1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Whic one wins?

Eclipse
43
88%
Executor
6
12%
 
Total votes: 49

User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Ok, we have one Eclipse and one Executor thats been dropped into a staged fight, they start out at 100 million km from each other, their respective mission is to kill the other one, hyperdrives may not be used to escape the fight.
User avatar
CmdrWilkens
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9093
Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
Location: Land of the Crabcake
Contact:

Re: 1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor

Post by CmdrWilkens »

His Divine Shadow wrote:Ok, we have one Eclipse and one Executor thats been dropped into a staged fight, they start out at 100 million km from each other, their respective mission is to kill the other one, hyperdrives may not be used to escape the fight.
IF the Eclipse can target the Executor with its SL then its endgame, otherwise the Executor closes range and uses its sueprior conventional firepower to eliminate the Eclipse.
Image
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE

"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Re: 1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor

Post by His Divine Shadow »

CmdrWilkens wrote:IF the Eclipse can target the Executor with its SL then its endgame, otherwise the Executor closes range and uses its sueprior conventional firepower to eliminate the Eclipse.
You rely on two assumptions, the firepower discrepency of the eclipses secondary weapons, and that the shield strenght difference is not large enough to matter, token calcs on reactor power would show this not to be so.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Post by Kuja »

Um, yeah, Eclipse takes this.
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

Eclipse, Unquestionably.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
jaeger115
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 1222
Joined: 2002-12-29 04:39pm
Location: In the dark corridor, behind you

Post by jaeger115 »

WTF? I thought the Eclipse was FAR stronger than the Executor!
Concession accepted - COMMENCE PRIMARY IGNITION
Elite Warrior Monk of SD.net
BotM. Demolition Monkey
"I don't believe in God, any more than I believe in Mother Goose." - Clarence Darrow
HAB Special-Ops and Counter-Intelligence Agent
God Emperor
Jedi Knight
Posts: 637
Joined: 2002-11-18 08:10pm
Location: somewhere I don't want to be

Post by God Emperor »

Isn't this a little one sided?
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Not according to some people, so hence the debate.

It seems to be true that the ESSD has weaker conventional weapons, about twice less powerfull than the Executors infact, but it packs grawell generators and more powerfull shields.

The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.

The ESSD can pack a fullpower shot in ten minutes, that would represent a reactor power of around 1.5e24watts(Coreship reactor = 1e24w) to 6e26w(likely)
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

In a 1 on 1, it should be rather obvious which ship has the upper hand, even without the SL.

Without the SL, I would say 2 Executors can take the Eclipse. With, minimum 3, probably 4 to make it reasonably certain.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Post by Kuja »

His Divine Shadow wrote:The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
The Essential Guide to Vehicles indicates that shields are strong enough to ram enemy vehicles w/out losing a significant portion of their strength.
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
Robert Treder
has strong kung-fu.
Posts: 3891
Joined: 2002-07-03 02:38am
Location: San Jose, CA

Post by Robert Treder »

IG-88E wrote:
His Divine Shadow wrote:The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
The Essential Guide to Vehicles indicates that shields are strong enough to ram enemy vehicles w/out losing a significant portion of their strength.
What size of enemy vehicles? I think that should go without saying, seeing as there's not much in the way of vehicles that are more massive than the Eclipse, barring a Death Star. The Executor shrugged off an Imperator-class ramming it while decelerating from hyperspace. So, even if the Eclipse only has equal shielding, it should more than allow for ramming other ships.
And you may ask yourself, 'Where does that highway go to?'

Brotherhood of the Monkey - First Monkey|Justice League - Daredevil|Late Knights of Conan O'Brien - Eisenhower Mug Knight (13 Conan Pts.)|SD.Net Chroniclers|HAB
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

I believe the three Imperators ramming the Executor took down its shields.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

Volume wise the Eclipse is greater than the Executer. Assuming both ships carry the same firepower to volume ratio, which is a good assumption considering they are both KDY, the Eclipse should have the advantage.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Robert Treder wrote:
IG-88E wrote:
His Divine Shadow wrote:The wildcard is how much more powerfull the shields are, but if reactor power is any indicator of shield strenght, then the ESSD is painfully powerfull.
The Essential Guide to Vehicles indicates that shields are strong enough to ram enemy vehicles w/out losing a significant portion of their strength.
What size of enemy vehicles? I think that should go without saying, seeing as there's not much in the way of vehicles that are more massive than the Eclipse, barring a Death Star. The Executor shrugged off an Imperator-class ramming it while decelerating from hyperspace. So, even if the Eclipse only has equal shielding, it should more than allow for ramming other ships.
It was referring to capital ships, which I took to be approximately equivalent to ISD's and Mon Calamari cruisers, but it also implied that the Eclipse could do so repeatedly.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

