About cap ship killer torp weapons

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Rightous Fist Of Heaven
Jedi Master
Posts: 1201
Joined: 2002-09-29 05:31pm
Location: Finland

About cap ship killer torp weapons

Post by Rightous Fist Of Heaven »

I need some info of these. I heard numbers around 15-50GT being thrown around for the anti cap ship torpedoes that B-Wings for one can carry.

Can anyone post some background info of these and more info about the yields?
"The ones they built at the height of nuclear weapons could knock the earth out of its orbit" - Physics expert Envy in reference to the hydrogen bombs built during the cold war.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

I don't have information, but I'm guessing those are a brand of the "advanced proton torpedoes" carried on board B-Wings. The B-Wing was designed to knocked out light Imperial frigates such as the Nebelon B Escort Frigate.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Re: About cap ship killer torp weapons

Post by Howedar »

Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:I need some info of these. I heard numbers around 15-50GT being thrown around for the anti cap ship torpedoes that B-Wings for one can carry.

Can anyone post some background info of these and more info about the yields?
They are just speculation AFAIK, but they must exist, else B-wings would be no threat to capships. We know they are, hence GT-level torpedos.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22462
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

10 GT seems to be the minium nessary to threaten Frigtens and smaller

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

Well, divide that by two, since most torpedoes seem designed to launch in pairs...
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

I got them from the Isards revenge bit and Bean's work on shields.

Bean worked out 40 TT per section particle. Divide that by 80, the concussions the vic could launch in a volley, and you get 500 GT capital grade Concussion Missiles. Since we know from EGWT that upgraded CMs are equal to PTs of a lower scale, this gives fighters 500 GT torps. For an X-wing squad attack run, this ends up at 12 TT, enough to make a small hole in a section of the shields, which is what is described in the novels.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

If we restrict ourselves to published specs, the SW2ICS indicates that Slave-1's missiles are roughly 12 GT. And these are highly maneuverable, fast missiles, not like the ponderous "space bombs" and other heavy weapons.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Darth Wong wrote:If we restrict ourselves to published specs, the SW2ICS indicates that Slave-1's missiles are roughly 12 GT. And these are highly maneuverable, fast missiles, not like the ponderous "space bombs" and other heavy weapons.
IIRC 12 gigatons is what the mines are listed as, the missiles where 190 megatons or so.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Correct, the missiles were 190MT. One can surmise that anti-capship missiles would have bigger warheads and less maneuverability, though.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Phil Skayhan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 941
Joined: 2002-07-08 10:31pm
Contact:

Thoughts?

Post by Phil Skayhan »

During the battle of Endor

http://www.skayhan.net/Torp.htm

Does SWICS2 shed any light on these?

It might be interesting to compare the speed of these to the Slave I missile....
User avatar
Rightous Fist Of Heaven
Jedi Master
Posts: 1201
Joined: 2002-09-29 05:31pm
Location: Finland

Post by Rightous Fist Of Heaven »

Allright thanks. And about the Slave 1 missiles, the biggest CM and PT versions carried by bombers are likely a lot more powerfull and bigger since the missile Slave 1 fired in AOTC was actually quite small.
"The ones they built at the height of nuclear weapons could knock the earth out of its orbit" - Physics expert Envy in reference to the hydrogen bombs built during the cold war.
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:Allright thanks. And about the Slave 1 missiles, the biggest CM and PT versions carried by bombers are likely a lot more powerfull and bigger since the missile Slave 1 fired in AOTC was actually quite small.
"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?"-Master Yoda

I get your point, but it's not necessarily true. Modern missiles are smaller than old ones yet more powerful. It all depends on the evidence, and (unfortunately) size-yield ratios are hard to prove.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
Rightous Fist Of Heaven
Jedi Master
Posts: 1201
Joined: 2002-09-29 05:31pm
Location: Finland

Post by Rightous Fist Of Heaven »

The Dark wrote:
Rightous Fist Of Heaven wrote:Allright thanks. And about the Slave 1 missiles, the biggest CM and PT versions carried by bombers are likely a lot more powerfull and bigger since the missile Slave 1 fired in AOTC was actually quite small.
"Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?"-Master Yoda

I get your point, but it's not necessarily true. Modern missiles are smaller than old ones yet more powerful. It all depends on the evidence, and (unfortunately) size-yield ratios are hard to prove.
Yup but if the cap killer versions of PT's work on the same principle as the normal ones then there must be more reacting material on them or something to increase the yield.
"The ones they built at the height of nuclear weapons could knock the earth out of its orbit" - Physics expert Envy in reference to the hydrogen bombs built during the cold war.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

The heavy warheads also don't appear to have as extensive a range....the missile fired by Slave 1 was highly intelligent, very manuverable, AND followed Obi-Wan's fighter for over multi-tens-of-km ranges IMHO or so through the asteroid belt at high speed.

