The second and third Home One
Moderator: Vympel
The second and third Home One
Okay, I think I may have some hard evidence for a second Home One. In this animated GIF (HDS's), on the far left we can see a Calimarian cruiser approaching, probably getting ready to plaster the Executor with everything it has.
A single bump is visible on the starboard side towards the front. Home One-type cruisers have that bump, but the MC80A-type cruisers do not appear to. Liberty-class cruisers have some small bumps, but none that should be prominent at this range (1, 2).
As for the third one, this shot shows a cruiser about to be destroyed by the DS2. The forward area shows a prominent "triple bump" and in the rear you can see a raised area with that appears to be a small bridge-pod on top. I would argue that this design matches Home One; the Wingless design (MC80/MC80A) is missing some of those features: the "third level" blister is not as pronounced and lacks the high bridge in the aft portion of the ship.
(Images from HDS and SWTC).
A single bump is visible on the starboard side towards the front. Home One-type cruisers have that bump, but the MC80A-type cruisers do not appear to. Liberty-class cruisers have some small bumps, but none that should be prominent at this range (1, 2).
As for the third one, this shot shows a cruiser about to be destroyed by the DS2. The forward area shows a prominent "triple bump" and in the rear you can see a raised area with that appears to be a small bridge-pod on top. I would argue that this design matches Home One; the Wingless design (MC80/MC80A) is missing some of those features: the "third level" blister is not as pronounced and lacks the high bridge in the aft portion of the ship.
(Images from HDS and SWTC).
Waitamoment, which crusier is destroyed immediately after the final shot?
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
That is definately 100% certainly a Home One. It lacks the distinctive side blisters of the MC-80.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- CmdrWilkens
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
- Location: Land of the Crabcake
- Contact:
Also that shot is from the opening sequence of the battle. The cruiser destroyed by the DS2's 2nd shot is in the lower right hand corner of the screen and there aren't nearly that many TIEs in the scene.
What we do see in that shot is 2 Liberty-class Cruisers and Home One. Now the animated .gif is debateable but hardly proof of there being a second Home One.
What we do see in that shot is 2 Liberty-class Cruisers and Home One. Now the animated .gif is debateable but hardly proof of there being a second Home One.
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
Yes, but this is from a much larger expanded frame of that scene. IMO, 1, 2 and 3 belong to the exact same scene (just cropped much smaller) and show the second DS shot.CmdrWilkens wrote:Also that shot is from the opening sequence of the battle. The cruiser destroyed by the DS2's 2nd shot is in the lower right hand corner of the screen and there aren't nearly that many TIEs in the scene.
The forward starboard side blister is visually distinct, however, and based on its current trajectory would match the cruiser seen on the right of this image which has the distinct H1 engine profile. An earlier scene from Ackbar's flag bridge showed the demise of the Executor from a differing angle than that cruiser would indicate.Now the animated .gif is debateable but hardly proof of there being a second Home One.
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
Phongn: There are no MC80As. They're a post-Endor model. There's the wingless-subtype MC80 and Liberty-subtype MC80. And then the Home One-type commandships.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Upon reviewing, it is clear that the second cruiser destroyed by the DS2 was in fact of the Home One subtype.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- Peregrin Toker
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8609
- Joined: 2002-07-04 10:57am
- Location: Denmark
- Contact:
Where??? I can't see any starships at all in that shot's lower right-hand corner.CmdrWilkens wrote:Also that shot is from the opening sequence of the battle. The cruiser destroyed by the DS2's 2nd shot is in the lower right hand corner of the screen and there aren't nearly that many TIEs in the scene.
"Hi there, would you like to have a cookie?"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"
"No, actually I would HATE to have a cookie, you vapid waste of inedible flesh!"