It's an aesthetic thing. I and others find those shots make us wonder about the contraptions in a way TIE bombers never did.
You don't get to straight facedly go 'reee nerds' while posting here Shroomy, you nerd.
Moderator: Vympel
It's an aesthetic thing. I and others find those shots make us wonder about the contraptions in a way TIE bombers never did.
You don't get to straight facedly go 'reee nerds' while posting here Shroomy, you nerd.
Q&A Rian Johnson on the evolution of the Force in 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' and more spoilers
As Obi-Wan Kenobi once told young Luke Skywalker, “The Force is what gives a Jedi his power. It’s an energy field created by all living things — it surrounds us, and penetrates us; it binds the galaxy together.”
Ever since Tatooine’s favorite farm boy learned about the Force, “Star Wars” fans have devoured every bit of the universe that’s come alive in the galaxy far, far away over the course of eight movies and counting.
But in Disney’s weekend box-office smash “Star Wars: The Last Jedi,” writer-director Rian Johnson (“Brick,” “Looper”) takes bold leaps and shakes up the “Star Wars” universe, sending “Force Awakens” heroes Rey (Daisy Ridley), Finn (John Boyega), and Poe Dameron (Oscar Isaac) further into the fight between light and dark with one surprise after another.
How much does “The Last Jedi” redefine the rules of Force physics as we know it — and what do these tantalizing new possibilities mean for the future of “Star Wars?” Who is Snoke, anyway? What exactly can Force ghosts do from beyond the astral plane? Has Kylo Ren ever kissed a girl?
Back in Los Angeles between globe-trotting appearances, a week after his star-studded premiere, Johnson answered all these burning “Star Wars” questions and more. Heavy spoiler warning: Best to read after watching “Star Wars: The Last Jedi.”
---------
“The Last Jedi” takes much of what we all thought we knew about this 40-year-old franchise and how the rules of the Force work, and expands them in some wild new ways. Knowing the doors you were going to open, what were your consultations like with Lucasfilm’s in-house protectors of the canon while writing the script?
There is a man named Pablo Hidalgo who is the sweetest dude in the universe, and he’s one of several keepers of the flame at Lucasfilm. It would always be a conversation, and if the story required it and if it felt like it stretches into new territory but doesn’t break the idea of what the Force can do, Pablo was down — I got the blessing.
The evolution of Rey’s relationship with Kylo Ren takes an intense and pivotal turn in “The Last Jedi.” We learn that Supreme Leader Snoke has linked them through the Force, as if he were connecting a call at a switchboard — an idea thematically mirrored in Poe’s “bad connection” scene with Hux earlier in the film. Where did that idea originate?
It was always through the demands of the story. With the Force connections between Rey and Kylo I thought, “OK, I need to get these two talking. But if I put them face to face they’re going to either fight, or one of them has to be tied up” —
Well, they could also make out …
They could also make out! I’m going to give you a spinoff movie …
Even if they make out, then they can’t be talking. So I knew I wanted them to talk, and to talk enough to where we could go from “I hate you,” to her being forced to actually engage with him. That’s where the idea of these “Force connections” came from, which is kind of a new thing. It’s a little bit of a riff on what happens with Vader and Luke at the end of “The Empire Strikes Back,” but it’s entirely new in some regards.
I’ve got a catchy name for Rey and Kylo’s sexy “Force connection” sessions for you: “ForceTime.”
[Laughs] I’ve heard “Force Skyping,” but that’s good! I’ve got to talk to Apple. There’s a real big co-branding opportunity here.
Some of these revelatory new Force possibilities might be challenging for fans to accept. Are they such a stretch within “Star Wars” science and the greater franchise?
The truth is, because “Star Wars” until “The Force Awakens” has been set in amber and we hadn’t had a new “Star Wars” movie in 10 years, you forget that they were introducing new Force stuff with each movie, based on the requirements of the story. Force-grabbing didn’t come around until “Empire,” it wasn’t in “A New Hope.” Same with Force ghosts. They’d introduce new ideas of what could happen with the Force each time.
