Could mechanical Vader beat ANYONE??

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

A high midichlorian count does not a skilled Jedi make. Just because you have long fingers, does that mean you can be a skilled pianist? It requires practice, tuning, and concentration. This is why Tyrannus defeated Anakin so easily in AotC. He was more experienced.
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Stuart Mackey »

FOG3 wrote:
Stuart Mackey wrote:Anakin had the highest midi-colrian count ever seen. He was regarded by the Emperor to [have the potential to] be[come] more powerful than Yoda and himself. Thus we have a base line of power. In RotJ {novel}The Emperor is shown to be afraid of Lukes power.
Correction: Anakin had the highest midichlorian count recorded at that time in relation to Jedi files in existence at that time. Evidence midi-chlorian testing was actually being conducted and recorded prior to the Battle of Ruusan? Furthermore evidence that said records survived previous engagements including but not limited to the war with Exar Kun and the resulting damage to Ossus, in addition to the things Darth Revan and Darth Treya did effectively bringing to the order to its knees. Your unqualified generalization is not justified based on what you've brought forward.


Ask yourself these questions. You cannot prove a negative and the novels and movies are silent on such extended history, but they do clearly indicate that records were kept and that the Jedi had access to them and later so did the Sith. It is quite resonable to beleive that Qui-Gon, Palpatine ["Darth Vader will become more powerfull than either of us"] and Vader himself know what they are talking about.
All it indicates is where the various players in the days of the Galactic Empire considered things to stand, based on their perspective. From there knowing how things played out we have a rough idea of how things stood among them, but you can't just say Luke's the most powerful Jedi _ever_ with it. Unqualified generalizations require a lot more work to not be apocryphal then that.
Darth Vader wrote: Obi-Wan was gone, and the other Jedi were extinct, save one, who was the strongest of them all. His own son
SotE is a higher level of canon than a game. Moreover, you do not know what Vader knows or did not know or the Emperor for that matter. But lets let a G level bit of canon talk.
Yoda in RotS novel on page 225 wrote: This truth: that he, the avatar of the light, Supreme Master of the Jedi order, the fiercest, most implacable, most devastatingly powerful foe the darkness had ever known...
just-
didnt-
have it.
Palpatine was more powerfull than Yoda. And the RotJ novel, omnibus page 466 and 474, clearly states that Palpatine is afraid of Luke.
Also its pointless to talk about what knowldge was lost or was not lost, you cannot prove a negative.
Your argument is like saying that because we dont know everything about the Hittite army that they must be more powerfull than a modern army. Its a strawman in otherwords.

Addendum: Even then there is on screen evidence that pure potential doesn't automatically equate to power in the sense of being on a whole different level, ergo Tyrannus vs Anakin and Kenobi vs Vader. If pure potential was all there was to it, there was no way Anakin could have lost like he did, no? Seems as how Tyrannus handed Anakin his rear on a silver platter in AotC, he must not have been worth recruitng, huh? Or are you going to make a special case for the guy whose spent most of his life training to be a Jedi over the one who basically got accelerated 101?
WTF are you going on about?

In addition there are known to exist techniques that involved the user basically feeding of their victim, so that the stronger the victim was in the Force the stronger they were. These Malachor techniques however were likely effectively sealed and forgotten.
How does that invalidate canon? What does it have to do with Luke Skywalker?
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Stuart Mackey »

Cos Dashit wrote:A high midichlorian count does not a skilled Jedi make. Just because you have long fingers, does that mean you can be a skilled pianist? It requires practice, tuning, and concentration. This is why Tyrannus defeated Anakin so easily in AotC. He was more experienced.
Yes, and? Its not nice to take something out of context.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Stuart Mackey wrote:Palpatine was more powerfull than Yoda.
What is your basis for this? Are you referring to the RotS battle in which Yoda loses?
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Stuart Mackey »

Cos Dashit wrote:
Stuart Mackey wrote:Palpatine was more powerfull than Yoda.
What is your basis for this? Are you referring to the RotS battle in which Yoda loses?
Yes, and the nature of that fight is eleborated on in the canon novel.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Just because you lose to someone once doesn't mean that they are better than you. Yoda was probably still saddened about the great Jedi Purge, if you recall right before the fight happened Palpatine atttempted to leave and get away from the Jedi Master.
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Stuart Mackey »

