FTeik wrote:I know, what i meant and you know what i meant. You just don´t like it.
This coming from one of the crowd that still wants to say Palpatine in DE wasn't the real one, and Pelleaon in Darksabre wasn't the same guy. Desertion is a high crime and an abandonment of post in one's military. Its serious and wrong. Palpatine did not commit such an act.
FTeik wrote:Since he didn´t gave his empire a working chain of sucession, yes, he is partly to blame. This is clearyl established in the DESB.
And Isard could have met with the member worlds and redrafted the Imperial Charter to create succession. Likewise with Thrawn. All of the Imperial leaders are guilty of this. And the original, true ideals of the Empire of the movies are those of the Empire. Any ideals of an Empire which evolved later IS NOT THE EMPIRE.
FTeik wrote:And i want to point at his first meeting with Luke Skywalker on Byss: "I gave them (the NR) years to claim the galaxy for themself, but without the Jedi they failed." So he could have done something, but didn´t.

How does this change the fact that he waited til he recuperated, and his servants were not dependable? How does this change that fact than none of the usurpers did anything to create succession or legality or stability? Palpatine is responsible for the Empire's collapse, but it exists as an extension of his will, and always did. There was never supposed to be a successor.
FTeik wrote:And given the fact, that we only saw small bits of an imperial military, that should have been much larger in the years between ROTJ and DE or that Zsinj managed to conquer one third of the galaxy without meeting much resistance it is safe to assume, that already then entire fleets were called to the deep core.
Care to prove "without much resistance"? That doesn't prove there were no defenses. That just as easily could've meant that the local systems and defenses surrendered.
The Deep Core contains few habitable worlds and little resources. I sincerely doubt the majority of the Imperial Navy was recalled to the Deep Core, which did not have the resources or infrastructure to support such a large force. A significant percentage of naval might, sure, but not most of the Navy/Starfleet.
And how is Palpatine at fault for recalling large amounts of naval resources a bad thing? Commanders wholesale were running off with territory and armadas and the High Command and whatever usurpers were in power at the time were incompetant. The Vizier in power betrayed the Empire for a couple planets to rule. He was totally correct in assuming there was only one man who could rule the Empire: him. And since he did much better than anyone else with Operation SHADOWHAND, I'm inclined to definitely agree with him.
They weren't to be trusted with control of the Empire--none could fight off the Rebels or competantly hold the Empire together, and he couldn't return because he was weak and vulnerable. So I don't see what other viable alternative someone in his position had.
FTeik wrote:And its up to you to prove, that he needed four or five years to recover. May i remind you, that the emperors spirit travelled from Dar Soocha (Hutt Space in the outer rim, just like Endor) to Byss after his death without the need for a host or so much time to recover (since he revealed himself shortly after)
1.) Hutt Space is not in the Outer Rim. Endor is significantly further out.
2.) Palpatine was much stronger by
Dark Empire than he had been in
Return of the Jedi. His power had benefited by years of recuperation and thus time to study and perfect.
3.) Palpatine's spirit also spent over a year inside Jeng Droga, which presumably weakened him considerably.
4.)
[i]The Essential Chronology[/i] by Kevin J. Anderson and Daniel Wallace, p. 89 wrote:
THE RETURN OF ISARD
9-10 A.B.Y.
....On Byss in the Deep Core, Emperor Palpatine's spirit finally recuperated from its difficult transition into a new clone body.
Perhaps he was capable of issuing orders for awhile before (and the fleets could've been, and in some cases likely were recalled by his servants, not himself, esp. since some recalls were while his spirit was inside Jeng Droga). But it would've been stupid given the undependability of his servants and the threat of the New Republic and Thrawn (before Palpatine had him eliminated) to reveal himself, and it was highly prudent to wait until he was recuperated from his difficult transition.
FTeik wrote:See above. He must have recalled ships long before TTT, otherwise their commanders would have turned warlord or been under the command or Thrawn, when he made his offensive.
