Second Star Wars Gangsta Rap by Bentframe
Posted: 2007-07-20 12:56pm
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=111313
You have then? Sorry, this if the first time I saw it, I saw the original one and i never knew about the other ones.General Schatten wrote:Old... Heard it last year around this time.
what is wrong with it?DesertFly wrote:This one's retarded. It has nothing on the first.
Whereas the first had a sense of fun about it, this version has the obnoxious, crude, "in-your-face-yo" manner that makes most rap extremely distasteful in my eyes. The original managed avoid the typical overusage of profanity and crass sexuality, and was, quite simply, funnier.Warsie wrote:what is wrong with it?DesertFly wrote:This one's retarded. It has nothing on the first.
Exactly. To elaborate, the original had a fun, fresh look at the GFFA through a "gangsta" perspective; all the characters seemed real, and true to their movie likenesses. On the other hand, this one seemed like every other generic, run-of-the-mill thugish rap, with crude, pointless sexual lyrics and too much of a sense of self-importance.Noble Ire wrote:Whereas the first had a sense of fun about it, this version has the obnoxious, crude, "in-your-face-yo" manner that makes most rap extremely distasteful in my eyes. The original managed avoid the typical overusage of profanity and crass sexuality, and was, quite simply, funnier.Warsie wrote:what is wrong with it?
All i'm going to say is what the hell did i JUST watch. The 2nd gangsta rap is just to far over the top and i have to say i didnt like it all all. I can see why 3PO was gay but why was Chiewie made gay?Noble Ire wrote:Whereas the first had a sense of fun about it, this version has the obnoxious, crude, "in-your-face-yo" manner that makes most rap extremely distasteful in my eyes. The original managed avoid the typical overusage of profanity and crass sexuality, and was, quite simply, funnier.Warsie wrote:what is wrong with it?DesertFly wrote:This one's retarded. It has nothing on the first.