Desdinova wrote:Krayt is as legitimate as you're going to get, although I'm very much amused at the importance some of you place on:
-Bane, the founder of a Sith Order more interested in hiding and playing power games for a thousand years than doing anything significant in the galaxy.
Too bad that silly shit worked for his Order and Sidious, right?
Desdinova wrote:-Nihilus, whose claim to fame is that he could eat the life force of planets, yet still be defeated by a second-rate video game character.
Yeah, and legitimacy has what to do with following or political accomplishments. If a jackass usurps someone's throne or sets up a military dictatorship, and is famous, that makes him a legitimate successor? If the sedevacantist Antipope Peter II (Manuel Alonso Corral) has more followers than Saint Peter, is he a more legitimate claimant to being Bishop of Rome with respect to Roman Catholicism?
Desdinova wrote:-Addendu who... wait, sorry, we know nothing about this mummified clown.
Ditto.
Desdinova wrote:So Krayt singlehandedly resurrects the Sith and brings them to a level of power unheard of since Palpatine's time. These three old farts are probably just jealous that none of them could do anything remotely similar.
Okay? Not only do political accomplishments - in a vacuum and not accounting for circumstances or other variables, as well - not necessarily imply more political skill, or proficiency in any other skill set. Again, if the sedevacantist Antipope Peter II has more followers than Saint Peter, is he a better theologian? A better politician? More divinely inspired? Is General Augusto Pinochet Ugarte, the successful leader of a military coup and thereafter, President of the Government Junta, a better tactician than the merely General George S. Patton? Marcus Antonius Gordianus (Gordian I) donned the purple and became the Emperor of Rome in 238. He ruled over a significantly larger territory than Prince Bismarck. Does that mean the former is a more successful leader than the latter? A more able politician?
Desdinova wrote:That being said, if you're going to dismiss the XoXaan holocron as "a glorified CD," you have to do the same for the holocrons of the three ass-clowns mentioned above. Consistency matters, after all.
Except you are implying that his finding and using the "glorified CD tutorial" automatically affords him with legitimacy with respect to the Sith religion, and also claiming that it is supporting evidence for his capability relative to other well-known Sith Lords. I never said that any of those Sith Lords' holocrons implied anything of the sort. Listening to Darth Sidious' editor's notes in the Telos Holocron does not make one the Sith Master of the Order of the Sith Lords. Nor does it make one the Galactic Emperor of the First Galactic Empire.
Desdinova wrote:(Side note-I've long been amused that, despite the scale most here embrace for the military-industrial, historical and technological capabilities of the Star Wars universe, there are still a number who cry foul at the thought of someone living to the two hundreds. Whatever. I like the comics just fine, especially since, like Cade, I didn't know who Hett was beforehand.)
That doesn't make Hett intrinsically less of a stupid character, or less of a bad choice to be the evil terrible Sith Lord, who apparently cannot even get a break from millennia-old dead guys who're supposed to be his ideological forbearers. And regardless of how you spin it, they very very nearly killed him in order while making fun of his ass.