Cos Dashit wrote:Just because you lose to someone once doesn't mean that they are better than you. Yoda was probably still saddened about the great Jedi Purge, if you recall right before the fight happened Palpatine atttempted to leave and get away from the Jedi Master.
Yoda wrote: This truth: that he, the avatar of the light, Supreme Master of the Jedi order, the fiercest, most implacable, most devastatingly powerful foe the darkness had ever known...
just-
didnt-
have it.
Yoda admits he cannot defeat Palpatine.
Furthermore, that Palpatine attempted to flee does not mean anything at all in and of itself. IIRC the Sith had abandond using lightsabres except to humiliate the odd Jedi.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Sure, Yoda might have not been able to defeat him when he was 900 years old fighting a young kid, which Palpatine was in comparison to Yoda. Yoda in his prime would have wiped the floor with Palpatine in any stage, hands down.
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by Stuart Mackey »

Cos Dashit wrote:Sure, Yoda might have not been able to defeat him when he was 900 years old fighting a young kid, which Palpatine was in comparison to Yoda. Yoda in his prime would have wiped the floor with Palpatine in any stage, hands down.
:roll: That would have to be the stupidest statement I have seen in a week.
It is irrelivant what Yoda could have done when younger because Palpatine wasnt alive then. Moreover you forget that for Jedi there is the "we are not this crude matter" while also forgetting that Palpatine was not a young man either. You have also ignored a canon statement on just what Yoda was, which is just as stupid.

You also got Yoda's age wrong.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
Eleas
Jaina Dax
Posts: 4896
Joined: 2002-07-08 05:08am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Eleas »

Most damning of all is the simple fact that Yoda isn't hampered by his age. This can easily be verified by simply looking at his fighting style. He leaps, cavorts, jumps, spins. In combat, he shows all the hallmarks of an acrobat in the prime of his life; this is, of course, due to Yoda boosting himself with the Force.

One might say that Yoda, if he were younger, could have used that power to attack Palpatine with the Force, but that's an overly hasty statement. If the boost weakened Yoda's use of the Force in other ways, he would fight more conservatively; he's good enough to know how to do this, yet opts not to. Also, a younger Yoda would not yet necessarily have achieved the mastery over the Force that the 900 year old swamp muppet has.

As for the recurrence of the old "styles" nonsense in this thread... please oh fucking please stop attributing decisive effectiveness in combat to "unconventional style" bullcrap. Vader beat Jedi after Jedi because he was powerful enough to, in essence, negate their advantages in speed and acrobatics, while outmaneuvering them mentally and power-wise. The fact that he still retained a good degree of skill was just icing.

When two masters of multiple sword forms fight each other, it goes down to effective skill. An unconventional style might... might give its user a tiny edge. Anything more than that is pure fancy, particularly given the fact that every swordsman develops his own unique body of preferred techniques -- style -- sooner or later.
Björn Paulsen

"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Yoda was so dissapointed in himself after his so-called 'loss' to Palpatine, he decided to go into exile. If he expected himself to lose, he would not have taken the loss so hard.
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Eleas
Jaina Dax
Posts: 4896
Joined: 2002-07-08 05:08am
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Eleas »

Cos Dashit wrote:Yoda was so dissapointed in himself after his so-called 'loss' to Palpatine, he decided to go into exile. If he expected himself to lose, he would not have taken the loss so hard.
...so? I'm not sure what you're trying to say, here.
Björn Paulsen

"Travelers with closed minds can tell us little except about themselves."
--Chinua Achebe
User avatar
Darth Yoshi
Metroid
Posts: 7342
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:00pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Darth Yoshi »

Have you read the novel, Cos? Yoda realizes that he can't beat Palpatine during the whole Force Lightning barrage in the Senate Chamber. He goes in expecting to win, and finds out he can't.
Image
Fragment of the Lord of Nightmares, release thy heavenly retribution. Blade of cold, black nothingness: become my power, become my body. Together, let us walk the path of destruction and smash even the souls of the Gods! RAGNA BLADE!
Lore Monkey | the Pichu-master™
Secularism—since AD 80
Av: Elika; Prince of Persia
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Darth Yoshi wrote:Have you read the novel, Cos? Yoda realizes that he can't beat Palpatine during the whole Force Lightning barrage in the Senate Chamber. He goes in expecting to win, and finds out he can't.
Yeah, that's what I was saying about his expecting to win but not being able to. I got that from the film, although I have never read the novel. I don't understand why Yoda thought he couldn't win during the Force-lightning battle, he turned the tables and blasted Palpatine backward, although he flew back as well. Do you think you could get me a quote from the book regarding Yoda's thoughts as the fight was going on?
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Darth Yoshi
Metroid
Posts: 7342
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:00pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Darth Yoshi »

He survived the barrage. IIRC, withstanding the last attack pretty much drained him. Unfortunately, I don't have the book, so I can't provide quotes.
Image
Fragment of the Lord of Nightmares, release thy heavenly retribution. Blade of cold, black nothingness: become my power, become my body. Together, let us walk the path of destruction and smash even the souls of the Gods! RAGNA BLADE!
Lore Monkey | the Pichu-master™
Secularism—since AD 80
Av: Elika; Prince of Persia
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

nitpicking ahoy!

