Blaster bolt velocity argument (again)

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Blaster bolt velocity argument (again)

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Started in this thread. Claim is this time that blaster bolts move as fast as base balls :D

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 39&start=0

I started this thread becuase the discussion on blaster bolts has no real relevance to the original thread, and really belongs here anyhow.

If one of the mods would like to split off the discussion on blasters from that thread, I'd appreciate it too.
User avatar
Smiling Bandit
Jedi Master
Posts: 1274
Joined: 2002-07-05 01:58pm

Post by Smiling Bandit »

Some of them do. In atmosphere, from hand-held weapons, move at the indicated speeds.

Sometimes, they appear to blow up at the target before the visible sectiona arrives. Othertimes, they do not. Either starship weapons use a different mechanism.

But for my money, suspension of disbelief doesn't go that far.
ph3@r the k3oot3 0n3z
I thought this was a capture the b33r mod?!
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

If this has anything to do with Jedi blocking, then it's irrelevant because Jedi's don't start the blocking motion *after* the shot has been fired, so for all intents and purposes the Jedis could block a projectile even if it's instantaneous.

Other than that, dunno what to say. Somebody once pointed out already that blasters pretty much take the same time to cross a mile than to cross a meter, so it could simply be a retinal effect of somekind and the blast moves at lightspeed... whether it impacts before the visual FX could be attributed to the bolt not *reacting* immediately with the target, or something.
:|
Image
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Slartibartfast wrote:If this has anything to do with Jedi blocking, then it's irrelevant because Jedi's don't start the blocking motion *after* the shot has been fired, so for all intents and purposes the Jedis could block a projectile even if it's instantaneous.
No, Jedi cannot move there sabers at unlimited speeds which is why they can be killed by a large volume of fire. Even starting before the shot is fired, you still need a given margin of time to move the saber and if it arrives before then they die.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

Sea Skimmer wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:If this has anything to do with Jedi blocking, then it's irrelevant because Jedi's don't start the blocking motion *after* the shot has been fired, so for all intents and purposes the Jedis could block a projectile even if it's instantaneous.
No, Jedi cannot move there sabers at unlimited speeds which is why they can be killed by a large volume of fire. Even starting before the shot is fired, you still need a given margin of time to move the saber and if it arrives before then they die.
This is about the speed of the projectile, not the amount of projectiles. Of course they can't block an amount of projectiles that exceeds their speed at blocking projectiles. You don't need any margin for a single shot, because you know where it's going to land before they shot it at you. By the time they pull the trigger your saber is already there. And with the eye-to-brain-to-hand lag, they just won't be able to do anything about it.

Nothing about massed fire in my post. See?
Image
Post Reply