Agreed. That doesn't mean he was ready to assume the responsibilities as Galactic Emperor yet.
FTeik wrote:And what prevents this from the forces at the Hand of Thrawn being a joint-venture that far away from the centres of imperial power? Especially, if the empire did so before (Tales of the Mos Eisley-Cantina, The story of the Davorian).
It is up to you to prove that! I've already shown its a foriegn military that shelters defectors to the Rebellion and is full of deserted Imperial officers. I'm sure Thrawn saw it that way, but his opinion is irrelvent, since his ideals are not Palpatine's, and not the Empire's. His goal was his own personal power and protecting the Chiss. The evidence weighs against you, especially since the MHP's master was eliminated by his Emperor.
FTeik wrote:At least eight years after the final death of Palpatine. Not to forget, that they sent support in the NJO, when called by the IR.
Fel defected a year or so after Endor and was soon in the MHP. His inferior rank to Parck suggests seniority by the latter to me. Parck had likely abandoned his Imperial post even earlier than Fel's defection.
The Chiss themselves say they are committed to the ideals and support expeditions against the YV. Prove they were summoned by the IR. Prove that means diddly shit, since the IR is definitely NOT the Empire.
FTeik wrote:Didn´t you read, what i wrote? I already conceeded, that he is the same guy.
It seemed to me you were saying "if I saw conclusive proof" and saying you hadn't seen any for Palpatine's continuity of existance. Nevermind then.
FTeik wrote:Of course the empire stayed united the entire five years from ROTJ and TTT and men like Harrsk, Teradoc, Zsinj, Droemmel, Ardus Kain, Grand Admiral Grunger, Grand Admiral Pitta and so on only pretended to set themself apart from the empire
Red herrings. My post was directed to DGG who used the EC quote to say that Palpatine "wanted the Empire to crumble." That's not true and that's not what it says. It says he wanted the NRDF out of position to defend the Core and out advancing on the Rim.
FTeik wrote:*snip*
Yes, I know the post-Endor desintegration was due to illegitimacy, warlordism, and incompetance. My refutation was narrow and specific to DGG's argument. See above.
FTeik wrote:That is not even eight, but almost TWENTY years after Palpatines final death and being cut of from the official imperial supply-line. Not to mention, that Jagged Fel could never have been an proper imperial officer under Palpatine because of his young age. Life goes on, even after an emperors death. You have no proof, that things shifted away from the empires benefit before Palpatines final death (especially if he himself tasked or was convinced by Thrawn to fortify the Unknown Regions).
Thrawn's mapping campiagn was during the movie-era, before Palpatine's death at Endor. Evidence exists that Palpatine was feeding Thrawn's mapping forces materiel, money, and manpower. I do not refute this.
We see the
Admonitor, and support forces with Thrawn, but these are Imperial Navy forces. They're not staffed with Chiss.
My point is, that with the years going on, and the lack of an
Admonitor in the NJO and VoTF, that the Imperial mapping forces were recalled in one of the many campiagns over the decade and a half. Perhaps by Palpatine's agents, to the Deep Core. Perhaps by Isard, along with the
Black Sword Command recalls. Perhaps by Thrawn himself, to supplement his critical shortcoming of ships for the upcoming campiagns. Perhaps by Palpatine during Operation SHADOWHAND (
all of the Empire was said to be reunited).
All that we see left is a Chiss phalanx staffed by whatever Imperial officers Thrawn apparently convinced to defect. Joint-efforts, training efforts--these are done, but one is still a member of their original military organization.
The NEGTC refers to the establishment of the Hand of Thrawn seperately from the
Admonitor and her mapping campiagns (and that is all, mapping--only the Chiss are referred to as fighting off enemies).
I believe the MHP is just that, a Chiss phalanx. The fact that one of its generals is a defector to the Rebellion from the Imperial Fighter Corps, suggests to me that it is not an Imperial recognized or approved endeavour. I think the lack of the mapping forces point that they were recalled. Only the defectors remained with the Chiss military.
