Palpatine's crimes

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12236
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Palpatine's crimes

Post by Lord Revan »

While it's obvious no-one did put Palpatine to trial over the crimes he commited during his rise to power and as the Emperor, I was wondering what crimes (as we would see them) did Palpatine commit.

the few I can think of, from the top of my head would be
  • manufacturing the Naboo incident for political reasons (aka to allow him to elected Chancellor)
  • causing the Clone Wars and all the attrocities both the CIS and Republic did during the Clone Wars due being the mastermind behind both sides
  • Unjust enprisonment of unknown number of sentients (aka political prisoners not directly involved with the rebellion)
  • Slavery of unknown number of sentients for various reasons
  • destruction of Alderaan (indirectly)
while this list alone would probably put Palpatine in prison until the universe ends, there's probably quite a lot I've missed.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Esquire
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1583
Joined: 2011-11-16 11:20pm

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Esquire »

The actual charges would be tricky. Is behind-the-scenes manipulation actually illegal? Probably not, and what did he really do? As a private citizen, convince the Trade Federation to blockade Naboo - scummy, but likely to be technically legal. Ride the sympathy from that incident to head of the government, again not illegal. Between Naboo and the end of the Clone Wars there might be something, but after the establishment of the Empire, he could probably weasel out of any charges on the grounds of being an absolute monarch.

EDIT: Plus, where would you find an impartial jury?
“Heroes are heroes because they are heroic in behavior, not because they won or lost.” Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Ralin
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4556
Joined: 2008-08-28 04:23am

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Ralin »

Well he did kill a bunch of Republic soldiers/police in Labyrinth of Evil, the book set right before Revenge of the Sith, if I remember right...
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Stark »

Since he clearly plotted to make war on the republic, his other crimes are irrelevant. He'd get a nuremberg-style show trial where they'd tack on as many crimes as they could (probably including dumb stuff like 'made the jedi look bad' and 'interfered with minors') and be executed.
Crazy_Vasey
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1571
Joined: 2002-07-13 12:56pm

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Crazy_Vasey »

The clone wars alone leave him guilty of treason on an absolutely massive scale. Can you imagine the shitstorm that would ensue if it turned out that a real-world leader was encouraging violent insurrectionists through proxies for his own ends? Assuming they weren't able to bury it[1] they'd be heading for the noose or life in prison in very short order.

As for specifics, every atrocity of the clone wars can be directly traced back to Palpatine through his having command authority over both sides of the conflict. He's got about as much chance as a non-suicidal Hitler of making it through any trial that sees him exposed.

[1] And, let's face it, who'd believe a conspiracy theory in this sort of scale? I doubt you'd get anywhere with it until it was a historic event. The only way you could bring them to trial would be if the levers of power turned against them and there's too much mud to be spread around for that to actually happen. A real-life Palpatine would probably live out their reign and dotage before being buried a national hero.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Batman »

Since when does being a private citizen protect one from the consequences of having arranged a planetary invasion? If nothing else, the guy is guilty of being accomplice to a couple billion cases of trespassing, breaking and entering, aggravated assault and murder, and that's with treating the Naboo invasion as a fuckton of individual criminal acts.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
AMX
Jedi Knight
Posts: 853
Joined: 2004-09-30 06:43am

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by AMX »

Esquire wrote: As a private citizen, convince the Trade Federation to blockade Naboo - scummy, but likely to be technically legal.
I don't think Senator Palpatine of Naboo can be considered a "private citizen" in this case.
Even if some absurd legal loopholery means arranging war against his homeworld does not count as treason, it would at the very least be a gross dereliction of duty - he's supposed to further Naboo's interests, not blow it up.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12236
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Lord Revan »

AMX wrote:
Esquire wrote: As a private citizen, convince the Trade Federation to blockade Naboo - scummy, but likely to be technically legal.
I don't think Senator Palpatine of Naboo can be considered a "private citizen" in this case.
Even if some absurd legal loopholery means arranging war against his homeworld does not count as treason, it would at the very least be a gross dereliction of duty - he's supposed to further Naboo's interests, not blow it up.
considering that Nemoidians themselves assume that senate will not accept the invasion and occupation as legal (at least not without a treaty of some sort), wouldn't that mean even if Palpatine's actions were not treason per say, they would illegal (since he manipulated someone to perform an illegal act)
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Broken
Padawan Learner
Posts: 341
Joined: 2010-10-15 10:45am
Location: In Transit

