How Many Star Destroyers?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Trytostaydead
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3690
Joined: 2003-01-28 09:34pm

Post by Trytostaydead »

Vympel wrote:There were 25,000 Star Destroyers. That's it. Just 25,000. The official evidence is quite explicit.
So which leads to the question, exactly how strong IS an ISD? I mean, it's so hard to tell. In some instances you get Rogue squadron which can seemingly take out an entire SD's complement of tie fighters. Han Solo can destroy an SD by himself with a little distraction (Courtship of Princess Leia). An A-wing was enough to plummet a SSD into the Death Star (why weren't there fail safe navigational systems?).

Was 25,000 enough to hold down an entire galaxy?
User avatar
Jordie
Padawan Learner
Posts: 234
Joined: 2003-03-09 06:29am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Post by Jordie »

Trytostaydead wrote: In some instances you get Rogue squadron which can seemingly take out an entire SD's complement of tie fighters. Han Solo can destroy an SD by himself with a little distraction (Courtship of Princess Leia).
that can be explain by 2 words, stupid writers.
An A-wing was enough to plummet a SSD into the Death Star (why weren't there fail safe navigational systems?).
The Executor's shields were taken out by bombardment from other capitol ships.
Last edited by Jordie on 2003-03-11 02:08am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Darth Garden Gnome
Official SD.Net Lawn Ornament
Posts: 6029
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:35am
Location: Some where near a mailbox

Post by Darth Garden Gnome »

Jordie wrote:This first 2 can be explain by 2 words, stupid writers. The Executor's shields were taken out by bombardment from other capitol ships.
Indeed Stackpole's wankfest of invincible X-Wings able to kill ISDs with ease should be regarded at the ass-end of all resources when you want to judge the capabilitites of an ISD.

And yes, it wasn't a lone A-Wing that killed the Executor. It was 30 minutes of constant bombardment from Rebel Mon Cal Cruisers.
Leader of the Secret Gnome Revolution
Axis Kast
Vympel's Bitch
Posts: 3893
Joined: 2003-03-02 10:45am
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Contact:

Post by Axis Kast »

Can anybody dig up the evidence that supports there ever being 200 Star Destroyers in the Imperial Remnant c. Vision of the Future? Or even the data in Spectre of the Past acknowledging fleets of up to 25,000 Star Destroyers during Thrawn’s time?

Dalaa’s fleet seems to make more sense. Around one hundred Victory-class Star Destroyers and forty-five Imperial-type vessels at any one gathering point. At least it corresponds with impressions of proper battle-group strength.

I suppose, for all intents and purposes, that the vessels at the collapse of the Galactic Empire were scrapped, decommissioned, destroyed, or left derelict under the following circumstances:

• A substantial number of Star Destroyers (as well as support vessels) would have consigned themselves to service in the name of a large planet able to support them materially. Kuat, Fondor, Corellia, Coruscant, Bastion, Yaga Minor, Bilbringi, Mon Calamari, and Sluis Van all come to mind here.

• Very many Star Destroyers (and an equally large number of support vessels – especially torpedo spheres and dreadnaughts) would have been decomissioned as part of the overall scrapping of Palpatine’s military-industrial complex. This trend likely helps cover, to the best of our reasoning, the loss of so many vessels.

• Thousands of Star Destroyers (though I’d like to say only hundreds) likely fell victim to internal power struggles or blockade (and thus forced over-consumption of resources). Many were probably left derelict after being unable to find safe haven or gain access to large-scale shipyards following major conflicts.

• Thousands of Star Destroyers (again, one would think only hundreds or even dozens) were destroyed by the New Republic during the post-Palpatine engagement of isolated garrison worlds or Imperial fleets whose cohesion was no longer absolute.

• Thousands of Star Destroyers (and this is a huge number) would have been abandoned for scrap unintentionally, again the victim of a crumbling infrastructure. They might have served – unlike the decomissioned vessels – for a short time before being declared unservicable due to lack of maintenance facilities.

• Thousands of Star Destroyers must have joined smaller “sector patrols” under the New Republic’s aegis. As has been suggested, if twenty-four were in a Sector Fleet, the scope of the galaxy and its demands for security would have drawn off nearly ten thousand of these vessels on their own.

The new NJO series seems to portray ISDs in a good light, acknowledging their ability to soak huge quantities of damage and serve as pseudo-carriers where necessary. Two or three are sufficient to turn the tide of a large battle between fleet groups of capital ships.
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Re: How Many Star Destroyers?

Post by phongn »

Captain tycho wrote:
Admiral Johnason wrote:During the height of the Empire, there were arounf 2,500,000 SDs. By the time of the Hand of Thrawn Series, that number had dropped to 25,000.
2 million ISDs? Where the fuck are getting that from? :shock:
And what kind of drugs are you doing?
The top-end estimate I've seen for the Imperial Starfleet (inclusive of an "Imperial Navy" which serves as the offensive arm of the Starfleet) has approximately 2.1 million warships in the 1-1.6km length range.

