Yes, for time sensitive decisions in the faces of a crisis. However, for the truly important decisions such as: civil liberties, equal representation, etc. the answer is no. No single person can be expected to make the right decisions for everyone.The Spartan "Democracies" Elected Kings for a life term. quote]
I think you misunderstand my point. Yes, there are democratic monarchies, England being perhaps the best example. However, seldom are the monarchs elected, monarchs as a rule are born into there position not elected. In my opinion if the head of state is "elect" by a small ruling group, or can only be selected from a few privelige families its not a democracy. The key point is who holds the real power in the government if it is not the people then its not a democracy.
As some deceisions had to be left in the hands of one man, and one man alone.
A government such as Naboo, where the "Monarch" is elected is not a monarchy its a Repuplic! In the case of Naboo, the Queen is the same as the american President. She's an elected official who rules by will of the people. Also we know that the Naboo have a legislative body of some sort by the quotes I gave in an earlier post. Regardless of Naboo's choice in naming their head of states title, Naboo is a Republic.
The point of this thread was really about, is that having a 16 year old as the elected leader of any entire planet is a truly stupid idea; and the fact that it would be considerably more palpatable if she had inherited the position.
Hey, I'm not trying to sound preachy, or anything its just my opinion.
PS. What do you all think about this Naboo as a Republic idea?