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Broken »

Besides, you could just tack conspiracy charges to any number of those crimes. It doesn't matter if he's a private citizen if those charges show up.
"If you're caught with an ounce of cocaine, the chances are good you're going to jail. Evidently, if you launder nearly $1 billion for drug cartels and violate our international sanctions, your company pays a fine and you go home and sleep in your own bed at night." Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)


The Noldor are the Wise, and the Golden, the Valiant, the Sword-elves, the Elves of the Earth, the Foes of Melkor, the Skilled of Hand, the Jewel-wrights, the Companions of Men, the Followers of Finwë.
User avatar
atg
Jedi Master
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2005-04-20 09:23pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by atg »

Lord Revan wrote:wouldn't that mean even if Palpatine's actions were not treason per say, they would illegal (since he manipulated someone to perform an illegal act)
Palpatine outright orders the Trade Federation to invade Naboo in Phantom Menace, so it'd be more than 'manipulation'.
Marcus Aurelius: ...the Swedish S-tank; the exception is made mostly because the Swedes insisted really hard that it is a tank rather than a tank destroyer or assault gun
Ilya Muromets: And now I have this image of a massive, stern-looking Swede staring down a bunch of military nerds. "It's a tank." "Uh, yes Sir. Please don't hurt us."
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Batman »

Technically, unless Palpatine was somehow legally entitled to give orders to them, yes, that would likely fall under manipulation.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
Ralin
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4556
Joined: 2008-08-28 04:23am

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Ralin »

So we're assuming that the prosecution can produce evidence and witnesses of whatever, right? Because unless the war has ended I'm not seeing how you'd prove the Naboo thing anyway. Not like you can call Nute Gunray to Coruscant so he can testify.

I wonder if there's some sort of law against membership in the Sith? The Jedi certainly seem to feel within their rights to reach for their lightsabers when the subject comes up, and they're supposed to be the guardians of the Republic and its laws and all.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Havok »

This would actually be an interesting exercise to carry out. A mock trial.

Assume that Mace arrests Palpatine successfully after Anakin informs him that Palpatine is the Sith Lord they have been searching for.

The issue I think you would have to address first is if there is a law anywhere that prohibits the Chancellor of the Republic from also being the leader of another organization. I'm sure there is, but that would be your first hurdle. Second, while you could certainly prove Palpatine was a Sith Lord given the right evidence, could you prove that he was the Sith Lord that was leading the Separatists, when publicly it was confirmed to be Dooku and Grievous. Actually, even Anakin's testimony is shaky as while he accuses Palpatine of being the Sith Lord the Jedi are searching for, Palpatine never actually verbally confirms it.

Yoda, Mace and the rest of the Jedi High Council, while I'm sure would be recognized as a experts on the Sith, could not in a court of law say that they were sitting mere feet from Palpatine for over a decade and not know he was a Sith Lord then all of a sudden say they were positive he was a Sith Lord, let alone the Sith Lord that was secretly controlling the Separatists without serious damage to their credibility on the matter.

The only evidence that Palpatine is a Sith Lord is testimony from Anakin and from Mace based on what he did and said in the Chancellor's office. Still none of those feats automatically indicate he is a Sith Lord, after all a Jedi can perform them as well. Who is to say that there are no other Force practitioners present in the galaxy.

Now the Separatists leaders could very well provide evidence that they were under the control of another Sith Lord outside of Dooku, if you can prove he was a Sith Lord as well, but can they provide evidence that Palpatine was that Sith Lord?
Possibly voice and facial recognition software could be used if any holo-transmissions were saved by either party, but that is a pretty big if. (IIRC, on of the movie tie in novels had somebody hunting for one of the hologram transmitting walking platforms for evidence as to who the mysterious Sith Lord was)

Based on testimony you could prove A) Palpatine was trained in the Jedi arts. B) That he killed three Jedi Masters. C) There was another Sith Lord besides Maul and Dooku controlling Grievous and the Separatists. D) That Dooku used what were considered "Sith Powers". D) That Palpatine did not deny being a Sith Lord when confronted with the accusation. E) That Palpatine knew of Sith Lord lore.

I don't think this is quite the slam dunk case people may think it is.

If you get all the way to the end of A New Hope as the OP stipulates, proving any of the above becomes that much harder as you lose all the first hand testimony of the people that participated in events and Palpatine has 30+ years to destroy any evidence.

