 2

Firefox To Drop Support For Windows 98, Me

Posted: 2006-06-13 11:36am
by Bounty
Linky
Mozilla Corp. will drop support for the almost-obsolete Windows 98 and Windows Millennium operating systems when it releases Firefox 3.0 sometime in 2007, the company said last week.

Surprisingly, the decision -- which closely followed a move by Microsoft not to patch a critical bug in Windows 98 and Millennium -- was met with some resistance.

One contributor to Bugzilla, the database of fixes for Firefox and other Mozilla software, immediately added a "counter bug" entry questioning the decision.

"Mozilla is running on some other platforms having smaller numbers, so why kill Win98?" wrote someone identified as Hermann Schwab. "If you want to kill it, please don't do it silently in the backyard by checking in something in the trunk, but do a survey about market shares of OS in the new installed (or updated) Firefox."

Mozilla developer Gervase Markham, however, proposed knocking out support for Windows 98 and Millennium not with next year's Firefox 3.0, but starting with Firefox 2.0, which is scheduled to release in August.

"The key point is that after July 11th, 2006, Microsoft will no longer be providing even critical security updates for any of the Win 9x family," Markham wrote on his blog. "I argue that continuing to support these operating systems in a browser or other Internet-facing product after vendor security support ceases is actually irresponsible, because it gives users the idea that they can continue to safely use those operating systems for surfing the Internet."

Users commenting on Markham's blog were almost unanimously against his idea. A sample was a message by someone identified only as "Alfonso."

"If Firefox 2 works in 98 I can't understand a good reason to say [to] those users, 'Hey, we won't give you this version. We know that it works, but we don't like your OS, so move away and leave us alone.'"

Posted: 2006-06-13 11:48am
by General Zod
Considering how long windows 3.x took to be phased out, it's about time everyone's working towards phasing out 9.x. Although it's likely to be some time before everyone finally converts to a more modern Windows version.

Posted: 2006-06-13 12:15pm
by Admiral Valdemar
'98 and ME should have died a lot earlier, they really were PoS OSs and anyone still using them probably deserves the viruses and system faults associated with. XP is going to be an interesting one. The extended time between new systems which is an anomaly for MS is going to make phasing XP out a lot harder. Most use 2000 or XP in the workplace and some are just upgrading to XP from a previous version. I hear MS wants XP to retire around 2009-10 and then Vista is the primary workhorse, but whether industry will go with it is another thing. The other operating system vendors are leaping at this chance to sell themselves.

Posted: 2006-06-13 12:39pm
by Netko
"If Firefox 2 works in 98 I can't understand a good reason to say [to] those users, 'Hey, we won't give you this version. We know that it works, but we don't like your OS, so move away and leave us alone.'"
Yes, because there are absolutly no changes in APIs between Win '98 and XP. No siree, no effort at all to remain guaranteeing support for an OS that was supplanted by much superior versions 6 years ago, and will relativly soon be 10 years old. :roll:

I think what we are seeing is a rift between the core developers who want to create a polished end user product with all what that entails (including officialy supporting only current OSes) and open source ideology crusading contributors that want yet another "1 billion options plus it installs with arhaic command line options on a system created and used by me, my brother and our dog" program. I'm stereotyping a bit, and there are also likely a lot of (majority?) contributors/developers that don't give a shit either way, but essentialy it is what this boils down to. If it weren't for the exceptional extension system I think we would be seeing a large volume of complaints from the second group even earlier then now.

Posted: 2006-06-13 12:45pm
by DPDarkPrimus
This is troubling for me, because the family computer runs ME, and I have no fucking idea how I am going to convince my mother to spend $100+ on a copy of Windows XP and having to do a complete reinstall on that aging beast sitting in our living room.

Don't say "just get a new computer". She would only replace it if it literally stopped working. And in that case, I'd have to go bargin hunting and assemble the thing piece by piece for like $200 total. :P

Posted: 2006-06-13 12:47pm
by Edi
Windows 98 wasn't very good, but it worked decently enough for gaming and such purposes as long as it was appropriately tweaked. It was rather maintenance intensive, though, and the newer ones do kick its ass in all respects.

I've got Win98 as a secondary operating system for playing old games that don't work in XP.