After the climactic battle on the salt planet Crait we learn Luke was projecting himself from his island the whole time. How does that scene rewrite the rules of the Force? Could a Force user projecting themselves physically influence the world around them, not just the minds of others?
That’s a question. When Luke shows up he’s projecting, it’s like a hardcore variation of what Kylo and Rey have been doing the whole time and that’s why it takes so much out of him. In the version that we play, no. We tried to play really, really fair. In terms of his footsteps – we removed all of his foley — there are no footstep sounds. They never touch. And if you look, the salt flakes that are falling are sparking off of Kylo’s saber and not off of Luke’s.
What about Force ghosts and the suggestion that Jedi masters wield even more previously unknown powers from beyond the grave? Can powerful Force users create physical, tangible manifestations?
The one point where we do introduce a bit of a twist in terms of Force ghosts is where Yoda calls down the lightning onto the tree. That, I think, is a tantalizing hint of the potential of someone who is a Force ghost interacting with the real world.
Hypothetically speaking, can dark Force users become Force ghosts?
I think that would be interesting. We haven’t seen them in the movies as far as I can remember. But that would be really interesting considering the dark side is about self-preservation, trying to find immortality, and the notion that the light side actually got to it through selflessness — what would the dark side version of that look like? There’s so much cool [stuff] to think about if you’re willing to open your head a little bit!
Another surprise in this film is seeing Leia use her latent Force powers after decades of being the Skywalker twin who doesn’t wield the Force. Why was that an important parting gift to give both Leia and Carrie Fisher?
That was something Kathy [Kennedy] was always asking: Why has this never manifested in Leia? She obviously made a choice, because in “Return of the Jedi” Luke tells her, “You have that power too.” I liked the idea that it’s not Luke concentrating, reaching for the lightsaber; it’s an instinctual survival thing, like when you hear stories of a parent whose toddler is caught under a car and they get superhuman strength, or a drowning person clawing their way to the surface. It’s basically just her not being done with the fight yet.
I wanted it to happen [for Carrie] and I knew it was going to be a stretch. It’s a big moment, and I’m sure it will land different ways for different people, but for me it felt like a really emotionally satisfying thing to see.
Han’s dice are a nice touch that resonates with Luke, Leia and Kylo, not to mention the fans, and a callback to how he got the Millennium Falcon in the first place.
When I wrote it, it was something that was in “The Force Awakens.” I think they shot it and didn’t end up using it: When Han comes onto the Falcon, he takes his dice out of his pocket and hangs them back up, like, “This is mine again.” When it got pulled out [of “The Force Awakens”] I thought, even if it’s not directly set up I think you’ll get it that these are Han’s dice. The notion that they get used different ways ending with Kylo, I liked.
Fans have been obsessed with Snoke’s origins since “The Force Awakens,” and while we get to know him much more in “The Last Jedi,” you don’t necessarily give that answer. Does it matter who he was?
Not in this story it doesn’t, which is not to say it wouldn’t be interesting — they might explore it in the next movie or elsewhere. I wrote this script before “The Force Awakens” came out, so when I wrote it, the “Who is Snoke?” mania hadn’t arisen with the fans yet. Even if it had, my perspective is it’s similar to how the Emperor was handled. The first three movies you know nothing about the Emperor because you don’t have to, because that’s not the story. You know exactly what you need to know. Whereas in the prequels, you know everything about him because that is the story.
In this movie, Rey doesn’t really care where he comes from, so if in any of their scenes he had stopped and done a 30-second monologue about how he is [Darth] Plagueis or whoever, Rey would have blinked and looked confused and the scene would have gone on … and we would have ended up cutting it in the editing room because it doesn’t matter to the story right now.
Why does it matter, then, who Rey’s parents are — the idea that she doesn’t come from a lineage of “special” Jedi kin?
It felt like the way to go because it’s the hardest thing that she could possibly hear. It would be the easy thing for her to be defined by, “yes, this is how you fit into this story — it’s because your parent is so and so!” In that moment, for Kylo to be able to use that [information] as a knife and twist it to try and get what he wants, felt like the most dramatically potent option.
