[Question] Fleet of the Imperial Remnant
Posted: 2003-03-28 05:49pm
Hi,
I'm just wondering if the Imperials have any SSDs left at the time of the NJO?
I'm just wondering if the Imperials have any SSDs left at the time of the NJO?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16190
In addition, they also had an assload of more star destroyers by that timer. Han was impressed with the size of their fleet and their ability to help turn the tide of the war, and when you consider that the battles in the NJO trypically involve hundreds of ships (the Battle of Black Bantha involved 1000 vong ships and 900 NR, fighters not counted, they hit Duros with a few dozen, Arkania with a Black Bantha sized fleet, Equab 9 with their entire offensive fleet even though it was only suppossed to kill the head of the NR, and Borealis with an assload) it strongly suggests higher numbers then 200. It appears the IR has a significant ship construction program going on.Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:SPOILERS:
As of SOTP, the Empire had roughly 200 ISDs remaining. As of Destiny's Way, they had a SSD. The Chimera was heavily damaged at the battle of Bastion, and is currently being repaired at Yaga Minor.
Chimaerais an ISD-II, not an SSD.Soontir C'boath wrote: Where's the Chimaera?
Yes, but the average ship involved at these engagements is inferior to an ISD. Two-hundred ISDs does not seem like a stretch considering the number of support and smaller vessels go with that.Ender wrote:In addition, they also had an assload of more star destroyers by that timer. Han was impressed with the size of their fleet and their ability to help turn the tide of the war, and when you consider that the battles in the NJO typically involve hundreds of ships (the Battle of Black Bantha involved 1000 vong ships and 900 NR, fighters not counted, they hit Duros with a few dozen, Arkania with a Black Bantha sized fleet, Equab 9 with their entire offensive fleet even though it was only suppossed to kill the head of the NR, and Borealis with an assload) it strongly suggests higher numbers then 200. It appears the IR has a significant ship construction program going on.
200 dreadnaughts turned the tide in the Thrawn Trilogy did they not? Daala's three ISDs were enough to fuck with the NR for a little while. For whatever reason in SW, small numbers of ships seem to be powerful enough that even huge galaxy spanning civilizations will be largely effected by them.Illuminatus Primus wrote:Yes, but the average ship involved at these engagements is inferior to an ISD. Two-hundred ISDs does not seem like a stretch considering the number of support and smaller vessels go with that.
Also, since the Galactic Alliance thwarted the Vong at Ebaq, and the IR gets the shit kicked out of them, I'd hardly throw the Empire's diddly 8 sectors credit for "turning the tide of the war" against the Vong.
Really?Darth Garden Gnome wrote:200 dreadnaughts turned the tide in the Thrawn Trilogy did they not? Daala's three ISDs were enough to fuck with the NR for a little while. For whatever reason in SW, small numbers of ships seem to be powerful enough that even huge galaxy spanning civilizations will be largely effected by them.
Lifted from the EGTC:Illuminatus Primus wrote:Prove the Katana fleet was winning the campiagn for Thrawn.
It seems to me just part of the beefing-up of for his major assualts and psyops strategy he employed. He used the dreaded Katana fleet to beef up his own forward offensive fleets, and used clones in the most intense assaults in order to give his forces the edge; he only had fifty thousand cylinders or so, he couldn't produce that many troops to really affect his overall production.
Despite there small numbers, the point stands that they were vital to the war. Everyone was making a big deal out of, they fought a battle over them. Thats right, they were willing to lose ships for this fleet.Illuminatus Primus wrote:It is EU bullshit. We know the calcs for fleet size just based on what the NR and GE need to simply patrol their borders. Marina made it painfully clear the Empire needed millions and millions of ships merely to hold its own territory and keep the peace. Zahn's stupidity and inability to recognize decent scale (he loved WEG) and thus thinking 200 frigate-scale "dreadnoughts" and several tens-of-thousands of clone cylinders would be the all-to-beat-all.