FTeik wrote:Why? We don´t see the uniforms they wear while the emperor is still alive.
So defecting from the Imperial Remnant is so much better than defecting from the Empire? If the Empire loves this foriegn military and its a "joint effort", why were traitors among her ranks?
FTeik wrote:And if their operations were in concert with imperial interests or Thrawn´s chiss served as vasall-troops, why shouldn´t they have gotten permission to keep their uniforms?
I'm not going to knock down these assumptions. Look, I've already proved it is an organization which is staffed by traitors to the Empire while the Emperor is still alive. I've pointed out that the fighting against enemies is described as a Chiss problem, and that all the
Admonitor (curiously no fleets are mentioned, just this ISD, and presumably that means her support forces as well) was just mapping, and is later absent. Since Thrawn badly needed ships, and since there were multiple Imperial recalls between Endor and Palpatine's final death, that any joint effort ended then.
FTeik wrote:But the official ideals of the empire included "order" and "stability". And it is easier for soldiers to follow their commander, then a far-away-emperor from another species.
So who cares if they shared some ideals? They still made Imperials swear allegiance to Thrawn specifically and put them in new uniforms after the mapping forces withdrew, serving alongside traitors to the Empire.
FTeik wrote:Do you suggest the already trained Chiss-soldiers should have started from scratch with training, rising through the ranks and wearing imperial uniforms even if they already served imperial interests as well as those of their own species? Why undergo all that trouble?
You've answered your own question. Don't go through the trouble because the MHP
is part of the Chiss military and answers to
its Syndic (they even address him as such!),
exactly as one would expect from a
Chiss military protocol.
They're not the mapping forces. They're not Imperial.
FTeik wrote:And as shown above, there is proof to the contrary.
Issuing orders does not make it safe or prudent to reveal oneself to the galaxy. I again posted proof he hadn't recuperated until after Thrawn's death. The most logical conclusion is Palpatine didn't reassume the throne because it was dangerous and stupid to do so before, and possibly he wasn't even able.
Concession Accepted.
He evidently didn't feel he could assume the throne until he was done recuperating.
2.) The Emperor in DE is the same as the Emperor in ROTJ by implication and according to multiple sources. If you have good reason to disregard those canon sources (and qualitative opinion bullshit is not "good reason" to disregard canon), post such proof. Otherwise shut up and concede.
FTeik wrote:If the MHP was never part of the empire, its members can´t defect or desert the empire. And you have no proof, that its non-chiss-members didn´t follow the orders of the reborn emperor or if they were called at all.
Its called inductive logic. I find it telling that an Admiral in the MHP outranked someone who joined it a year or two after Endor. This would suggest they joined the MHP before Palpatine's return. The mapping Imperials are gone, leaving only these MHP officers which include a defector to the Rebellion. Its nothing in bold-face print, but it indicates quite clearly to me that they're deserters.
Why does this bother you so much? At least one of the two officers, Parck and Fel, is a
defector to the Rebellion! What's so repulsive about following the evidence and logic to the conclusion that they abandoned the Empire to join a foriegn military? I'm not suggesting everyone involved with Thrawn was a traitor. I think almost certainly all the mapping forces returned to the Empire and fought as Imperials.
FTeik wrote:If they weren´t called, they stayed on their posts without having defected or deserted. And according to you the empire ceased to exist after Palpatines final death or the end of this Carvius-guy from CrimsonEmpire.
Fel's a traitor to the Empire. There's no refuting that fact.
Parck outranks him despite his joining only a couple years after Endor and several years before Operation SHADOWHAND. By extension, he must've joined up earlier (jumping ship from the mapping forces, likely following Palpatine's death at Endor). He stays along, even though the mapping forces and the
Admonitor are no where to be seen.
Therefore, I believe he left the Empire and joined the MHP before Palpatine's return, and that he didn't return with the mapping forces (seperate from the MHP).