The (strictly) Theoretical Intelligence Agency that is the Ubiqtorate wrote:In general address:
Of course, there remains the unsubstantiated allegation of the counterrevolutionary fighter pilot Mister Celchu, who remarked that Imperial doctrine eschews deflector shields for Imperial fighter craft on the grounds that "without shields, pilots will double their efforts not to get hit" (quoted from "The Phantom Affair").
"Counterrevolutionary?" Since when did our Emperor become Communist? Has Imperial Intelligence suddenly been replaced by the NKVD, and if so, why hasn't Comrade Sanchez been informed?
"Insurrectionist" or, as some nonexistant organizations prefer, "Terrorist" would be better. (Yes, I'm nitpicking)
Qualitatively, the Ubiqtorate notes that it would be his or her preference to ignore the tiresome "TIEs have no shields or ejector seats" idea contained in the Expanded Universe; the performance of the counterrevolutionary Alliance's starfighters in the Battle of Yavin was not especially impressive, given that only Black Squadron was mobilised against them, and only three of thirty starfighters survived the assault, despite Mister Tanbris's statement that the starfighters were too fast for the Death Star's turbolasers to accurately track. One must question the validity of the constant assumption that Imperial starfighters are markedly inferior, given the rather dismal performance of the X-wings and Y-wings at Yavin when faced with properly trained enemy pilots and well-maintained, older model TIE fighters.
On the other hand, probably half of the Rebel starfighters were older Y-Wing models, and those apparently dedicated to the strike role at Yavin. They would have been easy prey for the attacking TIE Fighters, especially if they were picked off while in the Trench Run, unable to effectively maneuver or strike back.
It would be interesting to find out how many starfighters were destroyed while in the trench versus in combat above the Death Star's superstructure.
The Expanded Universe provides some further illustrations of this: If Colonel Soontir, Baron Fel, General Turr Phennir, and Tan Maarek Stele were able to achieve careers as decorated and remarkably successful as those of Generals Keyan Farlander, Luke Skywalker, and Wedge Antilles, and the latter three had the benefits of well-shielded, long-range starfighters, who is in fact the superior pilot?
A very interesting question. Baron Fel seems to be a superior pilot compared to any in the Rebellion or it's sucessors, the Republic or the Alliance. His son seemed to be quite excellent as well, though he flew the "TIE Claw" advanced starfighter against early-run T-65XJ X-Wings, since replaced by the XJ3 iteration.
As for the rest, this Rebel's intelligence files are sorely lacking on their performance; what I have is not enough to compare to General Farlander, General Antilles and Jedi Master Skywalker.