In all the sources I've seen the Katana Fleet was a make-or-break moment for the NR. Like the EGTC quote above.Corran comments how the Katana fleet could flip the war one way or the other during the X-Wing Series. Do you expect me to just take that dialogue at face-value? It is just like how people took the impressions of the Hand of Thrawn Duology and assumed the Chiss were ubermesnch with thousands of ISDs ready to crush the silly Rebels, and we discovered this wasn't the case.
Sourcebooks also stress the importance fo the Katana Fleet. And dialouge was backed up by the fact that the NR had a sapce battle for the Fleet! If 200 Dreadnaughts were insignificantly useless, why would have either side bothered? Why didn't the NR just let Thrawn have them if they were worthless? They fought over them, so they must have been important.EU dialogue and face-value statements from source materials is as worthless as Star Trek character dailogue.
It is not hard to understand. The forces they were fighting over the Katana fleet with were not worth as much as the Katana fleet. The Katana fleet is two hundred frigate-class vessels that a handful of SDs and NR ships fought over. The net worth of the Katana fleet is greater than the net worth of the combatants at their location. This does not mean that the Katana fleet could swing a war one way or another. That is an enormous leap in logic.Darth Garden Gnome wrote:Despite there small numbers, the point stands that they were vital to the war. Everyone was making a big deal out of, they fought a battle over them. Thats right, they were willing to lose ships for this fleet.Illuminatus Primus wrote:It is EU bullshit. We know the calcs for fleet size just based on what the NR and GE need to simply patrol their borders. Marina made it painfully clear the Empire needed millions and millions of ships merely to hold its own territory and keep the peace. Zahn's stupidity and inability to recognize decent scale (he loved WEG) and thus thinking 200 frigate-scale "dreadnoughts" and several tens-of-thousands of clone cylinders would be the all-to-beat-all.
And they lost it AND they found out Thrawn was making clones. Yet the Republic held together despite the fact we know the Republic is politically unstable, and they still controlled more than half the galaxy. Thrawn just kicked more ass more easily with the advantages represented by the Katana fleet and Mount Tantiss for his offensive.Darth Garden Gnome wrote:In all the sources I've seen the Katana Fleet was a make-or-break moment for the NR. Like the EGTC quote above.Illuminatus Primus wrote:Corran comments how the Katana fleet could flip the war one way or the other during the X-Wing Series. Do you expect me to just take that dialogue at face-value? It is just like how people took the impressions of the Hand of Thrawn Duology and assumed the Chiss were ubermesnch with thousands of ISDs ready to crush the silly Rebels, and we discovered this wasn't the case.
Do you think a single ancient fleet of vessels, that, when compared with the scale of KDY standard ships and the Empire's production capabilities, is merely a frigate-scale vessel, that cannot project power like the Imperator-class destroyer can, and that can be destroyed by groups of heavy bombers is significant in a "make or break" fashion? Merely because they say so?Darth Garden Gnome wrote:As for the Chiss, you've given us evidence that they are inferior. You have not given us evidence that the Katana Fleet was no big deal.
Because it is a political prize. Thrawn's reclaimation of the Katana fleet is powerful. The Katana fleet itself is almost mystical to some in-universe characters. Because the ships that were fighting over the Katana fleet; their net worth is lower than the net worth of the Katana fleet. That isn't hard to understand. That also doesn't require the absurd hyperbole bullshit that Zahn and Anderson have crammed down our throats.Darth Garden Gnome wrote:Sourcebooks also stress the importance fo the Katana Fleet. And dialouge was backed up by the fact that the NR had a sapce battle for the Fleet! If 200 Dreadnaughts were insignificantly useless, why would have either side bothered? Why didn't the NR just let Thrawn have them if they were worthless? They fought over them, so they must have been important.Illuminatus Primus wrote:EU dialogue and face-value statements from source materials is as worthless as Star Trek character dailogue.
Could have swore there were more thn a "handful" of ships, but I'll take your word for it. I can see how it would be beneficial for them.Illuminatus Primus wrote:It is not hard to understand. The forces they were fighting over the Katana fleet with were not worth as much as the Katana fleet. The Katana fleet is two hundred frigate-class vessels that a handful of SDs and NR ships fought over. The net worth of the Katana fleet is greater than the net worth of the combatants at their location. This does not mean that the Katana fleet could swing a war one way or another. That is an enormous leap in logic.