Destroying Alderaan for all we know, may have been perfectly legal given the fact that a new government usually facilitates new laws. Planetary rebellion could have legally been dealt with by planetary destruction. Keep in mind the Senate was around until just before Alderaan was destroyed. If the Senate of the Empire enacted any law giving Palpatine that type of power then it was a legal act that could only be deemed illegal by an overthrowing government itself. There is no "international community" to condemn what Palpatine did if the Imperial Senate sanctioned those types of military actions.

Again, an interesting exercise, but futile without knowing the laws that were current.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Havok »

Just some DA here.
Lord Revan wrote:
  • manufacturing the Naboo incident for political reasons (aka to allow him to elected Chancellor)
    How do you prove that Palpatine did this?
  • causing the Clone Wars and all the attrocities both the CIS and Republic did during the Clone Wars due being the mastermind behind both sides
    Prove that Palpatine was the person in control of the Separatists.
  • Unjust enprisonment of unknown number of sentients (aka political prisoners not directly involved with the rebellion)
    Was it unjust, i.e, illegal?
  • Slavery of unknown number of sentients for various reasons
    Define slavery under the laws of the First Galactic Empire, then show that Palpatine violated those laws.
  • destruction of Alderaan (indirectly)
    A) Prove Palpatine ordered and knew Tarkin was carrying out this act. B) Show that this act is not within the limits and rights of the military to carry out.
As I said, the Senate lasted right up until ANH. We aren't sure what laws were rewritten, enacted, struck down by the Imperial Senate that represented the same worlds that it had before under the Republic.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Stark »

As retarded as the idea of a 'fair trial' is, the idea of a fair trial for satan is even worse. He'd either be tried by a political system he owns and get off or by a political system he doesn't own and get everything and the kitchen sink pinned on him and shot in the head.

To be honest, given how worthless the Republic was I'm pretty sure Palpz would have had a contingency ready for any attempt to bring him to trial. By the time the war started he'd only need a day or two of stalling in committee or whatever nonsense to take over.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Havok »

Well Mace stated that Palpatine controlled the courts so yeah it would be ridiculous.
In the novelization he recorded the conversation in the office with Mace but he directed it so that it sounded like he was completely innocent and the Jedi were attacking him completely unwarranted in a coup attempt.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Stark »

Yah well people in space future believing recordings and shit is pretty funny stuff. :v

Just rip off the X-Files with Fux Molda trying to track down the space truth (which is space out there) and being roadblocked at every turn, never believed, crushed by the system, etc. :lol:
Ralin
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4556
Joined: 2008-08-28 04:23am

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Ralin »

Havok wrote:Second, while you could certainly prove Palpatine was a Sith Lord given the right evidence, could you prove that he was the Sith Lord that was leading the Separatists, when publicly it was confirmed to be Dooku and Grievous.
Who thought Grievous was a Sith?
In the novelization he recorded the conversation in the office with Mace but he directed it so that it sounded like he was completely innocent and the Jedi were attacking him completely unwarranted in a coup attempt.
And then he destroys the recorder, grins and kills everyone in the room who doesn't look like Samuel L Jackson. Still my second favorite part of the novelization.
Patroklos
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2577
Joined: 2009-04-14 11:00am

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Patroklos »

This all assumes he doesn't get off for various miscarraiges of justice anyway. I don't see how it can be legal for Mace to march into his sitting soverigns office with armed monks and arrest him without any word edgewise from any branch of government. Maybe if he was physically stopping a breach of peace like say Palpantine cutting down somebody with his light saber, but he was just sitting in his office.

At that point Mace knew nothing about Palpantine being behind the CIS, and they only suspected Sith involvment in the assassination plot ealier, and again there is the issue of what Sith. Basically all Mace knew was that the Chancellor was practicing a religion he didn't like. It might be a very taboo religion and warrant removal, but not that way. I'd imagine it would be like finding out the President is a Nazi and he owns up to it. Its not illegal, but I he wouldn't last long and be removed quite quickly via the legal process.

Of course Palpantine owned huge chunks of the Senate outright. A lot of people like to assume he is tricking everyone but he really needed sincere political support to accomplish his ends. I am sure he had as much or more legislative support via back room deals and dirt too, but to assume every Senator was either corrupt rather than actually believed in the New Order sincerely (that includes the population in general too) really cheapens Palpantine's accomplishment and makes him far less formidable as a villian.

