Imperial Landing Craft armrament

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Surlethe
HATES GRADING
Posts: 12269
Joined: 2004-12-29 03:41pm

Post by Surlethe »

Bounty wrote:Do you have the AOTC ICS? Could you check to see if it says anything about the atmospheric shielding? Just to make sure it's not something the wiki made up.
I don't see anything about atmospheric shielding. It does mention that there's an indicator for the atmospheric integrity of the forward compartments and cockpits, if that helps at all.

I suspect that atmospheric shielding is made up, myself, since "LAAT" stand for "Low Altitude Atmospheric Transport", and clonetrooper armor is very strongly insulated and has self-contained breathing anyway.
A Government founded upon justice, and recognizing the equal rights of all men; claiming higher authority for existence, or sanction for its laws, that nature, reason, and the regularly ascertained will of the people; steadily refusing to put its sword and purse in the service of any religious creed or family is a standing offense to most of the Governments of the world, and to some narrow and bigoted people among ourselves.
F. Douglass
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

Assuming it extends straight over the hatches, won't an LAAT/i's normal particle shielding trap the atmosphere within the passenger compartment when the doors are open? Assuming the skintight shielding just stretched over the doors openings, of course.

Regardless, even if it was a vacuum inside the crew compartment during orbital deployment (as in the CW series), clone trooper armor probably easily keeps its wearer comfortable during that time.


Also, another general question.. with repulsorlift technology, is re-entry heat still an unavoidable problem? A repulsorlift can essentially supply a force to negate and even overcome gravity (i.e. when leaving a planet), so can't a ship just fly down to the surface at a velocity of the pilot's choosing?
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Post by Imperial Overlord »

Cykeisme wrote: Also, another general question.. with repulsorlift technology, is re-entry heat still an unavoidable problem? A repulsorlift can essentially supply a force to negate and even overcome gravity (i.e. when leaving a planet), so can't a ship just fly down to the surface at a velocity of the pilot's choosing?
Would you want to go slowly through the atmosphere when someone is firing on you with computer assisted quad laser batteries?
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
(name here)
Youngling
Posts: 103
Joined: 2007-03-17 10:00pm

Post by (name here) »

If the shield can withstand wars starfighter weapons for an extended period of time, then it can probably withstand atmospheric reentry. I don't know how many joules reentry generates, but since IIRC blaster handguns can generate an estimated 280 MJ, starfighter weapons may be more dangerous. Further, the shield only has to keep the temperature low enough to allow the armor of the troops to deal with it, meaning the jobs is less strenuous than maintaining room temperature inside.
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

Imperial Overlord wrote:
Cykeisme wrote: Also, another general question.. with repulsorlift technology, is re-entry heat still an unavoidable problem? A repulsorlift can essentially supply a force to negate and even overcome gravity (i.e. when leaving a planet), so can't a ship just fly down to the surface at a velocity of the pilot's choosing?
Would you want to go slowly through the atmosphere when someone is firing on you with computer assisted quad laser batteries?
Absolutely, you wouldn't want to.. and re-entry heat wouldn't be a problem anyway even for ships with non-combat grade shielding. For SW interstellar craft, immunity to micrometeorite, background cosmic radiation and re-entry heat are probably requirements as basic as wheels on cars.

Still, I'm just saying that having a significant turning portion of your gravitational potential energy being converted into heat as a corridor of atmosphere is compressed as a craft re-enters is not a necessary problem like in real life, when we're talking about SW craft which have repulsors.

(name here) wrote:Further, the shield only has to keep the temperature low enough to allow the armor of the troops to deal with it, meaning the jobs is less strenuous than maintaining room temperature inside.
Indeed, it probably increases the parameters for "survivability" somewhat when the crew is individually wrapped in life support/armor.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
Post Reply