The less said about ME, the better. That was a truly piece of shit operating system, and in my current workplace we're adopting the policy that whenever we get an ME machine in for repairs and the prospect of reinstalls comes up, the customer is getting an upgrade to Win98 SE. Those will work just fine when you send them out the door. The ME machines come back within two days. Repeatedly. There's just no fucking way to get that OS working as it's supposed to at all, no matter what you try.

Edi

Posted: 2006-06-13 12:50pm
by General Zod
DPDarkPrimus wrote:This is troubling for me, because the family computer runs ME, and I have no fucking idea how I am going to convince my mother to spend $100+ on a copy of Windows XP and having to do a complete reinstall on that aging beast sitting in our living room.

Don't say "just get a new computer". She would only replace it if it literally stopped working. And in that case, I'd have to go bargin hunting and assemble the thing piece by piece for like $200 total. :P
You could always just convince her to find someone with a copy of Windows 2000 available on eBay or such. No need to go full out for XP when 2k will do the trick for the most part.

Posted: 2006-06-13 01:05pm
by DPDarkPrimus
General Zod wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:This is troubling for me, because the family computer runs ME, and I have no fucking idea how I am going to convince my mother to spend $100+ on a copy of Windows XP and having to do a complete reinstall on that aging beast sitting in our living room.

Don't say "just get a new computer". She would only replace it if it literally stopped working. And in that case, I'd have to go bargin hunting and assemble the thing piece by piece for like $200 total. :P
You could always just convince her to find someone with a copy of Windows 2000 available on eBay or such. No need to go full out for XP when 2k will do the trick for the most part.
Windows 2000! Hahaha, of course! :)

Posted: 2006-06-13 01:10pm
by Soontir C'boath
General Zod wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:This is troubling for me, because the family computer runs ME, and I have no fucking idea how I am going to convince my mother to spend $100+ on a copy of Windows XP and having to do a complete reinstall on that aging beast sitting in our living room. Don't say "just get a new computer". She would only replace it if it literally stopped working. And in that case, I'd have to go bargin hunting and assemble the thing piece by piece for like $200 total. :P
You could always just convince her to find someone with a copy of Windows 2000 available on eBay or such. No need to go full out for XP when 2k will do the trick for the most part.
Or check if you or your friends' college have a deal with Microsoft selling Windows XP. My university sold them to students for seven dollars.

Posted: 2006-06-13 01:14pm
by Silver Paladin
Soontir C'boath wrote:
General Zod wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:This is troubling for me, because the family computer runs ME, and I have no fucking idea how I am going to convince my mother to spend $100+ on a copy of Windows XP and having to do a complete reinstall on that aging beast sitting in our living room. Don't say "just get a new computer". She would only replace it if it literally stopped working. And in that case, I'd have to go bargin hunting and assemble the thing piece by piece for like $200 total. :P
You could always just convince her to find someone with a copy of Windows 2000 available on eBay or such. No need to go full out for XP when 2k will do the trick for the most part.
Or check if you or your friends' college have a deal with Microsoft selling Windows XP. My university sold them to students for seven dollars.
Ours was free as long as you brought in your own CD to burn. They had some deal with MS that allowed students to burn the ISOs onto a CD.

Posted: 2006-06-13 01:17pm
by Netko
Hell, if it is that old you are likely to get a better computer (just the box) for a 100$, with licence included hopefully.

Anyway, XP Home is below 100$, even at retail prices (IIRC).

Posted: 2006-06-13 01:37pm
by Edi
DPDarkPrimus wrote:This is troubling for me, because the family computer runs ME, and I have no fucking idea how I am going to convince my mother to spend $100+ on a copy of Windows XP and having to do a complete reinstall on that aging beast sitting in our living room.

Don't say "just get a new computer". She would only replace it if it literally stopped working. And in that case, I'd have to go bargin hunting and assemble the thing piece by piece for like $200 total. :P
If you're in the unenviable position of having to maintain an ME install, do yourself a favor and put a Win98 on it instead. Microsoft has a policy where you can freely downgrade your system to an earlier OS than the one you have a license for without needing to pay for another licese, so it'd be all legal too. At least here it is, as I learned today. )8 might not be all that great an improvement, but it IS an improvement compared to ME. Using the right software with it and exercising some basic caution will keep the system clean enough.

Edi

Posted: 2006-06-13 05:28pm
by Uraniun235
Considering how long windows 3.x took to be phased out, it's about time everyone's working towards phasing out 9.x. Although it's likely to be some time before everyone finally converts to a more modern Windows version.
We might - might - be upgrading all Win98 boxes on our network at work (I work for a school district) to Win2K this summer. And just two years ago there were still teacher's computers running Win95.