So then you have the problem of who is going to try him? Probably the Senate, of which at least half are either true believers or in the Chancellors pocket for the govenrment we see to function in the first place. Are the Jedi going to arrest half the Senate too? This is why I think the idea of the "Cloister Coup" is one of the only intelligent plot points to come out of the RotS. Whether the Jedi were right or not to the audience is irrelevant, what the Galaxy at the time saw was a religious order arbitrariy attempt to arrest and then kill their sitting soverign who enjoyed legitimate and in part altruisitc support from their democratic (at the galactic level anyway) Senate without providing any evidence or even explaination as to why. Some of that is due to Palpantine suppressing it after the fact, but it is as much a result of Mace jumping the gun as well. Would it have killed him to give Bail Organa a call or better yet bring him with him so a respected Senator might speak to what actually happened and lend some legitimacy to the arrest?

And while a lot of people critisize the Order 66 thing about killing the rest of the Jedi as being something nobody would tolerate, it make sit a lot more likely that it will be tolerated if it is couched in the circumstances of an attempt to depose a legal and beloved leader in the middle of a war (and one he is about to win in the coming days to boot) with absolutely zero justification as far as anyone in universe can tell. Far more has been forgiven or accepted in real life over the centuries.

In any case I don't think a trail would work until after the New Republic was formed. In Nuremberg Germany wasn't the sole state in existance with everything flowing through its system of laws. There was were the laws and procedures of dozens of other coequal political entities to draw from and whatever they decided to make up. Until the Formation of the New Republic the only laws you can use are either the Republic's whom Palpantine was in the process of making his own or the Empire that was his own.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Havok »

Patroklos wrote:This all assumes he doesn't get off for various miscarraiges of justice anyway. I don't see how it can be legal for Mace to march into his sitting soverigns office with armed monks and arrest him without any word edgewise from any branch of government. Maybe if he was physically stopping a breach of peace like say Palpantine cutting down somebody with his light saber, but he was just sitting in his office.
Y'know, I really wish people would stop calling Jedi "monks". Monks don't actually control an energy field that allows them to do amazing thing like the Jedi can do. There is a tangible way to value a Jedi while there is none for a monk.
That said, they clearly have authority and jurisdiction to some degree to deal with matter of galactic influence and importance. I mean they automatically are commissioned as Generals in times of war and they seem to have a equal footing to some degree with the Senate. There has to be some level of authority there.
At that point Mace knew nothing about Palpantine being behind the CIS, and they only suspected Sith involvment in the assassination plot ealier, and again there is the issue of what Sith. Basically all Mace knew was that the Chancellor was practicing a religion he didn't like. It might be a very taboo religion and warrant removal, but not that way. I'd imagine it would be like finding out the President is a Nazi and he owns up to it. Its not illegal, but I he wouldn't last long and be removed quite quickly via the legal process.
Nope, at that point they knew damn sure there was Sith involvement. Even if you discount what Dooku tells Obi-Wan about a Sith in the Senate, they know for sure that Maul and Dooku were both Sith working for/with the CIS. And for fucks sake. The Sith is not just a religion people don't like. If that was all it was, why keep it a fucking secret? The galaxy may not remember as a whole, but there have to be records of what the Sith had done in the past, especially if you take the EU into account (which I hate doing) and people smart enough to keep the Jedi around clearly from that time.
And it would be in Germany. Why wouldn't the same situation apply in the GR where the Sith effectively were Nazis with real magic powers.
Of course Palpantine owned huge chunks of the Senate outright. A lot of people like to assume he is tricking everyone but he really needed sincere political support to accomplish his ends. I am sure he had as much or more legislative support via back room deals and dirt too, but to assume every Senator was either corrupt rather than actually believed in the New Order sincerely (that includes the population in general too) really cheapens Palpantine's accomplishment and makes him far less formidable as a villian.
Herein lies the problem. He probably did get a lot of legal legislation pushed through to empower him. In fact we know that from the movies directly. The thing is, if he is illegally in office or illegally acting as a Sith, it still wouldn't matter because you would still have to get the laws overturned and revoked. You now have what happened in The Dark Knight.
"Ok, so your chancellor is the most powerful man in the galaxy, leader of the largest army ever assembled and he is secretly a Sith Lord that single handedly destroyed the Jedi, and your plan is to remove him from legally elected office? Good luck." :lol:
So then you have the problem of who is going to try him? Probably the Senate, of which at least half are either true believers or in the Chancellors pocket for the govenrment we see to function in the first place. Are the Jedi going to arrest half the Senate too? This is why I think the idea of the "Cloister Coup" is one of the only intelligent plot points to come out of the RotS. Whether the Jedi were right or not to the audience is irrelevant, what the Galaxy at the time saw was a religious order arbitrariy attempt to arrest and then kill their sitting soverign who enjoyed legitimate and in part altruisitc support from their democratic (at the galactic level anyway) Senate without providing any evidence or even explaination as to why. Some of that is due to Palpantine suppressing it after the fact, but it is as much a result of Mace jumping the gun as well. Would it have killed him to give Bail Organa a call or better yet bring him with him so a respected Senator might speak to what actually happened and lend some legitimacy to the arrest?
You really have to get away from the idea that the galaxy views the Jedi as a "religious" order at this time. People recognize them as an organization with real power both individually and as a whole when dealing with the galaxy. Even little slave kids on Tattooine know they are real and what they can do. And that is before the propoganda machine of the Clone Wars kicks in.

