My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by MKSheppard »

Based off stats I found here:

http://www.warships1.com/W-INRO/INRO_Battlefleet.htm

I used the 1939 Royal Navy Fleet Stats as a baseline, subtracting the
Submarines as we have no analog in the SW Universe.

Britain 1939

Battleships 15 5%
Heavy Cruisers 15 5%
Light Cruisers 43 16%
Destroyers 179 68%
8 Carriers 3%

260 Total Capital Ships in the Royal Navy

*****************************************

Using these percentage points and the 25,000 ISD figure given
in SOTP:

25,000 ISDs
25,000 Heavy Cruisers
80,000 Light Cruisers
340,000 Destroyers
15,000 Carriers

500,000 total combat starships in the Imperial Navy
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by MKSheppard »

Yosemite Bear just pointed out in AIM that:

[quote=Yosemite]
Rule Biritania, oh wait they both use 8 pointed symbol too

That would be kinda scary an Imperial Octagon, in the center of a Union Jack...
[/quote]

And considering that the British Empire and Galactic Empire have a LOT
of similarities....
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

What about the officila figures that put the figure at 10-22 million ships?
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Sardaukar
Padawan Learner
Posts: 299
Joined: 2002-07-15 01:45am
Location: In ur base killin ur d00ds
Contact:

Post by Sardaukar »

perhaps those figs count Starfighters, Gunships and Corvettes?
Image
aa#2067
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Sardaukar wrote:perhaps those figs count Starfighters, Gunships and Corvettes?
No, it was in reference to ships, there was something else about fighters later on too.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Post by MKSheppard »

His Divine Shadow wrote:What about the officila figures that put the figure at 10-22 million ships?
Where are those official figures? I'd like to read them for inclusion to
my fanfic vault.
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by Crayz9000 »

MKSheppard wrote:Using these percentage points and the 25,000 ISD figure given
in SOTP:

25,000 ISDs
25,000 Heavy Cruisers
80,000 Light Cruisers
340,000 Destroyers
15,000 Carriers

500,000 total combat starships in the Imperial Navy
So, going off this... it means that only *half* of the Imperial member worlds will have any kind of decent capital ship in orbit at any one time... and *none* of the colonies will have any decent capital ships.

I think I'd agree with Marina that the 25,000 ISDs mentioned are part of the Imperial Navy's strike force, and not committed to policing duties.
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by MKSheppard »

Crayz9000 wrote: So, going off this... it means that only *half* of the Imperial member worlds will have any kind of decent capital ship in orbit at any one time... and *none* of the colonies will have any decent capital ships.
Ah Ah, These are for Major combatants, not corvettes and escorts.
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by Crayz9000 »

MKSheppard wrote:Ah Ah, These are for Major combatants, not corvettes and escorts.
I did say decent capships. Though, assuming over a million corvettes and frigates... could a Nebulon-B by itself really stand up to a focused Rebel assault?
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
meNNis
Padawan Learner
Posts: 269
Joined: 2002-10-31 11:34am
Location: Pismo Beach, Cali
Contact:

Post by meNNis »

of course. puny rebel scum. like they could ever come close to anything more then a mere splinter in the Empire's side. 8)
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by Alyeska »

Crayz9000 wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:Using these percentage points and the 25,000 ISD figure given
in SOTP:

25,000 ISDs
25,000 Heavy Cruisers
80,000 Light Cruisers
340,000 Destroyers
15,000 Carriers

500,000 total combat starships in the Imperial Navy
So, going off this... it means that only *half* of the Imperial member worlds will have any kind of decent capital ship in orbit at any one time... and *none* of the colonies will have any decent capital ships.

I think I'd agree with Marina that the 25,000 ISDs mentioned are part of the Imperial Navy's strike force, and not committed to policing duties.
Its quite clear when Paleon is talking about the ISDs that he is talking about total construction. When you look at the resource references about the make up of the Imperial Navy you realize its 24 ISDs to a sector, but several thousand other ships from VSDs down to Corvettes that make up the bulk of the patrol and police craft as well as anti insurgent uses.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

MKSheppard wrote:Where are those official figures? I'd like to read them for inclusion to my fanfic vault.
It's in the thread Imperial & New Republic Fleet calcs, or a very similar name, it's in this forum, a few pages back I think.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Soulman
Padawan Learner
Posts: 331
Joined: 2002-07-04 02:27pm

Post by Soulman »

You don't need a cap ship for every colony. The speed of hyperdrive is such that a warship could get to the system quickly even with 1 ship for every 10 colonies. Furthermore if you look back to the British Empire many smaller colonies had almost no military presence and certainly no warhips.
User avatar
Rightous Fist Of Heaven
Jedi Master
Posts: 1201
Joined: 2002-09-29 05:31pm
Location: Finland

Post by Rightous Fist Of Heaven »

Well there is allways this

Imperial Sourcebook:
A Sector Group can be expected to contain at least 2,400 ships, 24 of which are Star Destroyers, and another 1,600 combat starships. Thousands of Sector Groups are at the Emperor’s command as he seeks to bring the galaxy firmly under his control.

1600 Combat starships, none of the battlegroup etc. numbers seem to count starfighters at all so its reasonable to believe that this means everything above frigates.
"The ones they built at the height of nuclear weapons could knock the earth out of its orbit" - Physics expert Envy in reference to the hydrogen bombs built during the cold war.
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22463
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

You don't need a cap ship for every colony. The speed of hyperdrive is such that a warship could get to the system quickly even with 1 ship for every 10 colonies. Furthermore if you look back to the British Empire many smaller colonies had almost no military presence and certainly no warhips.
EXCEPT Soulman, in Britian's Days could a Galloen Roll into Port, Bombard the Enitre Settlement into the ground in 1 hours time then cruise on off agian?

