Want a really good look at that Rebel HMG?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Post by Stofsk »

Um, it says on that card there it's an "artillery" weapon. Does anyone else think "sus?"
Image
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

It also says "repeating blaster". Whatever it's classification in the card game, bah.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

Stofsk wrote:Um, it says on that card there it's an "artillery" weapon. Does anyone else think "sus?"
It's been a long time since I've played the SW CCG, but I remember that "Artillery Weapon" was only a game mechanic. It has no meaning in the actual reality of SW.
User avatar
Meest
Jedi Master
Posts: 1429
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:04am
Location: Toronto

Post by Meest »

I have the laserdisc rip of ESB on DVD and there is a scene where it fires one big blast, unless there's another fire mode that's a pretty big repeating blast. Can capture a short bit of it if someone has webspace to upload to.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Not so far-fetched. Original Maxim guns (and before them, .50 cal. mechanical Gatlings) were deployed as field artillery, before they were understood how to be used. There is a historical precedent for heavy and medium machine guns as "artillery" emplacements.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Meest
Jedi Master
Posts: 1429
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:04am
Location: Toronto

Post by Meest »

After reviewing it again, it is shown to fire several repeating big blasts, 3-4 pulses/sec. Maybe the rebels expected, or we didn't see any troops approaching and just turned the guns on the vehicles, to me it looks like that thing can mow down lines of troops.
User avatar
Icehawk
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1852
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: Canada

Post by Icehawk »

Meest wrote:After reviewing it again, it is shown to fire several repeating big blasts, 3-4 pulses/sec. Maybe the rebels expected, or we didn't see any troops approaching and just turned the guns on the vehicles, to me it looks like that thing can mow down lines of troops.
I could see those weapons being usefull against AT-ST's and other light vehicles easily especially since star wars weapons have variable power settings. Although its primary purpose is no doubt to take on enemy troops.
"The Cosmos is expanding every second everyday, but their minds are slowly shrinking as they close their eyes and pray." - MC Hawking
"It's like a kids game. A morbid, blood-soaked Tetris game..." - Mike Rowe (Dirty Jobs)
Post Reply