A quick construction would suit those needs better.
What do you not get about hundred of millions of cubic kilometers worth of construction from raw materials without causing any economic troubles being in line with the canon idea of a developed galactic civilization tens of thousands of years old with billions of worlds just for mining controlled by a single corporate consortium?
Since the empire has unlimited resources available and the degree of automated labour is extremely high (as seen in AotC) the empire (in theory) was able to built as much ships and stations as it wanted.
Its limitations must therefore be grounded in something else, might it be political will or the lack of properly trained manpower (is there any source, that suggests, that some of the crews of the ships were clones?). There is no need for a huge fleet, if the majority of the entire population is rather low, concentrated in a few overly crowded places or already a willing member of your club. The fifty million colonies, that can´t afford a full planetary shield can be easily dealt with common ISDs or smaller ships, especially with hyperdrives, that achive several million times the speed of c.
To give you an example:
The unlimited resources and degree of automated labour should negate the need for a large infrastructure for something like DSII. If a construction-droid manages to build a structure with a volume of 1 million cubicmeters (a cube with a lenght of 100 meters, a very conservative estimate) per day and needs one week to build another construction-droid you would have 1,048,576 droids after five months. Let them work on DSII for the final month of the six given by the EU and you have 3.14*10^13 cubicmeters of structure. Multiply that with 8,000 and you get your 60% of a 900 kilometer battlestation. So you "only" need eight-thousand construction-droids at the beginning. If on every of your one million major worlds is only one of those droids deployed you take less than 1% of your industrial capacity away.
The other way would be the following: If it was possible for Palpatine to build up the necessary industrial infrastructure for his huge military in a few years, why shouldn´t it be possible, that the entire complex broke apart in a similar short frame of time?
The EU which better correlates with the picture given to us by canon is superior by definition. Those figures better correlate with the premises given by canon both filmic and secondary, than the rest of the EU shit.
This only works, if there is absolutely no way to rationalize both claims of the EU, the ones, that fit better with the canon and those, that don´t.
Your logic is flawed. If what you said was true, I could say Stackpole had a beam of sense in calling an ISD less than a tenth the size of the Lusankya, but then would be hypocritical in saying his combat was bunk.
You can say his combat is bunk. This changes nothing about the fact, that it is still part of SW, if we like it or not.
The fact that it comes from the EU is irrelevent; you take information on a case by case basis.
Correct. But i must also weight it against other information i have and then try to find a way to make it fit.
We can say the Death Star information is more correct because it makes more sense in the big picture--look at the millions of ships coming in-and-out of Coruscant daily, a corona of two-mile starships around Naboo, etc., etc.
However, merely these points about the Coruscanti traffic and TradeFed fleet tonnage cast EU information into doubt. When the minimalism is contrasted with opposing data--opposing data falls against the canon. Therefore the exception in the EU is taken as superior information.
You're basically saying "the EU is full of garbage, and when it isn't, well you can't take that either cuz there's other garbage."
Wrong: Your approach is "parts of the EU are garbage, so lets throw them out of the window and keep only those parts, that aren´t", while i try to keep as much of it as possible and find way to make it fit with the rest (and i willingly admit, that this doesn´t always works or is influenced by my personal likings).
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.
"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.