That's a meaningless excuse. They use viable missile technology and there is nothing we have seen that means it could not be deployed in a rocket or gun form. Particularly as they had as much carriage as the Empire could ever hope to have in one place.Serafina wrote:You know, that was on a planet - at some point (about 5km, IIRC) the planet will get in the way with LOS-weapons.FOG3 wrote:
Then at Hoth where they waited until they could see the Walkers through magnified optics before they actually opened fire.
Doctrinally they don't seem to favor that long of range.
The ranges are set where they are because they have doctrinally limited themselves to those ranges. Hoth is by far the most open battle we see, besides possibly Geonosis where everything was also rather close ranges.
Novellization is the only thing that would spec that one way or the other, and it says jack. By all rights it should have been the secondaries, not point defense. Leia's ship is not from ST, and thus you can get away with claiming the use of AA guns against cap ships, for crying out loud. Nevermind given as people have so nicely pointed out that there is not a ballistic range restraint, if anything light guns should be more precise. As Mike himself has pointed out the bigger the gun, the more difficult the problem of making it track a moving target.PhilosopherOfSorts wrote:Vader's ISD (Devestator?) was using light weapons, possibly even point-defense weapons, to try to hit a precise target on a ship that Vader wanted disabled, not destroyed. If Devestator was shooting to kill I doubt it would have had to get so close.
The bottomline is they weren't exactly not missing the Blockade Runner entirely even at that range, either. So I find no merit in your objections. The clean shot, verse Fing over your sensors and dealing with a maneuvering target is another matter.