Please explain the dramatic necessity of giving Kylo Ren a shirtless scene.
At the premiere I heard somebody in the balcony say, “Yesssss!” You can see Adam was training hardcore throughout the whole process. It’s fun but it also has a specific purpose, which is the increasing feeling of uncomfortable intimacy. That was sticking with the theme of trying to give Rey the hardest thing you could possibly give her, which would be unavoidable intimate conversation with this person that she wants to just hate. This was just one more way of upping that ante.
So … is this the first time Kylo has ever held hands with a girl?
I actually talked about that with Adam [Driver]. Adam was like, “So … have I actually kissed a girl before?” I would think maybe he has. Maybe after hours in the Jedi camp, there was a game of spin the bottle — “spin the lightsaber…”
I saw a general discussion thread, but I didn't see a 'review' thread as such.Crazedwraith wrote: ↑2017-12-24 12:17pm My thought is... why not post this in the review thread? plenty of complaining happening there.
What's the fucking difference? Lets not split conversations everywhere.APlayerHater wrote: ↑2017-12-24 01:38pmI saw a general discussion thread, but I didn't see a 'review' thread as such.Crazedwraith wrote: ↑2017-12-24 12:17pm My thought is... why not post this in the review thread? plenty of complaining happening there.
The dice wrote: Han’s dice are a nice touch that resonates with Luke, Leia and Kylo, not to mention the fans, and a callback to how he got the Millennium Falcon in the first place.
When I wrote it, it was something that was in “The Force Awakens.” I think they shot it and didn’t end up using it: When Han comes onto the Falcon, he takes his dice out of his pocket and hangs them back up, like, “This is mine again.” When it got pulled out [of “The Force Awakens”] I thought, even if it’s not directly set up I think you’ll get it that these are Han’s dice. The notion that they get used different ways ending with Kylo, I liked.
Luke force projecting wrote:We tried to play really, really fair. In terms of his footsteps – we removed all of his foley — there are no footstep sounds. They never touch. And if you look, the salt flakes that are falling are sparking off of Kylo’s saber and not off of Luke’s.
[b]Snoke's background[/b] wrote: Not in this story it doesn’t, which is not to say it wouldn’t be interesting — they might explore it in the next movie or elsewhere. I wrote this script before “The Force Awakens” came out, so when I wrote it, the “Who is Snoke?” mania hadn’t arisen with the fans yet. Even if it had, my perspective is it’s similar to how the Emperor was handled. The first three movies you know nothing about the Emperor because you don’t have to, because that’s not the story. You know exactly what you need to know. Whereas in the prequels, you know everything about him because that is the story.
In this movie, Rey doesn’t really care where he comes from, so if in any of their scenes he had stopped and done a 30-second monologue about how he is [Darth] Plagueis or whoever, Rey would have blinked and looked confused and the scene would have gone on … and we would have ended up cutting it in the editing room because it doesn’t matter to the story right now.
On Rey's parants or lack thereof wrote:It felt like the way to go because it’s the hardest thing that she could possibly hear. It would be the easy thing for her to be defined by, “yes, this is how you fit into this story — it’s because your parent is so and so!” In that moment, for Kylo to be able to use that [information] as a knife and twist it to try and get what he wants, felt like the most dramatically potent option.
Ruan Johnson could have added a brief line of how Snoke once hunted the Jedi under Darth Vader. It would have been sufficient to explain his background- and his contempt gor Kylo Ren's hero worship.Ace Pace wrote: ↑2017-12-24 04:00pm So Rian Johnson was interviewed and answered many questions that came up here, link for anyone interested.
The dice wrote: Han’s dice are a nice touch that resonates with Luke, Leia and Kylo, not to mention the fans, and a callback to how he got the Millennium Falcon in the first place.