Post by Kurgan »

Noble Ire wrote: A decent Force-user can defend against and negate a Force Choke or similar technique in battle, perhaps even passively. That would only work if your opponent was already all but defeated.
Yeah, a decent Force user like Obi-Wan. Oh wait...

People always forget that scene! This to me is conclusive proof that the old "they can't use offensive force powers during a duel" is not a hard and fast rule, if it's even a rule at all! There's other examples too (the use of Force Push with Anakin vs. Obi-Wan in ROTS, Dooku vs. Yoda in AOTC, Maul vs. Obi-Wan in TPM).

And what's with this "grey Jedi" stuff early on in the thread? Wouldn't you say that all non-Sith we've seen in the movies are "grey Jedi"? Isn't that a bit absurd? Perhaps people have this standard external to the movies of what a "Light Sider" really is, and thus they accuse the movie Jedi of being deviants. Perhaps the movie Jedi are in fact the standard, and our ideas of what a Light Sider are, are distorted? Just a thought...

Lord Revan wrote:to date the only Jedi to have defeated Vader is Luke Skywalker(as in the son of Anakin Skywalker) and it's quite clear that Luke is not just another jedi to Vader, from the EU I've read it's quite clear that Vader loses focus if confronted with things Anakin Skywalker cared about.
Obi-Wan defeated Vader in ROTS. Dooku defeated him in AOTC, but that was before he became Vader. Of course if you're arguing who's defeated him while in the suit then that's different. ;)
Stuart Mackey wrote:Yoda admits he cannot defeat Palpatine.
Furthermore, that Palpatine attempted to flee does not mean anything at all in and of itself. IIRC the Sith had abandond using lightsabres except to humiliate the odd Jedi.
What?? All the Sith we've seen in the movies have used lightsabers. And not just to "humiliate Jedi" but to defend their own lives in combat!
fun/fantasy movies existed before the overrated Star Wars came out. What made it seem 'less dark' was the sheer goofy aspect of it: two robots modeled on Laurel & Hardy, and a smartass outlaw with bigfoot co-pilot and their hotrod pizza-shaped ship, and they were sucked aboard a giant Disco Ball. -adw1
Someone asked me yesterday if Dracula met Saruman and there was a fight, who would win. I just looked at this man. What an idiotic thing to say. I mean really, it was half-witted. - Christopher Lee

Image
JKA Server 2024
User avatar
Noble Ire
The Arbiter
Posts: 5938
Joined: 2005-04-30 12:03am
Location: Beyond the Outer Rim

Post by Noble Ire »

Yeah, a decent Force user like Obi-Wan. Oh wait...

People always forget that scene! This to me is conclusive proof that the old "they can't use offensive force powers during a duel" is not a hard and fast rule, if it's even a rule at all! There's other examples too (the use of Force Push with Anakin vs. Obi-Wan in ROTS, Dooku vs. Yoda in AOTC, Maul vs. Obi-Wan in TPM).
And I acknowledged my error perhaps three posts after that.

In any event, I don't think anyone has argued that they can't use offensive Force powers in combat, it is obvious they can. However, I don't think that such attacks are garuanteed to work every time, and can be negated or reflected, assuming the combatant in question senses it coming and can do something about it (case in point, Yoda v. Dooku).
The Rift
Stanislav Petrov- The man who saved the world
Hugh Thompson Jr.- A True American Hero
"In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope." - President Barack Obama
"May fortune favor you, for your goals are the goals of the world." - Ancient Chall valediction
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: nitpicking ahoy!

Post by Lord Revan »

Kurgan wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:to date the only Jedi to have defeated Vader is Luke Skywalker(as in the son of Anakin Skywalker) and it's quite clear that Luke is not just another jedi to Vader, from the EU I've read it's quite clear that Vader loses focus if confronted with things Anakin Skywalker cared about.
Obi-Wan defeated Vader in ROTS. Dooku defeated him in AOTC, but that was before he became Vader. Of course if you're arguing who's defeated him while in the suit then that's different. ;)
we were talking about about Darth Vader post-Mustafar as it was the topic of the thread.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Post by Kurgan »

Noble Ire wrote: And I acknowledged my error perhaps three posts after that.
My bad! ;) Though your next response suggested it was something rare. Out of all the saber battles we've seen in the movies four of them (classic trilogy) involve no offense force powers used mid-duel (unless you count Vader's tossing a lightsaber as a force power), while in the prequels five out of six of the battles we see (though one could argue how you break up those battles, since some of them overlap) involve the use of offensive force power, only one involving "force grip." Apparently push or lightning use is far more common.
In any event, I don't think anyone has argued that they can't use offensive Force powers in combat, it is obvious they can. However, I don't think that such attacks are garuanteed to work every time, and can be negated or reflected, assuming the combatant in question senses it coming and can do something about it (case in point, Yoda v. Dooku).
I wouldn't argue that it has to be guarenteed to work every time, only that it's a viable tactic that supposedly seasoned force users may employ.

