ISD Question

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
consequences
Homicidal Maniac
Posts: 6964
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:06pm

ISD Question

Post by consequences »

Does anyone have the actual volume of the main reactor on the underside of the ISD? Also, does anyone know the precise dimensions of the unnecesarily huge hangar bay?
Image
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

Power generator

Rough estimations, taken from the original ICS:

-The Star Destroyer in the picture is, roughly, 17" long. The power generator is roughly a cylinder with rounded ends. It is roughly 4" long and has a diameter of about 2". This gives it a length of 375 meters and a diameter of 188 meters. Then there are the backup engin reactors and the subsidiary reactors, both which have a diameter of slightly less than 1" (94 meters). Plus, there are several smaller 1/8" (11-12 meters) reactors strewn about the ship, such as an auxilliary reactor for the tractor beams.

Being lazy (I AM really lazy, you know), I just calculated the reactor size of the ISD as if it were a perfect cylinder, rather than having rounded edges (remember, I'm lazy). The numbers above give 10409667 cubic meters for the total volume of the ISD's main reactor... and, remember, this is a bit too high. The smaller (94 meter) reactors have a volume of 434892 cubic meters. The smallest auxilliary reactors have a volume of 5575 cubic meters.

Hangar bay

According to the ICS drawing, it has a length of 1 3/4", or 164 meters. This is barely enough to hold a 150 meter Corellian Corvette, so I fail to see how you can call it "unnecessarily huge". It also has a width of approximately 2" (188 meters) and creates a 1/2" impression (47 meters) into the ship's main hull at the centerline (at the edges, due to the ISD's angled hull, this impression is about half that, but a precise measurement can't be garnered from the ICS).
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
SPOOFE
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3174
Joined: 2002-07-03 07:34pm
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Contact:

Post by SPOOFE »

And, remember, since I'm lazy, I just plugged numbers into Abe's Volume Calculator (http://grapevine.abe.msstate.edu/~fto/t ... index.html) and rounded down to the nearest 1.
The Great and Malignant
User avatar
nightmare
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1539
Joined: 2002-07-26 11:07am
Location: Here. Sometimes there.

Post by nightmare »

Unnecesarily huge hangar bay?

Maybe, if you assume TIE should be packed like sardines. If you assume it looks anything like the rebel hangars we have seen, with refuelling, reapirs etc. going on, the picture looks different. Do the numbers now that you have the size of it. I did.
Star Trek vs. Star Wars, Extralife style.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

The TIEs are stored in racks adjacent to the hangar bay.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
consequences
Homicidal Maniac
Posts: 6964
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:06pm

Post by consequences »

The idea of taking a ship into your own ship is pretty silly to me, it means your enemy can sacrifice a corvette to kill a Star Destroyer if he can convince you to capture one, and not use any Ion cannons, kind of like what we saw in ANH. Its too big, because we saw them take the corvette in without adjusting hangar space at all, which means there is a giant empty volume in a ship that is supposed to engage in combat. That's pretty silly, and a near fatal flaw if facing an opponent of equivalent volume that doesn't waste that much space.
Thanks for the info though.
Image
User avatar
meNNis
Padawan Learner
Posts: 269
Joined: 2002-10-31 11:34am
Location: Pismo Beach, Cali
Contact:

Post by meNNis »

consequences wrote:The idea of taking a ship into your own ship is pretty silly to me, it means your enemy can sacrifice a corvette to kill a Star Destroyer if he can convince you to capture one, and not use any Ion cannons, kind of like what we saw in ANH. Its too big, because we saw them take the corvette in without adjusting hangar space at all, which means there is a giant empty volume in a ship that is supposed to engage in combat. That's pretty silly, and a near fatal flaw if facing an opponent of equivalent volume that doesn't waste that much space.
Thanks for the info though.
well damn youre pretty silly yerself then sounds to me buddy!

ships do need to be repaired sometimes, y'know. among other things.
<middle finger> Fuck political correctness </middle finger>

"Most people are of average intelligence." ~ Wicked Pilot (I happen to disagree)

Anti-PETA / Anti-Facist League

PROUD to be a Libertarian-American-Warmongering-Warsie-Asshole, Thank you.
consequences
Homicidal Maniac
Posts: 6964
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:06pm

Post by consequences »

That's what Deepdocks were made for.
And I resent the implication that I am 'pretty silly' I am nothing less than ridiculous, and I will thank you not to forget it.
Image
Post Reply