When I wrote it, it was something that was in “The Force Awakens.” I think they shot it and didn’t end up using it: When Han comes onto the Falcon, he takes his dice out of his pocket and hangs them back up, like, “This is mine again.” When it got pulled out [of “The Force Awakens”] I thought, even if it’s not directly set up I think you’ll get it that these are Han’s dice. The notion that they get used different ways ending with Kylo, I liked.Luke force projecting wrote:We tried to play really, really fair. In terms of his footsteps – we removed all of his foley — there are no footstep sounds. They never touch. And if you look, the salt flakes that are falling are sparking off of Kylo’s saber and not off of Luke’s.[b]Snoke's background[/b] wrote: Not in this story it doesn’t, which is not to say it wouldn’t be interesting — they might explore it in the next movie or elsewhere. I wrote this script before “The Force Awakens” came out, so when I wrote it, the “Who is Snoke?” mania hadn’t arisen with the fans yet. Even if it had, my perspective is it’s similar to how the Emperor was handled. The first three movies you know nothing about the Emperor because you don’t have to, because that’s not the story. You know exactly what you need to know. Whereas in the prequels, you know everything about him because that is the story.
In this movie, Rey doesn’t really care where he comes from, so if in any of their scenes he had stopped and done a 30-second monologue about how he is [Darth] Plagueis or whoever, Rey would have blinked and looked confused and the scene would have gone on … and we would have ended up cutting it in the editing room because it doesn’t matter to the story right now.On Rey's parants or lack thereof wrote:It felt like the way to go because it’s the hardest thing that she could possibly hear. It would be the easy thing for her to be defined by, “yes, this is how you fit into this story — it’s because your parent is so and so!” In that moment, for Kylo to be able to use that [information] as a knife and twist it to try and get what he wants, felt like the most dramatically potent option.
There's a difference between "our heavy fighter can be equipped with a bomb armament for situational use" and "we have invested in a wing of craft which only work in a gravity well and can attack only from one vector."Vympel wrote: ↑2017-12-24 06:22amI still don't understand how there's an entire discussion tangent about the way the Resistance bombers dropped their bombs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phGlo_TNDp0
You dislike repetition of the OT, but you like the carbon-copy of Hoth with bigger walkers, higher stakes, and shittier speeders? What did you think of the Royal Guard? How about TFA and its bigger Death Star with the same weakness? The outcast Force-user with mysterious parents from a desert world? These new films have been nothing but recycled shots from the original trilogy with half-assed attempts at an new plot thrown in. And dumb shit leadership.Nephtys wrote: ↑2017-12-24 05:34pm That's why I like TLJ a hell of a lot. It's /better/ than a lot of trash we've come to expect from Star Wars, such as the entire EU that is nothing but derivative coat-hanging on the OT, that diminishes the storytelling potential of the universe, not increasing it.
I think some of these fans looked at these issues from an RPG-like perspective, not all. However, there are narrative reasons why they are problematic as well.Nephtys wrote: ↑2017-12-24 05:34pm This seems the fundamental difference.
People who dislike TLJ because it didn't explain snoke, didn't give Rey magic parents, didn't provide a detailed background on the new republic, or the Jedi have different power levels--- are trying to fit it in the old EU type of writing. Where everything is set up to be about as detailed as an RPG setting.
Snoke could have said 'I once hunted Jedi as part of blah blah'. But what does that do? It just wastes time, disrupts the narrative, and diminishes him as a character that ONCE AGAIN is only important because he was Palpatine's room mate at some point, or once loaned money to Porkins.
In the world of TLJ, He's just the Supreme Leader. He's got force magic, and he wants very badly to kill Skywalker who is a potential huge threat to him. What was his role? To be background to accentuate the development of the central character: Kylo Ren. How did he tempt Kylo? Doesn't matter. It may even have just been a minor red herring. The real fuckup was Luke's all along.
That's why I like TLJ a hell of a lot. It's /better/ than a lot of trash we've come to expect from Star Wars, such as the entire EU that is nothing but derivative coat-hanging on the OT, that diminishes the storytelling potential of the universe, not increasing it.
No!Nephtys wrote: ↑2017-12-24 05:34pm This seems the fundamental difference.