Lord Revan, I stand corrected then.

Now who wants to argue that channeling the darkside is required for a Light Sider to win a saber duel against a Sith? ;)
fun/fantasy movies existed before the overrated Star Wars came out. What made it seem 'less dark' was the sheer goofy aspect of it: two robots modeled on Laurel & Hardy, and a smartass outlaw with bigfoot co-pilot and their hotrod pizza-shaped ship, and they were sucked aboard a giant Disco Ball. -adw1
Someone asked me yesterday if Dracula met Saruman and there was a fight, who would win. I just looked at this man. What an idiotic thing to say. I mean really, it was half-witted. - Christopher Lee

Image
JKA Server 2024
User avatar
Darth Yoshi
Metroid
Posts: 7342
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:00pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Darth Yoshi »

Only if you want to argue that Dooku beat Yoda. :P
Image
Fragment of the Lord of Nightmares, release thy heavenly retribution. Blade of cold, black nothingness: become my power, become my body. Together, let us walk the path of destruction and smash even the souls of the Gods! RAGNA BLADE!
Lore Monkey | the Pichu-master™
Secularism—since AD 80
Av: Elika; Prince of Persia
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Yoda beat Dooku and he definately didn't channel the Dark Side.
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
User avatar
Stuart Mackey
Drunken Kiwi Editor of the ASVS Press
Posts: 5946
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:28am
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Re: nitpicking ahoy!

Post by Stuart Mackey »

Kurgan wrote:
What?? All the Sith we've seen in the movies have used lightsabers. And not just to "humiliate Jedi" but to defend their own lives in combat!
Have you seen the movies? How many Jedi did he fight and when? And what happned to them?
Palpatine got to run the galaxy not by fighting 10 000 Jedi {or however many ther are},he got elected to the position by being a force assisted politician.
Via money Europe could become political in five years" "... the current communities should be completed by a Finance Common Market which would lead us to European economic unity. Only then would ... the mutual commitments make it fairly easy to produce the political union which is the goal"

Jean Omer Marie Gabriel Monnet
--------------
User avatar
Eframepilot
Jedi Master
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2002-09-05 03:35am

Post by Eframepilot »

Cos Dashit wrote:Yoda beat Dooku and he definately didn't channel the Dark Side.
Yoda caught Dooku's Force lightning and threw it back at him. Yoda may not have generated the dark side energy for the lightning, but he certainly channeled it.

At any rate, Yoda's own use of the Force to knock out the Imperial guards, hurl Sidious across the room and send the Senate pod spinning back at Sidious totally disproves his later statement that a Jedi uses the Force only for knowledge and defense, never for attack (or at least, it disproves the most straightforward interpretation).
User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Post by Cykeisme »

I understand that there's a disparity between the Sidious vs Yoda battle in the movie and the novel. In the novel, it seems like Yoda is totally outclassed, whereas in the movie the end of the fight appears to have been a matter of luck that could have gone either way.

However, this isn't necessarily an irreconcilable difference. Realize that there is no luck. Obi-Wan's statement in ANH can be taken as conjecture, but it may also be far more than that.

As I see it, this being my own interpretation, strength in the Force doesn't simply grant you the power to see the future and move objects or shoot lightning. It actually increases your potential to affect fate in your favor, or perhaps to simply have fate go in your favor. Those with a profound understanding of the Force realize there is no luck; it's the "will of the Force" at work.

From all measurable, observable data, Yoda's defeat may have been luck.. but from the point of view of the Force, Sidious simply could not have been defeated and destroyed there in the Senate Chamber.. and Yoda ultimately realized this.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
Cos Dashit
Jedi Knight
Posts: 659
Joined: 2006-01-30 03:29pm
Location: Skipping around the edge of an event horizon.

Post by Cos Dashit »

Would one fight determine which is more skilled with the Force?

Perhaps if Yoda didn't go into exile and tried fighting Palpatine again, there might have been different results. I would have laid low for a short while, concentrated, and gathered my thoughts so as to regain lost abilities and sharpen rusty skills.

I'm sure if Yoda did this, he could have beaten Sidious the second time 'round.
Please forgive any idiotic comments, stupid observations, or dumb questions in above post, for I am but a college student with little real world experience.
Post Reply