Destruction of Yavin?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Kythnos
Youngling
Posts: 143
Joined: 2008-12-05 10:19pm

Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Kythnos »

I encountered this amusing clip about Episode IV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzoeEdW-EDQ

Which got me thinking would have the destruction of Yavin have guaranteed the end of the rebels on Yavin 4?
Now I understand that the Deathstar might not have been able to blow up Gas Giant, which has a mass many times, possible hundreds of times greater than an earth size planet, depending on what type of Giant it is.
And Keeping the Deathstars limit of firing only once every 24 hours or so, which the clip removed for humor sake.

I have in my own mind what would happen but I was wondering what everyone else thought.
There's a great difference between potential and developed power. The one is clearly visible and can be awe-inspiring. The other may take a demigod to recognize.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Darth Wong »

Remember that the Death Star put about a million times more energy into Alderaan than it needed in order to destroy it. It would have worked, had Tarkin thought of it.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Connor MacLeod »

We dont know for sure how many "max power" shots the DS would be capable of though as a rule (And still be able to move about, travel through hyperspace, etc.) For all we know the DS may have stranded itself by needing to destroy the moon and gas giant both.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1750
Joined: 2008-10-10 11:52am
Location: Blighty

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Captain Seafort »

It may not have needed to destroy both - just shoot Yavin itself and let the debris from the explosion destroy the baseon Yavin IV. Any survivors could be mopped up by TIEs and other support ships.
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Yeah but the expansion would've been slow, perhaps slow enough to allow evacuation. And the energy density of the debris field might not be catastrophic for some time, considering the shielding capacity of SW starships.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Captain Seafort
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1750
Joined: 2008-10-10 11:52am
Location: Blighty

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Captain Seafort »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:Yeah but the expansion would've been slow, perhaps slow enough to allow evacuation. And the energy density of the debris field might not be catastrophic for some time, considering the shielding capacity of SW starships.
A few rough calculations gives the intensity of the blast at Yavin IV's orbit (1.62 million km) as about 3 exajoules/square metre. The total energy to strike the moon would, therefore, be 4E32 J. Unless the moon had a planetary shield, it's not going to survive that.

The speed of the explosion, however, works out to about 100km/s, meaning it would take more than two hours to reach the moon. Regardless of whether that was long enough for the Rebels to evacuate or not, it's four times as long as the Death Star would have taken to orbit the planet to get with firing range, so consider the point conceded.
User avatar
Teleros
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1544
Joined: 2006-03-31 02:11pm
Location: Ultra Prime, Klovia
Contact:

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Teleros »

Even better then, try encircling the Rebellion - Star Destroyers on one side, and the Death Star blowing Yavin IV to pieces on the other. The Death Star survives unless Luke et al manage to destroy it anyway (would Han & Chewie have survived to intervene?), and the Rebels have 2 hours to evacuate past the Imperial Navy.
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Samuel »

Teleros wrote:Even better then, try encircling the Rebellion - Star Destroyers on one side, and the Death Star blowing Yavin IV to pieces on the other. The Death Star survives unless Luke et al manage to destroy it anyway (would Han & Chewie have survived to intervene?), and the Rebels have 2 hours to evacuate past the Imperial Navy.
But then Tarkin has to share credit with the rest of the Imperial Fleet instead of single-handedly dealing the Rebellion a crushing blow and showing the worth of the Death Star as an independent vessel.
User avatar
Teleros
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1544
Joined: 2006-03-31 02:11pm
Location: Ultra Prime, Klovia
Contact:

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Teleros »

Only if he's incapable of playing politics competently: I'd be surprised if he couldn't downplay the role of any Imperial Navy units assigned to "mop up" the remains of the Rebel Alliance. And he could do it too, because any smart Imperial Navy commanders will have realised that, had the Death Star emerged within range of the moon immediately then their ships wouldn't have been needed at all.
lord Martiya
Jedi Master
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2007-08-29 11:52am

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by lord Martiya »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Illuminatus Primus wrote:Yeah but the expansion would've been slow, perhaps slow enough to allow evacuation. And the energy density of the debris field might not be catastrophic for some time, considering the shielding capacity of SW starships.
A few rough calculations gives the intensity of the blast at Yavin IV's orbit (1.62 million km) as about 3 exajoules/square metre. The total energy to strike the moon would, therefore, be 4E32 J. Unless the moon had a planetary shield, it's not going to survive that.