Also and Mace is counting on Organa (and the rest of the "2000") after the fact. Once Palpatine is dead, his power-base falls apart and anyone closely associated with him instantly becomes suspect. The Jedi are trusted pretty implicitly at this point and if they say we are just keeping the seat warm until someone is legally elected or appointed or article of succession kick in, they would probably be taken at their word. You also have to remember that Mace is also heading in there with the word of the Hero of the Republic at his back as well. Anakin's direct testimony and the actions of the Jedi in relinquishing power which I imagine would be quite quickly.

You also have to remember that Palpatine was operating under "emergency powers" and if the Jedi win the war, which they do without Order 66, not to mention without Dooku, Grievous and with Sidious suddenly vanishing, then there would be an election held to replace Palpatine anyway. They don't even have to move to enact anything as it was already ready to go. Bail Organa is the likely replacement as well.
And while a lot of people critisize the Order 66 thing about killing the rest of the Jedi as being something nobody would tolerate, it make sit a lot more likely that it will be tolerated if it is couched in the circumstances of an attempt to depose a legal and beloved leader in the middle of a war (and one he is about to win in the coming days to boot) with absolutely zero justification as far as anyone in universe can tell. Far more has been forgiven or accepted in real life over the centuries.
No Palpatine, no Order 66 to fret over.
In any case I don't think a trail would work until after the New Republic was formed. In Nuremberg Germany wasn't the sole state in existance with everything flowing through its system of laws. There was were the laws and procedures of dozens of other coequal political entities to draw from and whatever they decided to make up. Until the Formation of the New Republic the only laws you can use are either the Republic's whom Palpantine was in the process of making his own or the Empire that was his own.
No way dude. You are thinking about it all wrong.
This would be akin to Nazi Germany winning, then being overthrown by the Allies 30 years later. The idea that Hitler would let any evidence of war crimes survive is virtually insane. There couldn't even be a trial at that point because everyone involved with it would essentially be dead and there would be no evidence and all the rest of the world would probably have acquiesced to Nazi Germany in some way in either suing for peace or becoming outright allies. You would be putting Hitler on trial in the 80's with practically no evidence and half the world cooperating with him for 30+ years.

It's like Stark already said, it is just a massive show trial at this point where the sentence will be DEATH TO PALPATINE! no matter what.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Saxtonite
Padawan Learner
Posts: 385
Joined: 2008-07-24 10:48am
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Saxtonite »

Esquire wrote:after the establishment of the Empire, he could probably weasel out of any charges on the grounds of being an absolute monarch.
He was not an absolute monarch. The Senate still had ultimate power over the Emperor, including the right to elect a new Galactic Emperor. Hence why he had to be very csareful of what was done in public as the Senate could and DID check his powers often.
"Opps, wanted to add; wasn't there a study about how really smart people lead shitty lives socially? I vaguely remember something about it, so correct me if I'm wrong. Frankly, I'm of the opinion that I'd rather let the new Newton or new Tesla lead a better life than have him have a shitty one and come up with apple powered death rays."
-Knife, in here
User avatar
Saxtonite
Padawan Learner
Posts: 385
Joined: 2008-07-24 10:48am
Location: Chicago, IL, USA

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Saxtonite »

