Page 1 of 2

ISD Destroyed by Asteroid.

Posted: 2003-01-30 12:21pm
by smokemare
What is the most current established reason taht the ISD in ESB gets vaped by an Asteroid ? Anyone know ? Were it's shields supposed to be down or something ?

Posted: 2003-01-30 12:23pm
by Darth Wong
It didn't get vaped. It suffered damage to its bridge tower. The captain was still standing for a few seconds after the explosion.

Posted: 2003-01-30 12:30pm
by jegs2
Darth Wong wrote:It didn't get vaped. It suffered damage to its bridge tower. The captain was still standing for a few seconds after the explosion.
Mike, do you have any screenshots for that? I always thought the bridge was taken out...

Posted: 2003-01-30 12:38pm
by Darth Wong
jegs2 wrote:Mike, do you have any screenshots for that? I always thought the bridge was taken out...
Sure!
Image
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Empire/Hat ... teroid.jpg

This is a shot taken approximately 2 seconds after the impact. The captain is still standing, and then recoils from one of several bright flashes. He probably dies after this from depressurization or other problems associated with the damage, but he obviously couldn't be standing there if the whole bridge tower was gone.

Posted: 2003-01-30 12:38pm
by Coaan
jegs2 wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:It didn't get vaped. It suffered damage to its bridge tower. The captain was still standing for a few seconds after the explosion.
Mike, do you have any screenshots for that? I always thought the bridge was taken out...
The Bridge was totally vaped...you get a two or three second look at it before it switches to Vader's reception room..(I think.)

Posted: 2003-01-30 12:39pm
by Coaan
Lack of an edit button....Gr.

Either way it wouldn't matter if the bridge was taken down, the auxiluary bridge would then assume command as it is always kept crewed with their best, the Isd would have still been operational...just deformed

Posted: 2003-01-30 12:44pm
by Phil Skayhan
Something I never noticed before:

At about 2.8 sec on the left side of the explosion, I think I see what looks like an electrical arc.

Or am I seeing things?

Posted: 2003-01-30 01:01pm
by jegs2
btw, shouldn't this be in Pure Star Wars?

Posted: 2003-01-30 02:33pm
by Darth Servo
I think it would be best to take a screen shot of the ISD before the asteroid hits and make an outline of the bridge tower.

Then take a screen shot after the asteroid hits and super impose the outline of the bridge tower on it to prove that the tower was in fact totally obscured by asteroid debris.

Posted: 2003-01-30 02:40pm
by Rightous Fist Of Heaven
According to the ICS, holonet transmissions cannot be sent thru shields, the captain of the ship which's bridge SUPPOSEDLY got vaped was in a holoconference with Vader.

Posted: 2003-01-30 03:44pm
by CmdrWilkens
Also the bridge tower itself is still intact for the most part. The outline is still visible moving against the background of the Executor.

Basically it happens like this:

1) Asteriod impacts
2) Massive bang as it runs into the hull and destroys itself (possibly with the help of hull level shielding)
3) A cascade failure causes some sort of problem in the holonet transmitter
4) This porblem, or a related failure, simultaneously creates a situation which causes the ship's Captain to recoil in fear
5) Transmission is lost and the ship, still intact, keeps on truckin.

Posted: 2003-01-30 05:02pm
by Grand Admiral Thrawn
You've been bullshitted. http://supreme_sheridan.tripod.com/aotc_ics_vs_tesb.html

Posted: 2003-01-30 05:31pm
by His Divine Shadow
Coaan wrote:The Bridge was totally vaped...you get a two or three second look at it before it switches to Vader's reception room..(I think.)
Wrong, as we still see the captain standing, and we still see the outline of the tower against the Executors engines and the explosion is consistant with an impactor that failed to penetrate the armor of the tower and exploded against it.

Posted: 2003-01-30 05:31pm
by His Divine Shadow
The only thing we can actually get from this scene is that the comm systems where affected, anything else is speculation

Posted: 2003-01-30 11:04pm
by Connor MacLeod
Don't forget they couldn't operate shields during either holonet or subspace transmissions, and they didn't use conventional comm because it interfered with sensors and would have hampered the Falcon search.(stated in Galaxy Guide 3 - they used TIE shuttles to courier most of their message traffic).