The speed of the explosion, however, works out to about 100km/s, meaning it would take more than two hours to reach the moon. Regardless of whether that was long enough for the Rebels to evacuate or not, it's four times as long as the Death Star would have taken to orbit the planet to get with firing range, so consider the point conceded.
Uh, but what about the gravitational issues? The destruction of the gas giant would gravitationally affect its moons, I suppose...
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Sarevok »

I thought the Imperials could just bring in a strike force of a few ISDs and other capships. That's all it takes to pulverize any living thing in the entire Yavin star system. The whole point of using the Death Star was a publicity stunt. In real world some people called for nuclear strikes against terrorists. In the fictional world of Star Wars the Imperials actually did go the extra length and did something equivalent by using a planet destroyer to fight pitiful band of interstellar insurgents. Actual combat effectiveness was not probably a concern when the order to use the Death Star came.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Serafina »

Well, not if Yavin had a planetary shield - those are known to be able to withstand weeks of Star Destroyer bombardment.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Ender »

Yavin Base had a full suite of defenses powered by equipment stolen off (IIRC) and ISD. OT ITW says it was able to hold off a large battleship that way.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by VT-16 »

Yavin's defenses were powered by an ISD's reactor equipment, Echo Base's defenses by a Praetor's reactor equipment. With the difference in power that entailed.
Last edited by VT-16 on 2009-01-28 09:02am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Wyrm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2206
Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Wyrm »

lord Martiya wrote:Uh, but what about the gravitational issues? The destruction of the gas giant would gravitationally affect its moons, I suppose...
Not until the expanding sphere of debris crosses Yavin IV's orbit (assuming near-spherical expansion—shell theorem again), and by then, the moon's toast.
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. 8)"
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."

Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10408
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Solauren »

Even blowing up Yavin isn't required.

After all, why blow up the moon when you can, once you are at the right angle, just shot through a few thousand kilometers of upper atmosphere and hit the moon?

Sure, you might not hit it at full power, but when dealing with Death Star level firepower, I don't think that really matters.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Kurgan »

Couldn't the Death Star just get close enough to the moon to slag the surface with its turbolaser batteries?

Of course I don't know what defenses the moon has on its surface, but still, that should deal a lot of damage, right?

I mean, if we're assuming a single ISD can BDZ a planet...
fun/fantasy movies existed before the overrated Star Wars came out. What made it seem 'less dark' was the sheer goofy aspect of it: two robots modeled on Laurel & Hardy, and a smartass outlaw with bigfoot co-pilot and their hotrod pizza-shaped ship, and they were sucked aboard a giant Disco Ball. -adw1
Someone asked me yesterday if Dracula met Saruman and there was a fight, who would win. I just looked at this man. What an idiotic thing to say. I mean really, it was half-witted. - Christopher Lee

Image
JKA Server 2024
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Kurgan wrote:Couldn't the Death Star just get close enough to the moon to slag the surface with its turbolaser batteries?

Of course I don't know what defenses the moon has on its surface, but still, that should deal a lot of damage, right?

I mean, if we're assuming a single ISD can BDZ a planet...
Really ANH would've made more sense if Yavin IV had a planetary shield. In any case, we know it had at least a local shield capable of holding off a large battleship like an Executor.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Lord Relvenous
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1501
Joined: 2007-02-11 10:55pm
Location: Idaho

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Lord Relvenous »

Kurgan wrote:Couldn't the Death Star just get close enough to the moon to slag the surface with its turbolaser batteries?

Of course I don't know what defenses the moon has on its surface, but still, that should deal a lot of damage, right?

I mean, if we're assuming a single ISD can BDZ a planet...
Whats the benefit of this? The discussion in this thread seems to be how the Death Star could have eliminated the Rebel base on Yavin IV in a quicker fashion. It would still have to round Yavin to have LOS to the moon, thus necessitating the same amount of orbit time. Also, the Rebel base did have some defenses, as mentioned above, which would allow it to withstand the bombardment for an indeterminate amount of time. While not likely to be a significant amount of time, it still allows the Rebels at least the same amount of time for evacuation or other activities as a shot from the superlaser would.