If you begin extrapolating from the Dodonna Estimate then we get even larger numbers of warships; Marina's postulates about 6-7e9 warships (split between FTL and non-FTL ships); Conner considers that about low-end for the DE.
User avatar
Lord Pounder
Pretty Hate Machine
Posts: 9695
Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
Location: Belfast, unfortunately
Contact:

Re: How Many Star Destroyers?

Post by Lord Pounder »

Admiral Johnason wrote: During the height of the Empire, there were arounf 2,500,000 SDs. By the time of the Hand of Thrawn Series, that number had dropped to 25,000.
Have you actually read any of the fucking books?
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

Crayz9000 wrote:Vision of the Future put the amount of ISDs held by the Remnant at 200, and the previous amount (at the Empire's height) at 25,000.

Neither figure makes much sense.
Why? Obviously the Empire had to spend a great deal of effort to keep th system's in line. 25,000 ISDs (and just ISDs) seems reasonable enough. There are other larger and other smaller ships that round out the fleet.

And what's wrong with 200 ISDs? Given a fleet size of 25,000 and two decades of civil war that number makes a fair amount of sense given the number of worlds the Remamnent holds.
Image
User avatar
Trytostaydead
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3690
Joined: 2003-01-28 09:34pm

Post by Trytostaydead »

Stormbringer wrote: Why? Obviously the Empire had to spend a great deal of effort to keep th system's in line. 25,000 ISDs (and just ISDs) seems reasonable enough. There are other larger and other smaller ships that round out the fleet.

And what's wrong with 200 ISDs? Given a fleet size of 25,000 and two decades of civil war that number makes a fair amount of sense given the number of worlds the Remamnent holds.
200 ISDs should reasonably be enough to hold down eight sectors, especially when a majority are loyal to the Empire. At 1,000 systems, you'll have maybe 5 systems to be patrolled by a single SD not including various other warships and lesser escorts. Not too bad, considering an SD can fully pacify an entire system by its lonesome.

Another question is, how quickly are SDs built? The Remnant was down to one major shipyard devoted to cap-ship production. How long does it take to pump out an SD?
User avatar
Crayz9000
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 7329
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:39pm
Location: Improbably superpositioned
Contact:

Post by Crayz9000 »

Axis Kast wrote:Can anybody dig up the evidence that supports there ever being 200 Star Destroyers in the Imperial Remnant c. Vision of the Future? Or even the data in Spectre of the Past acknowledging fleets of up to 25,000 Star Destroyers during Thrawn’s time?
I was going to give the quote earlier, but I couldn't find it.

Spectre of the Past, pages 5-6
Timothy Zahn wrote:"We still hold eight sectors -- over a thousand inhabited systems. We have the Fleet, nearly two hundred Star Destroyers strong. We're still very much a force to be reckoned with."
Timothy Zahn wrote:A thousand systems left, out of an Empire that had once spanned a million. Two hundred Star Destroyers remaining from a fleet that had once included over twenty-five thousand of them.
Mind you, I am somewhat biased; I honestly prefer Marina's fleet size estimates to the official ones, given the amount of research she put into it. For a million member worlds and *50 million* colonies and protectorates, 25,000 ISDs is completely insignificant...
A Tribute to Stupidity: The Robert Scott Anderson Archive (currently offline)
John Hansen - Slightly Insane Bounty Hunter - ASVS Vets' Assoc. Class of 2000
HAB Cryptanalyst | WG - Intergalactic Alliance and Spoof Author | BotM | Cybertron | SCEF
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Stormbringer wrote:
Crayz9000 wrote:Vision of the Future put the amount of ISDs held by the Remnant at 200, and the previous amount (at the Empire's height) at 25,000.

Neither figure makes much sense.
Why? Obviously the Empire had to spend a great deal of effort to keep th system's in line. 25,000 ISDs (and just ISDs) seems reasonable enough. There are other larger and other smaller ships that round out the fleet.

And what's wrong with 200 ISDs? Given a fleet size of 25,000 and two decades of civil war that number makes a fair amount of sense given the number of worlds the Remamnent holds.
I think he means (and I agree with him) that the figures are too low.

I prefer Marina's.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
phongn
Rebel Leader
Posts: 18487
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:11pm

Post by phongn »

Marina's estimate is even considered a bit low-ball, it could be several orders of magnitude higher.

I wonder how large the NR's war machine is, including all those independant planatary/system defense forces.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Has anyone considered just what sort of fleet the Empire MUST have given the Dodonna calcs? Just for each vessel to have an average firepower of 1e25-1e26 watts requires something on the order of trillions to tens of trillions of warships. And that figure increases quite substantially when you modify for smaller classes.
Post Reply