1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor
Moderator: Vympel
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor
Ok, we have one Eclipse and one Executor thats been dropped into a staged fight, they start out at 100 million km from each other, their respective mission is to kill the other one, hyperdrives may not be used to escape the fight.
- CmdrWilkens
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9093
- Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
- Location: Land of the Crabcake
- Contact:
Re: 1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor
IF the Eclipse can target the Executor with its SL then its endgame, otherwise the Executor closes range and uses its sueprior conventional firepower to eliminate the Eclipse.His Divine Shadow wrote:Ok, we have one Eclipse and one Executor thats been dropped into a staged fight, they start out at 100 million km from each other, their respective mission is to kill the other one, hyperdrives may not be used to escape the fight.
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
Re: 1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor
You rely on two assumptions, the firepower discrepency of the eclipses secondary weapons, and that the shield strenght difference is not large enough to matter, token calcs on reactor power would show this not to be so.CmdrWilkens wrote:IF the Eclipse can target the Executor with its SL then its endgame, otherwise the Executor closes range and uses its sueprior conventional firepower to eliminate the Eclipse.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
Eclipse, Unquestionably.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 637
- Joined: 2002-11-18 08:10pm
- Location: somewhere I don't want to be
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
Not according to some people, so hence the debate.
It seems to be true that the ESSD has weaker conventional weapons, about twice less powerfull than the Executors infact, but it packs grawell generators and more powerfull shields.
The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
The ESSD can pack a fullpower shot in ten minutes, that would represent a reactor power of around 1.5e24watts(Coreship reactor = 1e24w) to 6e26w(likely)
It seems to be true that the ESSD has weaker conventional weapons, about twice less powerfull than the Executors infact, but it packs grawell generators and more powerfull shields.
The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
The ESSD can pack a fullpower shot in ten minutes, that would represent a reactor power of around 1.5e24watts(Coreship reactor = 1e24w) to 6e26w(likely)
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
The Essential Guide to Vehicles indicates that shields are strong enough to ram enemy vehicles w/out losing a significant portion of their strength.His Divine Shadow wrote:The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
JADAFETWA
- Robert Treder
- has strong kung-fu.
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: 2002-07-03 02:38am
- Location: San Jose, CA
What size of enemy vehicles? I think that should go without saying, seeing as there's not much in the way of vehicles that are more massive than the Eclipse, barring a Death Star. The Executor shrugged off an Imperator-class ramming it while decelerating from hyperspace. So, even if the Eclipse only has equal shielding, it should more than allow for ramming other ships.IG-88E wrote:The Essential Guide to Vehicles indicates that shields are strong enough to ram enemy vehicles w/out losing a significant portion of their strength.His Divine Shadow wrote:The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
And you may ask yourself, 'Where does that highway go to?'
Brotherhood of the Monkey - First Monkey|Justice League - Daredevil|Late Knights of Conan O'Brien - Eisenhower Mug Knight (13 Conan Pts.)|SD.Net Chroniclers|HAB
Brotherhood of the Monkey - First Monkey|Justice League - Daredevil|Late Knights of Conan O'Brien - Eisenhower Mug Knight (13 Conan Pts.)|SD.Net Chroniclers|HAB
I believe the three Imperators ramming the Executor took down its shields.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- Wicked Pilot
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 8972
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Master of Ossus
- Darkest Knight
- Posts: 18213
- Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
- Location: California
It was referring to capital ships, which I took to be approximately equivalent to ISD's and Mon Calamari cruisers, but it also implied that the Eclipse could do so repeatedly.Robert Treder wrote:What size of enemy vehicles? I think that should go without saying, seeing as there's not much in the way of vehicles that are more massive than the Eclipse, barring a Death Star. The Executor shrugged off an Imperator-class ramming it while decelerating from hyperspace. So, even if the Eclipse only has equal shielding, it should more than allow for ramming other ships.IG-88E wrote:The Essential Guide to Vehicles indicates that shields are strong enough to ram enemy vehicles w/out losing a significant portion of their strength.His Divine Shadow wrote:The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