Also, Tarkin would be denied the grand statement that the destruction of the Rebel base with the Death Star would have been.
Coyote: Warm it in the microwave first to avoid that 'necrophelia' effect.
User avatar
Darth Raptor
Red Mage
Posts: 5448
Joined: 2003-12-18 03:39am

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Darth Raptor »

Teleros wrote:Only if he's incapable of playing politics competently: I'd be surprised if he couldn't downplay the role of any Imperial Navy units assigned to "mop up" the remains of the Rebel Alliance. And he could do it too, because any smart Imperial Navy commanders will have realised that, had the Death Star emerged within range of the moon immediately then their ships wouldn't have been needed at all.
Fuck that, just scrambling an adequate number of the Death Star's fighter compliment would have made all the difference. But better to have it sunk with all hands than acknowledge that maybe, just MAYBE it might have a relatively minor and easily-corrected-for weakness, eh?
Kurgan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4069
Joined: 2002-08-19 08:13pm

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Kurgan »

Good point, just come out of lightspeed in range of the moon to begin with... duh!
Whats the benefit of this? The discussion in this thread seems to be how the Death Star could have eliminated the Rebel base on Yavin IV in a quicker fashion. It would still have to round Yavin to have LOS to the moon, thus necessitating the same amount of orbit time.
No, I'm imagining a scenario where it uses the Superlaser to destroy the planet Yavin, fly through the debris straight to the moon, and slag the surface with its own turbolasers (and the fighter/ship complement of the station can help too I suppose and prevent the rebels from escaping).

What's wrong with that?
Also, the Rebel base did have some defenses, as mentioned above, which would allow it to withstand the bombardment for an indeterminate amount of time.
Presuming it's as strong as the Hoth shield, but then we have the same problem as with the Hoth scenario. What happens if we turn the crust around the shield into magma?

Can they fly away with the shield still up? Are there any "ion cannons" under the shield strong enough to fend off the DEATH STAR?
While not likely to be a significant amount of time, it still allows the Rebels at least the same amount of time for evacuation or other activities as a shot from the superlaser would.
They get less time to evacuate in my scenario than they would during the movie's scenario, unless they lower the shield and run sometime before the DS gets within turbolaser range (and the ship complement don't stop them).
Also, Tarkin would be denied the grand statement that the destruction of the Rebel base with the Death Star would have been.
Yeah, but who cares about that? This is an alternative scenario for destroying the Rebel base with their known assets and abilities at the time. So Vader pulls rank (or secretly drops something in Tarkin's coffee earlier) and takes over the station, and the other guys go along with it.


Though I laugh to think of another alternative scenario, in which Vader takes a page from genocidal maniac Yoda (TM) in "Star Wars Infinities: A New Hope" and just rams the station into the planet itself (after blowing away Yavin and flying through the debris field of course). Is that shield going to repel a 160 km metal projectile? If it could, just smash right next to it, goodbye Rebel base! (and Vader can bail out in his fighter before the final crash if he doesn't want to die)

Oh, did he just lose the Death Star in the process of eliminating the Rebels once and for all? Well blame it on Tarkin! They can just build another one, unopposed. ;)
fun/fantasy movies existed before the overrated Star Wars came out. What made it seem 'less dark' was the sheer goofy aspect of it: two robots modeled on Laurel & Hardy, and a smartass outlaw with bigfoot co-pilot and their hotrod pizza-shaped ship, and they were sucked aboard a giant Disco Ball. -adw1
Someone asked me yesterday if Dracula met Saruman and there was a fight, who would win. I just looked at this man. What an idiotic thing to say. I mean really, it was half-witted. - Christopher Lee

Image
JKA Server 2024
User avatar
Lord Relvenous
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1501
Joined: 2007-02-11 10:55pm
Location: Idaho

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by Lord Relvenous »

Your post didn't amke it immediately evident that you were talking about slagging the moon with the turbolasers after destroying Yavin. If you read my post again, I refer to still having to take the time to orbit Yavin.

In the case of destroying Yavin first, yes it would work to use the turbolasers on the base or surrounding area. It would just take a little while longer to destroy the base, as it would take a while to melt the crust, and most likely (depending on the Death Star's armament) longer to bring down the shields.

Note: Is the number of turbolasers on one hemisphere ever given?
Coyote: Warm it in the microwave first to avoid that 'necrophelia' effect.
bilateralrope
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6208
Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: Destruction of Yavin?

Post by bilateralrope »

Which side of Yavin IV was the rebel base on when the Death Star came round Yavin ?

The side facing the Death Star, or the other side of the moon ?

If it was on the other side, would the extra time required to get the Death Star in position to start shooting the rebel base be enough time for an evacuation ?
Post Reply