People who dislike TLJ because it didn't explain snoke, didn't give Rey magic parents, didn't provide a detailed background on the new republic, or the Jedi have different power levels--- are trying to fit it in the old EU type of writing. Where everything is set up to be about as detailed as an RPG setting.
What is does is either set up a plot hole or turn him into a 2D cutout. Either is bad.Snoke could have said 'I once hunted Jedi as part of blah blah'. But what does that do? It just wastes time, disrupts the narrative, and diminishes him as a character that ONCE AGAIN is only important because he was Palpatine's room mate at some point, or once loaned money to Porkins.
In the world of TLJ, He's just the Supreme Leader. He's got force magic, and he wants very badly to kill Skywalker who is a potential huge threat to him. What was his role? To be background to accentuate the development of the central character: Kylo Ren. How did he tempt Kylo? Doesn't matter. It may even have just been a minor red herring. The real fuckup was Luke's all along.
That's why I like TLJ a hell of a lot. It's /better/ than a lot of trash we've come to expect from Star Wars, such as the entire EU that is nothing but derivative coat-hanging on the OT, that diminishes the storytelling potential of the universe, not increasing it.
I'm going into this blind. I may or may not agree with you. Though, as a overall sense, I did not like the movie.APlayerHater wrote: ↑2017-12-24 12:04pm Everything below here is spoilers: Fair Warning.
People have pointed out the many flaws to this movie in another thread, but I thought I'd dedicate a whole thread solely to complaining about this movie.
I guess people could also defend the movie if they wanted to. I'm not going to bother doing any "I told you so"s to any Rey defenders about her being a Mary Sue. I mean, she still is, arguably even more so than before (where did she learn to swim?), but she's hardly the worst thing in this movie.
My personal disappointments:
Yes and no, in my opinion. The movie goes out of it's way to show Rey had some training at some point in Melee combat. Her swinging her staff about at the rock is regimented and in my opinion meant to show she was following a training regimen of some sort with her staff. Granted, sword fighting and staff training are different, but basic 'melee' training is more than Luke Skywalker had and while Ben Kenobi gave him a few hours of on the Falcon, you really don't see Yoda give him.No Jedi Training:
- Having Rey master every force ability in TFA with zero training just created a scenario in this movie where Luke has nothing to teach her. I honestly think if the writers or director of this movie could think of a single lesson for Luke to teach Rey, they would have thrown it in this movie. The only thing Rey learns in this film is sword techniques... Which I guess she just figures out on her own by swinging at a rock for about 10 hours.
Yeah, I agree. If Rey is naturally strong in the Force, then show her just having raw power. When Snoke lays her flat with Force long-time push, or what ever you want to call it, should have been her move. If she is soooooo strong in the Force but has shit for training, her moves should be just that. Sloppy force pushes that take 3-5 dudes off their feet, smashes walls and computers and shit. Vaders scene in ROTS at the end comes to mind where he just crushes shit on instinct or reflex.Next time we see her pick up a lightsaber, she beats Luke in a stick-fighting duel. Then the next time she picks up a lightsaber she takes on 10 master swordsmen. To my knowledge jedi train for decades to master swordsmanship, but screw it; let's just dumb everything down for plot convenience. You could say Luke never trained with a lightsaber, but he also lost his 1 fight in TESB, had his hand chopped off, and Vader wasn't even trying to kill him.
It teased some 'balance of the Force' shit and failed to deliver. I'm disappointed at it for just that.All we learn about the force in this movie is that it's an energy field created by all living things. It surrounds and penetrates us and binds the galaxy together... So more rehashing.[/list]
Not sure I agree, though I do think it was by writers fiat some of the time.Power Creep:
- Just like in TFA, there's a massive power creep in what force users can do. Ever since Disney took over, it seems like they have no idea how to make the movie exciting except to just make the new characters more powerful.
Vader was able to choke someone on his own ship, using the TV screen to eyeball where the guy was on it. Now Snoke can pick you up and throw you around from a hyperspace jump away like it's no big deal.
