Midichlorian Counts
Posted: 2006-11-02 10:00pm
Is there a chart released or perhaps approved by Lucasfilms on the midichlorian counts of major Star Wars characters? I have a feeling SuperShadow's may not be that accurate...
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100064
I'd say that it's strongly implied that, at least in terms of midichlorian counts, Anakin > Yoda > any other Jedi.Cos Dashit wrote:Well what do we know from the films and trusted canon sources? It is stated directly in TPM that Anakin's > Yoda's. Is that all we can discern?
And what of the Sith?SCRawl wrote:I'd say that it's strongly implied that, at least in terms of midichlorian counts, Anakin > Yoda > any other Jedi.Cos Dashit wrote:Well what do we know from the films and trusted canon sources? It is stated directly in TPM that Anakin's > Yoda's. Is that all we can discern?
My guess is that they don't often show up for midichlorian screenings at the Jedi clinic.Cos Dashit wrote:And what of the Sith?SCRawl wrote:I'd say that it's strongly implied that, at least in terms of midichlorian counts, Anakin > Yoda > any other Jedi.Cos Dashit wrote:Well what do we know from the films and trusted canon sources? It is stated directly in TPM that Anakin's > Yoda's. Is that all we can discern?
Yeah, I'm getting the impression that you're using a source for your information that's pretty low in terms of official support. As the OP states, we're looking for something from Lucasfilms, and my understanding is that no such chart exists.Dark lord Revan2007 wrote:its funny, anakin beat the count for the emperor by like 5000. and the emperor wouldnt have been so powerful without the kysar dragon stone, so technically, from what i know, unless wrong, the emperor may be very weak without the stone.
Try to distinguish between real official sources and somebody's fanfic. I searched both Wookieepedia and the CUSWE, and I haven't found this "kysar dragon stone" of yours. If you got it from SuperShadow, realize that he's full of shit.Dark lord Revan2007 wrote:its funny, anakin beat the count for the emperor by like 5000. and the emperor wouldnt have been so powerful without the kysar dragon stone, so technically, from what i know, unless wrong, the emperor may be very weak without the stone.
Do you have a source for these at all? And what is a "kysar dragon stone"?Dark lord Revan2007 wrote:its funny, anakin beat the count for the emperor by like 5000. and the emperor wouldnt have been so powerful without the kysar dragon stone, so technically, from what i know, unless wrong, the emperor may be very weak without the stone.
Do keep in mind that Dark Lord at least heavily implies that Vader has the same potential as Anakin, and the difference in "strength" between the two incarnations is purely psychological.General Schatten wrote:Why whatever gave you that idea, the fact that Super Shadow lists Chewbacca as eligible for Jedi Training or the fact that he listed Anakin and Vader as having the same count despite being severely weakened.
This a poor dodge. So do you have anything other then speculation to counter Surlethe?General Schatten wrote:Psychological limitations do have that ability to manifest in physical limitations, as well.
Both viewpoints are not equally valid; one requires assuming that his psychological damage afflicted his potential capabilities, and the other does not and instead simply attributes his decrease in ability to his psychological problems.General Schatten wrote:It's not a counter, I'm actually agreeing in a way, basically Vader is like someone with a very limited self-esteem who doesn't try his hardest and therefore limits himself. Essentially, I'm saying both view points are equally valid, one just happens to be caused by the other.
First of all, we have no idea of the mechanism, if any, by which midichlorians make a person capable of using the Force. Secondly, if indeed it is the blood which important, Anakin's truncated body will have less blood -- and therefore fewer blood cells -- than before Obi-Wan's impromptu surgery.havokeff wrote:Also Vader and Anakin have the same blood, if not the same amounts. The Midi count is per cell, not per quart, IIRC.
Will this do?FTeik wrote:Bring on the Hutt-Jedi.