Space bombs, etc would appear to be used only at limited ranges in the official data, really for close-in strafing runs.

I'd say that SW heavy missiles are intended for use against capital ships when they've lost part of their shields and roll over to expose the opposite, still-shielded side. Fighters can loop around and bomb the unshielded area of the ship, hoping to inflict significant damage.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:The heavy warheads also don't appear to have as extensive a range....the missile fired by Slave 1 was highly intelligent, very manuverable, AND followed Obi-Wan's fighter for over multi-tens-of-km ranges IMHO or so through the asteroid belt at high speed.

Space bombs, etc would appear to be used only at limited ranges in the official data, really for close-in strafing runs.

I'd say that SW heavy missiles are intended for use against capital ships when they've lost part of their shields and roll over to expose the opposite, still-shielded side. Fighters can loop around and bomb the unshielded area of the ship, hoping to inflict significant damage.
That's not really due to limited range. The heavier gear is slower so they cover less space in the same time as a CM or so. Space bombs and the like are dropped practically on the target so the defenders can't shoot them down or move away before it hits. I agree on the latter part though.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Thoughts?

Post by Mad »

Phil Skayhan wrote:During the battle of Endor

http://www.skayhan.net/Torp.htm

Does SWICS2 shed any light on these?

It might be interesting to compare the speed of these to the Slave I missile....
What I'd like to see, is an estimate of the X-wing's lasers (which caused a much bigger explosion -- and damaged the hull) in that same scene: Image

The left frame has the white blast, and the right frame shows the fire that resulted (the flame is about the size of the X-wing itself). A black scorch mark/hole around the impact can be made out, as well. The damage was caused by 2 or 3 blasts (I forget which).

Okay, yeah, it's off of this subject... still, it's interesting.
User avatar
Phil Skayhan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 941
Joined: 2002-07-08 10:31pm
Contact:

Re: Thoughts?

Post by Phil Skayhan »

Mad wrote:
Phil Skayhan wrote:During the battle of Endor

http://www.skayhan.net/Torp.htm

Does SWICS2 shed any light on these?

It might be interesting to compare the speed of these to the Slave I missile....
What I'd like to see, is an estimate of the X-wing's lasers (which caused a much bigger explosion -- and damaged the hull) in that same scene: Image

The left frame has the white blast, and the right frame shows the fire that resulted (the flame is about the size of the X-wing itself). A black scorch mark/hole around the impact can be made out, as well. The damage was caused by 2 or 3 blasts (I forget which).

Okay, yeah, it's off of this subject... still, it's interesting.
Yes it is. I never noticed that before.

I've been wondering for a time if this was the Executor. If it is, then this suggests that the bridge deflectors were already beginning to fail. Does anyone know if this is the command ship? Can we identify it based on the globes and bridge variation. I believe Saxton had this as a third tpe of bridge.

Sorry I didn't see your post or a few days.
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Thoughts?

Post by Mad »

Phil Skayhan wrote:I've been wondering for a time if this was the Executor. If it is, then this suggests that the bridge deflectors were already beginning to fail. Does anyone know if this is the command ship? Can we identify it based on the globes and bridge variation. I believe Saxton had this as a third tpe of bridge.
Yes, Saxton discusses this tower under "multi-nodular towers" on the Bridge Towers page. He doesn't believe it's the Executor's tower for several reasons (the tower neck, the large nodule is broader than Executor's, and the smaller nodules don't exist on Executor).

It'd be really nice if it was the Executor, but, alas, it isn't. A few possibilities he mentions are: third ISD subclass (ISD-III?), the communications ship from the RotJ novelization, or perhaps the Accusor. Or something completely different.

In any case, the damage to the tower is what's interresting.. it looks to be quite a bit bigger than 60 gigajoules. :mrgreen:
Post Reply