Subspace comm can't operate when shields are active - stated in HttE.

Hyperwave/Holonet comm can't operate when shields are active - AoTC ICS.

Its also established in the SWE under the "holonet" entry that the TESB asteroid incident involved holonet transmissions, thus shields were down (which includes ray shields, particle shields, ands the "hull reinforcement" aspect of the particle shield.)

Posted: 2003-01-31 01:22am
by KhyronTheBackstabber
I've never been able to figure out why people think that ISD got destroyed. We only ever see three ISD, in the movie, no more. Vader was only talking to three captains. When the Falcon is piggy backing the IDS, and Han says "The fleets breaking up." We see two IDSs, and both have their bridge still in tacked. And we know the one the Falcon is attached to wasn't the one hit.

This type of thing makes me wonder if these people are watching a different version of the movie that no one else saw.

Posted: 2003-01-31 01:28am
by Crayz9000
I really need a "Thread Moved" picture.

Posted: 2003-01-31 01:48am
by Crayz9000
OK, here we go...

Image

Posted: 2003-01-31 02:10am
by Spanky The Dolphin
I'd say that the tower had to at least be severly damaged.

And at least enough to make the bridge out of commision before switching to the back up bridge.

Posted: 2003-01-31 02:12am
by Robert Treder
Crayz9000 wrote:OK, here we go...

[Sikorsky SkyCrane]
lol; I like it.

IIRC, the bridge tower isn't shown as being gone, only as being hit, and the shot changes before while the explosion is still there. I may be mistaken, though. I'll have to watch the scene again, obviously.

Posted: 2003-01-31 02:13am
by His Divine Shadow
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I'd say that the tower had to at least be severly damaged.

And at least enough to make the bridge out of commision before switching to the back up bridge.
Why? There was no sign of damage.

Posted: 2003-01-31 04:53am
by SPOOFE
Why? There was no sign of damage.
Aside from the loss of communications. At worst, the asteroid impat shorted a wire on the ISD bridge tower.

Posted: 2003-01-31 05:06am
by Spanky The Dolphin
His Divine Shadow wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I'd say that the tower had to at least be severly damaged.

And at least enough to make the bridge out of commision before switching to the back up bridge.
Why? There was no sign of damage.
IIRC, all we could see through the explosion was the outline of the sections not hit by the asteroid. If I'm wrong about this, please correct me.

EDIT: From looking at GAT's clip, I think that is pretty much all we see.

For all we know a third of the tower could have been taken out. The damage could vary from causing minor damage and a disruption on the bridge, to major damage with the bridge totally destroyed, making the ship dead in the water until command could be transfered to the backup bridge.

Posted: 2003-01-31 05:08am
by Connor MacLeod
KhyronTheBackstabber wrote:I've never been able to figure out why people think that ISD got destroyed. We only ever see three ISD, in the movie, no more. Vader was only talking to three captains. When the Falcon is piggy backing the IDS, and Han says "The fleets breaking up." We see two IDSs, and both have their bridge still in tacked. And we know the one the Falcon is attached to wasn't the one hit.

This type of thing makes me wonder if these people are watching a different version of the movie that no one else saw.
Partly because o fthe novelization.

Wayne Poe has a m ost excellent commentary on this common fallacy that Anti-Wars fanatics employ that goes into this in detail. I suggest anyone who faces this keep that site linked and consult it for all the proof one needs :)

Posted: 2003-01-31 05:10am
by Connor MacLeod
Mike has also brought up the point that, with the shields down, even if the asteroid destroyed the tower, we have no reason to assume this applies to the rest of the ship (his analogy, IIRC, is that carrier towers tend not to be heavily armored, etc.)

This aspect is covered in his "shield technology" page - many of the "asteroid wank" fanboys who cite the asteroid field scene never have any concept of what momentum is :D