PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.
Moderator: Vympel
-
jegs2
- Imperial Spook
- Posts: 4782
- Joined: 2002-08-22 06:23pm
- Location: Alabama
Post
by jegs2 »
Do the shields have to be down in order for holonet to be used on an Imperial ship?
John 3:16-18
Warwolves G2
The
University of North Alabama Lions!
-
Grand Admiral Thrawn
- Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
- Posts: 5755
- Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
- Location: Canada
Post
by Grand Admiral Thrawn »
Yes.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
-
Cpt_Frank
- Official SD.Net Evil Warsie Asshole
- Posts: 3652
- Joined: 2002-07-03 03:05am
- Location: the black void
-
Contact:
Post
by Cpt_Frank »
Only the ray shields the particle ones not IIRC.
Supermod
-
Ender
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 11323
- Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
- Location: Illinois
Post
by Ender »
Cpt_Frank wrote:Only the ray shields the particle ones not IIRC.
It never specified, it only said they had to be down.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
-
Kuja
- The Dark Messenger
- Posts: 19322
- Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
- Location: AZ
Post
by Kuja »
Ender wrote:Cpt_Frank wrote:Only the ray shields the particle ones not IIRC.
It never specified, it only said they had to be down.
It's just logical: why lower particle shields for an energy reception?
JADAFETWA
-
His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
Post
by His Divine Shadow »
IG-88E wrote:Ender wrote:Cpt_Frank wrote:Only the ray shields the particle ones not IIRC.
It never specified, it only said they had to be down.
It's just logical: why lower particle shields for an energy reception?
Well, asteroids interfers with holonet transferring, planetary bodies also block them.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