Snoke can totally immobilize other force users and throw them around, while simultaneously reading their minds. He can also use Sith lightning; I'd ask how he learned such a power, but we've already established you no longer need to be taught force powers; you just pick them when you level up.
Master Yoda had to focus, close his eyes, and slowly lift an X Wing out of a lake. Similarly, Yoda had to focus to deflect a tiny amount of rocks dropped on him by Dooku. Rey can casually pick up many tons of rocks with a simple thought.
Yoda summons a lightning bolt.
Force astral projection to another planet light years away.
Snoke's Mind-Linking powers and (apparently) long-ranged Kylo-Corrupting powers, that somehow corrupted Kylo at Jedi Academy. Unless Snoke was an Alex-Jones-type alternative news anchor I have no idea how he could have corrupted Kylo without having met him. Unless Snoke was just hanging out near the Jedi academy in his sexy silk robe, selling the kids cigarettes.
Totally agree. A wink and a nod is nice, straight up reshooting scenes is shitty writing and bad movie making.This Movie is a Mash-Up of TESB and RotJ, but with the scenes rearranged in random order:
- This movie begins with the space-battle portion of the battle of Hoth, with ships fleeing a planet while orbital bombardment destroys a rebel base.
Let alone I watched this in the Clone Wars for 3 episodes years ago.It then becomes the part of TESB where Han and Leia have a deactivated hyperdrive and are trying to evade the Empire. Except it's now just Leia fleeing the Empire and they can't use the Hyperdrive because plot. To be fair, the hyperdrive has never worked in any of these movies.
Not sure I'd call him Lando, but yes, this whole bit is soooooooooooo bad.Rose and Finn then go to Casino Planet (Cloud City) to get help to escape the empire (using a ship with a working hyperdrive to escape. One wonders why all the resistance members didn't just pile into different transports and hyperdrive in different directions. Or you could have sent Rose and Finn ahead to the secret base to send out the distress signal... Or just have Rose and Finn fly off somewhere in the galaxy to get a distress signal out... Or send all those ships on autopilot to hyperspace ram Snoke's ship...).
--Anyway, Rose and Finn go to get someones help and are also betrayed to the empire by the person they asked for help. So, you know, same difference. Sicario Guy is Lando.
All in all I didn't mind the Luke/Rey scenes, they were a bit boring, really didn't accomplish anything, but there weren't bad per say.Rey goes to a secluded planet in the middle of nowhere to meet a hermit Jedi-Master and be trained in the ways of the force, just like Luke. Like Yoda, Luke refuses to train Leia at first until convinced by a ghost to do so. Rey leaves to go track down Kylo against the advice of Luke (like Luke in Empire), although in this movie it's not to save her friends with the resistance (I guess since she's known about the resistance for about... 2 hours now), but just because she's now Kylo's friend or something; she didn't seem to care about the Resistance ships getting blown up until Snoke pointed it out to her.
There is a throne room scene basically identical to the one in RotJ. Rey willingly surrenders to TFA just like Luke to the Empire. They take an elevator up to the throne room. Snoke shows Rey the fleet being destroyed and tells her the rebellion will be wiped out, but she refuses to yield so Snoke renders her helpless and is about to kill her. Snoke is then betrayed by his pupil; although in this movie it's not because Rey has brought out the goodness in Kylo and made him realize that he was wrong, but because they're friends now or something.[/quote
Indeed, it was bad.
Indeed, bad and pointless and has nothing to do with anything. It could have been deleted and the movie's outcome is the same.Finn and the gang go to a snow planet, but it's salt so it's not snow; it just looks the same and there are imperial walkers there trying to take out a rebel base, and the heroes have to go out in little ships to fight the walkers. At least in Empire they had a plan, in this movie they just ride out on their little ships that don't have any weapons, and accomplish nothing. They don't even slow down the empire in setting up their stupid laser battering ram, they accomplish nothing in this scene. These characters could have just stayed in doors and had some kind of character-building moment or something, waiting for death... Or we could have used this time in the movie to put some Luke/Rey training in. This scene is pointless.