I honestly don't know. The Eclipse I is slightly smaller (17.5km) than the Executor (17.6km), has a superlaser, gravity well generators (unlike the Eclipse II)- but I don't know about conventional weapons or shield strength.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: 1 Eclipse vs. 1 Executor

Post by Alyeska »

CmdrWilkens wrote:
His Divine Shadow wrote:Ok, we have one Eclipse and one Executor thats been dropped into a staged fight, they start out at 100 million km from each other, their respective mission is to kill the other one, hyperdrives may not be used to escape the fight.
IF the Eclipse can target the Executor with its SL then its endgame, otherwise the Executor closes range and uses its sueprior conventional firepower to eliminate the Eclipse.
The Secondary firepower of an Eclipse is enough to trash the Excutor. An Executor is something like 30 times the size of an ISD yet can be threatened by less then half a dozen. The Eclipse has true firepower for its size.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Vympel wrote:I honestly don't know. The Eclipse I is slightly smaller (17.5km) than the Executor (17.6km), has a superlaser, gravity well generators (unlike the Eclipse II)- but I don't know about conventional weapons or shield strength.
Incorrect. The Eclipse is aproximately three times larger then the Executor. The Eclipse is slightly SHORTER then the Executor.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Alyeska wrote:
Vympel wrote:I honestly don't know. The Eclipse I is slightly smaller (17.5km) than the Executor (17.6km), has a superlaser, gravity well generators (unlike the Eclipse II)- but I don't know about conventional weapons or shield strength.
Incorrect. The Eclipse is aproximately three times larger then the Executor. The Eclipse is slightly SHORTER then the Executor.
If/how fighters/gunships can help as well as surface area for gun mounts is important here.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

The Eclipse is far larger, and if anything its going to be more powerful ton for ton. Be it by superlaser or secondaries the Executor is doomed.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

WEG doesn't count for a lot as we know. But in any case, I added the stats together and got 17% more firepower for an Eclipse. Not counting the SL of course. Better fire control on the Eclipse, better sensors on the Executor.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

nightmare wrote:WEG doesn't count for a lot as we know. But in any case, I added the stats together and got 17% more firepower for an Eclipse. Not counting the SL of course. Better fire control on the Eclipse, better sensors on the Executor.
I see, I tried to do the same thing, but i had only sketchy info to go on.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Good point, the Eclipse is far more massive yet shorter, but still, I don't buy the EU estimations of the Executor's weaponry- it's based on the 8km figure after all.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Vympel wrote:Good point, the Eclipse is far more massive yet shorter, but still, I don't buy the EU estimations of the Executor's weaponry- it's based on the 8km figure after all.
I don't buy the WEG estimations on the Eclipses weaponry either.

However I believe that there are two incidents that compare relatively well when regarding shield power, I believe that maybe 40 or so fighters attacked an Executor(who's name escape me) class and with 80 torps, 60 capship, 20 fighter, they where able to collapse the bow shields.

Now in Empires End there where over a hundred fighters attacking the Eclipse, sure it was just a feint, but it proves one important thing, that the odds where better in sending in the Falcon on the ESSD than taking those hundred or so fighters and giving them torps and attacking the Eclipse, heck, they should have been able to muster capital ships too, but apparently they didn't, this really speaks loads for the Eclipses shields.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

I doubt they'd even use their torpedoes and if they did they'd use low-yield, I don't think the NR would throw around valuable ammo at a time like that when it would be completely useless by the mission objective.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
His Divine Shadow
Commence Primary Ignition
Posts: 12791
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:22am
Location: Finland, west coast

Post by His Divine Shadow »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:I doubt they'd even use their torpedoes and if they did they'd use low-yield, I don't think the NR would throw around valuable ammo at a time like that when it would be completely useless by the mission objective.
Objective was taking down the Eclipse, no?

Methods:
The Executor method, obviously not workable, and this would not have been costly, and throwing in a few mon cal ships would have sealed the deal and destroyed the most powerfull warship in the Imperial Navy.

No, I think that they did consider this tactic, to even bigger proportions, but decided that the Eclipses shields where so much more powerfull that such a tactic would have been a failure even with larger forces and capital ships involved.

Other method, smuggling in a strike team, this was apparently better even though we're pitting a few guys again 700.000 soldiers or so.
Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who did not.
Post Reply