Well that is a bit different. The ships were important to Thrawn (being in a ship-starved post-ROTJ Empire) for his clones, while it may not have been important to the Republic, having all the ships in the majority fo the galaxy. By that token, the Republic didn't need them, but they didn't want Thrawn to have them either.And they lost it AND they found out Thrawn was making clones. Yet the Republic held together despite the fact we know the Republic is politically unstable, and they still controlled more than half the galaxy. Thrawn just kicked more ass more easily with the advantages represented by the Katana fleet and Mount Tantiss for his offensive.
Again, there are multiple sourcebooks that claim likewise, however-one thing to consider is that the "millions of ships" may not combat ships. That instead combat ships are the minority of the NRs fleet, and so when 200 battlewagons do stroll in, they become important.Answer the question. In a galaxy where millions and millions of massive vessels are needed for patrolling territory, are you going to take some fight jockey's opinion as 100% fact, regardless?
The Katana Fleet is stressed by numerous sources. As above, it seems more likely it was important because of Thrawns use for them, not theirs. After all, even that small edge Thrawn can get in battle with them is important.Do you think a single ancient fleet of vessels, that, when compared with the scale of KDY standard ships and the Empire's production capabilities, is merely a frigate-scale vessel, that cannot project power like the Imperator-class destroyer can, and that can be destroyed by groups of heavy bombers is significant in a "make or break" fashion? Merely because they say so?
Point taken. The Katana Fleet gave Thrawn a psychological edge, ect. Makes sense now. Once again I have been enlightened. Concession granted.Because it is a political prize. Thrawn's reclaimation of the Katana fleet is powerful. The Katana fleet itself is almost mystical to some in-universe characters. Because the ships that were fighting over the Katana fleet; their net worth is lower than the net worth of the Katana fleet. That isn't hard to understand. That also doesn't require the absurd hyperbole bullshit that Zahn and Anderson have crammed down our throats.
Like I said, Thrawn pulls these political and psychological shows all the time to try and minimize the actual fighting his forces are forced to do.
I'll paint a picture.<snip>
I never questioned it was one. I know it is not an Executor-classIG-88E wrote:Chimaerais an ISD-II, not an SSD.Soontir C'boath wrote: Where's the Chimaera?
You don't happen to remember the name of that SSD?Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:SPOILERS:
As of SOTP, the Empire had roughly 200 ISDs remaining. As of Destiny's Way, they had a SSD. The Chimera was heavily damaged at the battle of Bastion, and is currently being repaired at Yaga Minor.
I'm fairly confident the name is the Defiant A ship described as a Star Destroyer (no class given, so it could be any) was described mounting rare and expensive equipment on it (indicating it is a command type ship as you would not mount that on say a Vicstar), firing missiles (Which ISDs appear to lack, on the Chimera there are proton torpedo launcehers, not Concussion missile launchers, and the Chimera had undergone a standard NR ISD refit when it was captured before the imperials got it back so torps are not common on ISDs now in the IR), and it ripped a hole in the Vong fleet led by 2 their equivlent to the Allegiance class Star Destroyer.Crazy Ivan wrote:You don't happen to remember the name of that SSD?
Or Zahn is a dumbass.Kazuaki Shimazaki wrote:Thrawn's Core Star Destroyer force and the NR Battle Fleet seem to be levers. Concentrating on the correct places, they can influence the course of the galaxy even though they are actually very small forces
I was under the impression that you thought it was one, since you made that comment right after the SSD question.Soontir C'boath wrote: I never questioned it was one. I know it is not an Executor-class
Thrawn never ran any Empire, He commanded the Empires Navy, The Navy answered and still does to the Imperial Moffs who rule the Imperial Sectors.Illuminatus Primus wrote:Or Zahn is a dumbass.Kazuaki Shimazaki wrote:Thrawn's Core Star Destroyer force and the NR Battle Fleet seem to be levers. Concentrating on the correct places, they can influence the course of the galaxy even though they are actually very small forces
Come on, did ever occur to anyone we never see ANY of the rest of the Imperial front or warfleets? We never see Thrawn running an Empire.