Havok wrote: [*]Unjust enprisonment of unknown number of sentients (aka political prisoners not directly involved with the rebellion)
Was it unjust, i.e, illegal?
Given the Galactic Empire did it in the outer rim worlds and made sure to hide it from the Imperial Senate or otherwatchdog groups, it apparently -was- unjust and legally questionable enough.
As I said, the Senate lasted right up until ANH. We aren't sure what laws were rewritten, enacted, struck down by the Imperial Senate that represented the same worlds that it had before under the Republic.
I don't think the Senate which was full or rebel sympathizers and holdouts from the Old Republic would pass laws saying it is legal to wipe out planets, especially given the Emperor and Tarkin considered the Death Star a secret project as the Senate would oppose it.
Patroklos wrote:This all assumes he doesn't get off for various miscarraiges of justice anyway. I don't see how it can be legal for Mace to march into his sitting soverigns office with armed monks and arrest him without any word edgewise from any branch of government.

<snip>

So then you have the problem of who is going to try him? Probably the Senate, of which at least half are either true believers or in the Chancellors pocket for the govenrment we see to function in the first place. Are the Jedi going to arrest half the Senate too? This is why I think the idea of the "Cloister Coup" is one of the only intelligent plot points to come out of the RotS.
The Jedi served as chancellors in a seat-warming position/steading position until the Republic was stabilized in the Ruusan reformations. It was in the last decline of the Republic for the 1000 years or before Ruusan.
"Opps, wanted to add; wasn't there a study about how really smart people lead shitty lives socially? I vaguely remember something about it, so correct me if I'm wrong. Frankly, I'm of the opinion that I'd rather let the new Newton or new Tesla lead a better life than have him have a shitty one and come up with apple powered death rays."
-Knife, in here
User avatar
Zwinmar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1105
Joined: 2005-03-24 11:55am
Location: nunyadamnbusiness

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Zwinmar »

In SW, specially the time period your talking, there is no good guy, at best the Jedi are Lawful Neutral, at worst, as an organization, Lawful Evil, (they follow the law at the expense of people, hence why they can not be traditionally defined as good).

As for a trial for Palpatine, what is there to try? Unless it is a kangaroo court he covered his bases too well, even the clone army was grown at the behest of a Jedi master. All indications are that Palpatine just stepped up after the former chancellor was voted out...by his own people (aka the 'good' guys).
User avatar
Tiriol
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2038
Joined: 2005-09-15 11:31am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Tiriol »

Zwinmar wrote:In SW, specially the time period your talking, there is no good guy, at best the Jedi are Lawful Neutral, at worst, as an organization, Lawful Evil, (they follow the law at the expense of people, hence why they can not be traditionally defined as good).

As for a trial for Palpatine, what is there to try? Unless it is a kangaroo court he covered his bases too well, even the clone army was grown at the behest of a Jedi master. All indications are that Palpatine just stepped up after the former chancellor was voted out...by his own people (aka the 'good' guys).
How do you define the Jedi as an Order with the D&D alignment of Lawful Evil? I'd like to hear the explanation.
Confiteor Deo omnipotenti; beatae Mariae semper Virgini; beato Michaeli Archangelo; sanctis Apostolis, omnibus sanctis... Tibit Pater, quia peccavi nimis, cogitatione, verbo et opere, mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! Kyrie Eleison!

The Imperial Senate (defunct) * Knights Astrum Clades * The Mess
User avatar
Zwinmar
Jedi Master
Posts: 1105
Joined: 2005-03-24 11:55am
Location: nunyadamnbusiness

Re: Palpatine's crimes

Post by Zwinmar »

The willingness to 1.) enforce the law of a particular planet/sector regardless of conflict with morals or the conundrum of the cost of sentient life (e.g. Qui-Gon nominally supporting the slave system of the Hutts and willing to work with it though it is nominally illegal), 2.) willingness to take children by trickery, if not by outright theft, 3.) The willingness to compromise their own values even after a century or millennium.

At best their dogma and emotional detachment indicates a neutral stance as they will enforce the law regardless of consequence, at worst they will enforce the law despite the moral and ethical questions.

It seems to me that because the Jedi Order took law as their highest priority at the expense of everything else. What it comes down to is that both factions (Jedi and Sith) are all about power by any means, only their methods vary, leaving exceptions for individuals of course. Jedi are about power for their organization while the Sith is about power for self. If Yoda had cared to actually worry about other sentient beings and not his organization then conceivably he would have been able to actually see what was going on around him rather then be oblivious to what Dooku, and undoubtedly others like him, said. Rather than investigate why they left the Order the ones that left or had different ideological views were systematically hunted down and destroyed.
Post Reply