Questions, questions....

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Questions, questions....

Post by Frank Hipper »

1) If my hazy memory serves, Boba Fett's armor was described way back in the day as being Clone Wars surplus. Was this ever addressed before AoTC?
2) When was the Victory class cruiser renamed the Victory class star destroyer?
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
God Emperor
Jedi Knight
Posts: 637
Joined: 2002-11-18 08:10pm
Location: somewhere I don't want to be

Post by God Emperor »

For the second, I think they made the change because of how it sounds.
Whats more threating: Cruiser or Destroyer.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

1) If my hazy memory serves, Boba Fett's armor was described way back in the day as being Clone Wars surplus. Was this ever addressed before AoTC?
It's been brought up in the EU a number of times. Essentially it (and by extension Jango's) are Mandalorian Commandos armor. Pre-Clone Wars equipment.
2) When was the Victory class cruiser renamed the Victory class star destroyer?
Probably in some sort of redesignation program as the Empire introduced larger designs. In the more militarized Empire they were nothing more than destroyers, and low end ones at that, where as they were much more impressive in the Republican Navy.
Image
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Reason for the Victory question was that in an illustrated guide I glanced through at a bookstore years ago, what appears to be the same ship was called a cruiser, yet now is referred to as a star destroyer. That and I thought that those might be the type of ship pursuing the Millenium Falcon after blasting out of Mos Eisley. They are of similar appearance to the ISD.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

Question, the landing ships used by the Republic in AotC, were they Victory type 1 SDs?
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

Frank Hipper wrote:Reason for the Victory question was that in an illustrated guide I glanced through at a bookstore years ago, what appears to be the same ship was called a cruiser, yet now is referred to as a star destroyer.
Again,

In universe: they were once cruisers. But with the introduction of larger more powerful ships they were bumped down.

In real life: Sloppy writers
Frank Hipper wrote:That and I thought that those might be the type of ship pursuing the Millenium Falcon after blasting out of Mos Eisley. They are of similar appearance to the ISD.
Those are ISDs that pursue the Falcon. What makes you think they weren't?
Admiral Johnason wrote:Question, the landing ships used by the Republic in AotC, were they Victory type 1 SDs?
DUMBASS! Those are Acclamator-class troop transports. At least try to do the most basic research. That really is something you should know.
Image
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Stormbringer wrote:Those are ISDs that pursue the Falcon. What makes you think they weren't?
Didn't Han Solo call them cruisers? I know they were ISDs, at least ISD models, but the similarity in design, and the old cruiser designation, coupled with the dialogue...
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

Frank Hipper wrote:
Stormbringer wrote:Those are ISDs that pursue the Falcon. What makes you think they weren't?
Didn't Han Solo call them cruisers? I know they were ISDs, at least ISD models, but the similarity in design, and the old cruiser designation, coupled with the dialogue...
No, those were ISDs. Han just called them by the wrong name if he did call them cruisers. They're definetely ISDs. Mark 1s in fact.
Image
User avatar
Admiral Johnason
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2552
Joined: 2003-01-11 05:06pm
Location: The Rebel cruiser Defender

Post by Admiral Johnason »

Lucas said that he renamed the ships star destroyers for Empire.
Liberals for Nixon in 3000: Nixon... with carisma and a shiny robot body.

never negoiate out of fear, but never fear to negoiate.

Captian America- Justice League

HAB submarine commander-
"We'll break you of your fear of water."
Post Reply