Is this website correct?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
jegs2
Imperial Spook
Posts: 4782
Joined: 2002-08-22 06:23pm
Location: Alabama

Is this website correct?

Post by jegs2 »

Is this correct for a SSD?
http://www.galacticempiredatabank.com/SSD.html

Comment.
John 3:16-18
Warwolves G2
The University of North Alabama Lions!
User avatar
Typhonis 1
Rabid Monkey Scientist
Posts: 5791
Joined: 2002-07-06 12:07am
Location: deep within a secret cloning lab hidden in the brotherhood of the monkey thread

Post by Typhonis 1 »

First the name is wrong it would be Executor class star destroyer and as for cost they were building aproximatekly 2000 Star Destroyers a YEAR they would have no trouble building more and as for cost In secret the managed to build 60% of a second much larger Death Star in a few months
Brotherhood of the Bear Monkey Clonemaster , Anti Care Bears League,
Bureaucrat and BOFH of the HAB,
Skunk Works director of the Mecha Maniacs,
Black Mage,

I AM BACK! let the SCIENCE commence!
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

He's also using the new official length for of 12,800 meters, as well as the WEG stats derived from the ship's original understated length of 8,000 meters.
vakundok
Jedi Knight
Posts: 748
Joined: 2003-01-03 06:03pm
Location: in a country far far away

Post by vakundok »

New official lenght? They simply counted the average of the nonsense WEG 8000 and the most likely 17600 ... :(
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Post by Jim Raynor »

Yeah, I know. What pisses me off is that while the first incorrect length might have been the result of an honest mistake or sloppy research, they KNOW what they're doing this time and are incorrectly stating the Executor's length intentionally. They simply can't admit to having been wrong.
Post Reply