No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
tezunegari
Jedi Knight
Posts: 693
Joined: 2008-11-13 12:44pm

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by tezunegari »

Havok wrote:IIRC in the novel he does indeed have two lightsabers in his ofice. I think one was imbedded in a statue.
Were there really two? I always thought Palpy encased the lightsaber he used in a statue made of really dense material to fool weapon scans and smuggle it into the office. And some time before Mace tried to take him out he retrieved it by remotely activating it with the force.

Might have to read the novel again...
"Bring your thousands, I have my axe."
"Bring your cannons, I have my armor."
"Bring your mighty... I am my own champion."
Cue Unit-01 ramming half the Lance of Longinus down Adam's head and a bemused Gendo, "Wrong end, son."
Ikari Gendo, NGE Fanfiction "Standing Tall"
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by Havok »

Yeah that sounds right, but I'm pretty sure there was a back up or something and one got destroyed in the fight. I'll check. I think I have the book available.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by Stark »

In the Hav version Mace and Anakin constantly destroy each other's weapon and constantly recover new ones from slaughtered Jedi children.

Way better.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by Havok »

I'd say so.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Dominarch's Hope
Village Idiot
Posts: 395
Joined: 2013-01-25 01:02am

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by Dominarch's Hope »

Knife wrote:*sigh*

Anakin is the key to the whole thing true, but not in the negative sense you're saying.

First off, Anakin isn't the start of the problem. Arguably the Republic is, and arguably Jedi like Mace Windu are. I believe it was the RotS novel explaining that Mace Windu broke the Jedi code about no attachments. He loved the Republic, was a fanatic about it. It shows in that he was willing to do a coup for it, and even earlier do heavy surveillance on the Senate for it, all arguably outside the scope of the Jedi. Yoda also said it himself, the Jedi were too arrogant and sure of themselves.

You can also place the blame on who ever made the prophecy, or more importantly the entity that made the prophecy happen. The Force.

Without Anakin, the transition to the Galactic Empire isn't as clean, but it does happen. Anakin informs the Jedi who Sidious is that lead 4 of it's Masters to death quickly. Without Anakin that doesn't happen, but the 'plan' still goes forward. Order 66 may or may not take out Windu, hard to tell. Without Anakin there is no assault on the Temple by him, but the clone would still go. Do some Jedi get away? To do what? The Republic still falls and the Jedi are still crushed.

You know what doesn't happen without Anakin, the Emperor isn't killed. With no Anakin, there is no safety valve some 20 years later to make the 'correct decision' and off Palpatine. With no death of Palpatine, no Imperial fleet in disarray. No Rebel victory, no destruction of the Deathstars, the Empire remains.

Basically you get rid of Anakin, you ensure Palpatine's victory and make sure he stays for a long time.
Isnt part of the problem is that the Jedi didnt take the Sith's version of the prophecy into account? If they had, they would have known damn well what would have happened.

Assuming that Phantom Menace playes out basically normally...

Without Anakin, it is very likely that Count Dooku ends up killing or converting Obi-Wan Kenobi, a very dangerous prospect. Of course I'm presupposing that Obi and whoever his new apprentice is manages to get that far. It means that Padme and whoever stays on Naboo with her keeps there. Would Yoda and the Jedi come to rescue Obi-Wan? If not, the CIS can get the jump on the Republic. Not that it matters of course....

Hmm...Darkside Obi-Wan. Possible but unlikely. Although if he does fall, that means that if he turns back, Sidious could be fucked. I dont think Sidious could take on Yoda and Mace at the same time.
The Disintegrator
Redshirt
Posts: 29
Joined: 2013-02-13 06:04pm
Location: Naperville, IL

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by The Disintegrator »

I would say that Anakin was required for the Galactic Empire to come about for the plan that Palpatine used. However, we have to keep in mind that Palpatine is manipulative and adaptive. Given that he became Chancellor without Anakin I'd say that the only significant obstacle was the Jedi. While Anakin certainly made them easier to get rid of, I would hazard to guess that Palpatine could have come up with other means of getting rid of them. And considering that Order 66 took care of most of them, it'd really be a matter of Palpatine would just need a new way of dealing with a few of the Jedi Masters.
User avatar
Arawn Fenn
Youngling
Posts: 116
Joined: 2012-08-16 10:03pm
Location: Dol Guldur

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by Arawn Fenn »

The Disintegrator wrote:I would say that Anakin was required for the Galactic Empire to come about for the plan that Palpatine used.
He wasn't. The bulk of the plan was concocted before Palpatine even knew of Anakin's existence.
Dominarch's Hope wrote:Isnt part of the problem is that the Jedi didnt take the Sith's version of the prophecy into account?
Different prophecy.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by Batman »

Reread. He said Anakin was needed for the plan Palpatine used, not that Anakin was needed for the Empire to happen period. Since Anakin was undeniably available and Palpy equally undeniably slotted Any into his plans, yeah, the plan Palpatine actually used kinda depended on Any being available.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Arawn Fenn
Youngling
Posts: 116
Joined: 2012-08-16 10:03pm
Location: Dol Guldur

Re: No Anakin Skywalker=No Galactic Empire?

Post by Arawn Fenn »

Batman wrote:Palpy equally undeniably slotted Any into his plans, yeah, the plan Palpatine actually used kinda depended on Any being available.
I don't think that post means what you think it means. The plan Anakin was "slotted into" is what I'm talking about, and for it to be sitting there preceding Anakin being "slotted into" it, it existed in a form not dependent on Anakin. Order 66 did not depend on Anakin, and the idea behind it was invented before the Sith even knew of Anakin. "And considering that Order 66 took care of most of them, it'd really be a matter of Palpatine would just need a new way of dealing with a few of the Jedi Masters."
Post Reply