Posted: 2006-06-13 06:10pm
by Pezzoni
Seems fair enough - 98 and ME (especially) are vastly inferior operating systems to 2000 or XP. Do MS even still support 98, come to think of it?

Posted: 2006-06-13 06:22pm
by General Zod
Pezzoni wrote:Seems fair enough - 98 and ME (especially) are vastly inferior operating systems to 2000 or XP. Do MS even still support 98, come to think of it?
At the moment they do, however that support is scheduled to end July 11th of this year.

Posted: 2006-06-14 08:02am
by Jadetear
General Zod wrote:At the moment they do, however that support is scheduled to end July 11th of this year.
Yep, Usually Microsoft only supports 2 to 3 versions of os behind that they have. I am not surprised that Firefox would do the same thing. After all there are some huge difference in the OS between the versions.

Posted: 2006-06-14 08:19am
by DPDarkPrimus
God, I talked to my mom yesterday about this. Just like I thought, she's balking at the idea of even spending $50 on the damn computer.

Posted: 2006-06-14 08:27am
by Jadetear
Well PDarkPrimus, I guess you may have to do the plug and pray method then. Install it and hope it works. Even though it won't be supported it will probably still work. Maybe.

Posted: 2006-06-14 09:31am
by Darth Wong
DPDarkPrimus wrote:God, I talked to my mom yesterday about this. Just like I thought, she's balking at the idea of even spending $50 on the damn computer.
Can't you play your recent bout with ulcerative colitis for pity points?

Posted: 2006-06-14 09:41am
by DPDarkPrimus
Darth Wong wrote:
DPDarkPrimus wrote:God, I talked to my mom yesterday about this. Just like I thought, she's balking at the idea of even spending $50 on the damn computer.
Can't you play your recent bout with ulcerative colitis for pity points?
Heh. Afraid not- she bought me a magazine subscription. Well, she's going to pay me what the subscription cost, anyway.

She'll buy Win2k- it's just going to take a little more nudging. Pointing out that July 11th is the deadline for support will probably help.

Posted: 2006-06-14 09:45am
by brianeyci
DPDarkPrimus wrote:God, I talked to my mom yesterday about this. Just like I thought, she's balking at the idea of even spending $50 on the damn computer.
I hope I don't sound condescending, and I know you're sick and have an illness right now, but honestly a computer's a luxury item and if you need it depending where you live there's libraries and campuses and friends and...

...well short answer, depending how old you are, if you're well enough, get a job at McDonalds or something if you've never had a job (I'm assuming you have not or else 200 bucks would not be a problem...) Then one of two things will happen. Either one hundred bucks will be chump change to you, or you'll start thinking like your mom :P. Either way you'll be happy, either you'll get a computer or you won't want one.

And if you really really want a cheap solution, there's thrift stores. Walking around in one I can see really old pieces of crap for under one hundred bucks, old Pentiums that could probably run Windows 98. The only thing to watch for is older monitors might not support high refresh rates and anything below 85 Hz really burns your eyes after a few hours of writing/essay writing/playing retro games lol.

Brian

Posted: 2006-06-14 09:48am
by DPDarkPrimus
I don't know how you come to the conclusion that I/my family is in a dire financial crisis from my mentioning that my mother is a total spendthrift.

As I mentioned in my hospitalization thread, I have a job. It's just that I'm not working right now because of recovering from the colitis flareup. Hopefully I'll be able to start working as soon as next week- I have a doctor's appointment tomorrow, so we'll see if he gives me the okay.

Posted: 2006-06-14 09:54am
by brianeyci
DPDarkPrimus wrote:I don't know how you come to the conclusion that I/my family is in a dire financial crisis from my mentioning that my mother is a total spendthrift.
Well then it's a win win. Get your own and charge her 4 bucks an hour like at an Internet cafe! :wink:.

Besides I never said you were in dire financial straits. I could easily pay for a brand spanking new computer, but I'm not and I'm gonna look for a computer in a thrift store if HP are losers and don't fix my laptop :).

Brian

Posted: 2006-06-14 10:05am
by DPDarkPrimus
Man, my computer tower wouldn't even fit under the desk we use to house the family computer. :P

Like I said, she'll end up buying it, just grudgingly.