No?

Well in SW Victory Class and Above posseive enough weapons to preform a "Base Delta Zero" operation, 100% Causalite rates and 1 hours time...

THATS why you need so many ships, also why Plantary and Theater shields are so prevlant

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Alyeska wrote:
Crayz9000 wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:Using these percentage points and the 25,000 ISD figure given
in SOTP:

25,000 ISDs
25,000 Heavy Cruisers
80,000 Light Cruisers
340,000 Destroyers
15,000 Carriers

500,000 total combat starships in the Imperial Navy
So, going off this... it means that only *half* of the Imperial member worlds will have any kind of decent capital ship in orbit at any one time... and *none* of the colonies will have any decent capital ships.

I think I'd agree with Marina that the 25,000 ISDs mentioned are part of the Imperial Navy's strike force, and not committed to policing duties.
Its quite clear when Paleon is talking about the ISDs that he is talking about total construction. When you look at the resource references about the make up of the Imperial Navy you realize its 24 ISDs to a sector, but several thousand other ships from VSDs down to Corvettes that make up the bulk of the patrol and police craft as well as anti insurgent uses.
No, it isn't. He only refers to "Star Destroyers" - which could include both the larger AND smaller variants, or he could be referring to ISD's alone, or whatnot.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by Alyeska »

Connor MacLeod wrote:
Alyeska wrote:
Crayz9000 wrote: So, going off this... it means that only *half* of the Imperial member worlds will have any kind of decent capital ship in orbit at any one time... and *none* of the colonies will have any decent capital ships.

I think I'd agree with Marina that the 25,000 ISDs mentioned are part of the Imperial Navy's strike force, and not committed to policing duties.
Its quite clear when Paleon is talking about the ISDs that he is talking about total construction. When you look at the resource references about the make up of the Imperial Navy you realize its 24 ISDs to a sector, but several thousand other ships from VSDs down to Corvettes that make up the bulk of the patrol and police craft as well as anti insurgent uses.
No, it isn't. He only refers to "Star Destroyers" - which could include both the larger AND smaller variants, or he could be referring to ISD's alone, or whatnot.
Well, I have pointed out the issue of the Star Destroyer bit before, especially with how some authors have referred to both the VSD and ISD the same way. But more then one person said "NO!!! He MUST be talking about ISDs!". Still, it seems clear that Paleon is remembering the good old days back when the Imperial navy was really freaking huge and had 25K of SDs.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

I'm not sure that this is the best way to approach figuring out the Imperial fleet's composition. Note that almost all SW capital ships have the capability to carry SOME fighters, but that most of the actual fighting is done by the capital ships themselves, with fighters being a small and relatively unimportant secondary function of such ships. That would definitely affect fleet composition.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Re: My Calcs of the Imperial Navy Size

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Alyeska wrote:Well, I have pointed out the issue of the Star Destroyer bit before, especially with how some authors have referred to both the VSD and ISD the same way. But more then one person said "NO!!! He MUST be talking about ISDs!". Still, it seems clear that Paleon is remembering the good old days back when the Imperial navy was really freaking huge and had 25K of SDs.
Well sure it can mean that, but I think it's more likely it just meant ISD's though, people generally refer to the Imperial Star Destroyer when using that kind of wording and not the other kinds.
Ofcourse it's nothing solid and Macleod is right about that, unless there's a more definite quote somewhere else.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Post by SirNitram »

VSD's are an unlikely candidate, myself, given the numbers of them we see thrown around(In one book, I think, a hundred VSD's charge an ISD. What's fucked up is I think the ISD won that one, or came close. A Stackpole job), and that they were made by the Republic, not Empire. The true heavies(SSD, ESSD, Corellian Battleship, etc) are possibly in there, as the WEG sector group info grouped with number of sectors leaves us with 1000 left over. But the way it's phrased definately gives the impression it's the Chimaera's own class he's talking of(And I will HADOKEN anyone who tries to say the ISD-III class specifically had 25,000).
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
Peregrin Toker
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8609
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Peregrin Toker »

What about the anomalously big battleships such as Giel's flagship, the Executor and the Eclipse??

Are they one-of-a-kind vessels???

(There were several Executor-class battleships produced and two Eclipses made, although I'm not too sure about the others such as Giel's, Tagge's and Wermis' battleships which may have been custom-built by the admirals in question)
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"

"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

SirNitram wrote:VSD's are an unlikely candidate, myself, given the numbers of them we see thrown around(In one book, I think, a hundred VSD's charge an ISD. What's fucked up is I think the ISD won that one, or came close. A Stackpole job), and that they were made by the Republic, not Empire. The true heavies(SSD, ESSD, Corellian Battleship, etc) are possibly in there, as the WEG sector group info grouped with number of sectors leaves us with 1000 left over. But the way it's phrased definately gives the impression it's the Chimaera's own class he's talking of(And I will HADOKEN anyone who tries to say the ISD-III class specifically had 25,000).
Actually Stackpole had a single VSD-I with its 80 missile tubes take down the shields of an ISD-II in one or two missile volleys. I have never heard of 100 VSDs going after an ISD and loosing.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Post Reply