I honestly don't know. The Eclipse I is slightly smaller (17.5km) than the Executor (17.6km), has a superlaser, gravity well generators (unlike the Eclipse II)- but I don't know about conventional weapons or shield strength.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Re: 1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor
The Secondary firepower of an Eclipse is enough to trash the Excutor. An Executor is something like 30 times the size of an ISD yet can be threatened by less then half a dozen. The Eclipse has true firepower for its size.CmdrWilkens wrote:IF the Eclipse can target the Executor with its SL then its endgame, otherwise the Executor closes range and uses its sueprior conventional firepower to eliminate the Eclipse.His Divine Shadow wrote:Ok, we have one Eclipse and one Executor thats been dropped into a staged fight, they start out at 100 million km from each other, their respective mission is to kill the other one, hyperdrives may not be used to escape the fight.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Incorrect. The Eclipse is aproximately three times larger then the Executor. The Eclipse is slightly SHORTER then the Executor.Vympel wrote:I honestly don't know. The Eclipse I is slightly smaller (17.5km) than the Executor (17.6km), has a superlaser, gravity well generators (unlike the Eclipse II)- but I don't know about conventional weapons or shield strength.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
If/how fighters/gunships can help as well as surface area for gun mounts is important here.Alyeska wrote:Incorrect. The Eclipse is aproximately three times larger then the Executor. The Eclipse is slightly SHORTER then the Executor.Vympel wrote:I honestly don't know. The Eclipse I is slightly smaller (17.5km) than the Executor (17.6km), has a superlaser, gravity well generators (unlike the Eclipse II)- but I don't know about conventional weapons or shield strength.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
The Eclipse is far larger, and if anything its going to be more powerful ton for ton. Be it by superlaser or secondaries the Executor is doomed.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
I see, I tried to do the same thing, but i had only sketchy info to go on.nightmare wrote:WEG doesn't count for a lot as we know. But in any case, I added the stats together and got 17% more firepower for an Eclipse. Not counting the SL of course. Better fire control on the Eclipse, better sensors on the Executor.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
Good point, the Eclipse is far more massive yet shorter, but still, I don't buy the EU estimations of the Executor's weaponry- it's based on the 8km figure after all.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
I don't buy the WEG estimations on the Eclipses weaponry either.Vympel wrote:Good point, the Eclipse is far more massive yet shorter, but still, I don't buy the EU estimations of the Executor's weaponry- it's based on the 8km figure after all.
However I believe that there are two incidents that compare relatively well when regarding shield power, I believe that maybe 40 or so fighters attacked an Executor(who's name escape me) class and with 80 torps, 60 capship, 20 fighter, they where able to collapse the bow shields.
Now in Empires End there where over a hundred fighters attacking the Eclipse, sure it was just a feint, but it proves one important thing, that the odds where better in sending in the Falcon on the ESSD than taking those hundred or so fighters and giving them torps and attacking the Eclipse, heck, they should have been able to muster capital ships too, but apparently they didn't, this really speaks loads for the Eclipses shields.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
I doubt they'd even use their torpedoes and if they did they'd use low-yield, I don't think the NR would throw around valuable ammo at a time like that when it would be completely useless by the mission objective.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
- His Divine Shadow
- Commence Primary Ignition
- Posts: 12791
- Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
- Location: Finland, west coast
Objective was taking down the Eclipse, no?Illuminatus Primus wrote:I doubt they'd even use their torpedoes and if they did they'd use low-yield, I don't think the NR would throw around valuable ammo at a time like that when it would be completely useless by the mission objective.
Methods:
The Executor method, obviously not workable, and this would not have been costly, and throwing in a few mon cal ships would have sealed the deal and destroyed the most powerfull warship in the Imperial Navy.
No, I think that they did consider this tactic, to even bigger proportions, but decided that the Eclipses shields where so much more powerfull that such a tactic would have been a failure even with larger forces and capital ships involved.
Other method, smuggling in a strike team, this was apparently better even though we're pitting a few guys again 700.000 soldiers or so.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.