I'm of two minds. I don't really mind the ... mind fuck. But to have Luke die because of it was dumb. It's right up there with Cpt Kirk being killed falling off a shitty little bridge.Luke then appears and walks outside to sacrifice himself and buy more time for his friends to escape, dueling his old Padawan to prevent Kylo from walking through a door, just like Obi Wan. Luke then ceases to exist and become one with the force after distracting Kylo with a sword fight for a few seconds... To be fair, this was a scene from ANH that they're ripping off.
Didn't mind that, hope for the younger generation has been a good theme all through the series.The film then ends with a little slave boy looking off at the stars and showing us he has force powers, and a rebellion-branded ring, which was probably a McDonalds Happy Meal tie-in or something.[/list]
Agreed. Yoda was wasted and bad in this.Yoda Puppet Looked Terrible:
- The Yoda Puppet was awful, the lightning summoning was silly (accomplished nothing anyway, which is the theme of this movie.) The Yoda Puppet seems more puppetlike than the original; they wanted you to know this was a puppet. His cane-motions are exaggerated when he walks, just so you know for a 'fact' that there is someone under the frame, moving that cane and carrying the puppet along with an exaggerated bobbing motion. It looks like someone doing an impression of the way Yoda moves.
Yoda's face is stuck in this super chubby-cheeked smile, his mouth barely flaps and it looks like a nutcracker while doing so, and his forehead is completely sunken in. Also he's this super extreme shade of green, although that could be due to the blue ghost FX they used.
Yoda's voice sounds terrible and his personality is wrong. I know it's Frank Oz, but he sounds like someone doing a bad impression of Yoda. The character even acts like a doofus, despite Yoda only ever acting silly as a way of testing Luke on Dago bah and hiding his identity. Every time after that in Empire and Jedi, he never cracks any jokes. Also he uses the phrase "page-turner," like this 900 year old dead jedi is throwing around jokes we'd use in 2017.
Why does Yoda suddenly think the Jedi suck as well? What? --I guess he must have known the tree was empty, so maybe he doesn't. Who knows.
Is the actual title of the movie. SW: the Wasted Potential. SWTWP.Wasted Potential:
This seems like a massive problem to me. I'm not saying they should let the audience reaction dictate entirely how the story goes, but I do think it's stupid and shortsighted for them to completely disregard it. However, since Abrams made his story pitch for Episode IX after the release of TLJ, it doesn't appear to be Lucasfilm's standard operating procedure anymore.
A lot of those motifs are pretty damn repetitive, it's true. But perhaps part of it was the fake-out. Second Hoth set up at least the interesting visual of the red salt and was only really there to have Luke fade into the sunset and save the day one last time (and draw his closure with Kylo). It'd have been better if it was a different set-up, it's true.KraytKing wrote: ↑2017-12-24 06:53pmYou dislike repetition of the OT, but you like the carbon-copy of Hoth with bigger walkers, higher stakes, and shittier speeders? What did you think of the Royal Guard? How about TFA and its bigger Death Star with the same weakness? The outcast Force-user with mysterious parents from a desert world? These new films have been nothing but recycled shots from the original trilogy with half-assed attempts at an new plot thrown in. And dumb shit leadership.Nephtys wrote: ↑2017-12-24 05:34pm That's why I like TLJ a hell of a lot. It's /better/ than a lot of trash we've come to expect from Star Wars, such as the entire EU that is nothing but derivative coat-hanging on the OT, that diminishes the storytelling potential of the universe, not increasing it.
When her character first appeared on screen, after being introduced as "Vice Admiral Holdo", my literal first thought was: "Why isn't she in uniform?". Apparently this is explained away by a side book story where she was a dignitary, like Leia was, in their younger days. So she must have been away from the Resistance base at the time of the events of TFA; but comes back in time for the evacuation. It's not really a good reason in my book, but eh.GuppyShark wrote: ↑2017-12-25 04:00am I agree with you on most counts, but what the fuck are you doing judging Holdo by her attire? I don't even remember what she wore, I was too busy trying to figure out if Poe was right or not.