This is from the latest issue of Marvel's (canon) Star Wars comic that takes place right after ANH:
Spoiler
Moderator: Vympel
Aside from being a total ripoff of Gambit's storyline in his early X-Men days, I see nothing wrong with this at all. Solo is a charming rogue. I have no trouble believing that he left a trail of broken hearts throughout the galaxy in his pre-rebellion adventuring days.Burak Gazan wrote:Sweet merciful ....
The whole goddamned point of the character of Han SOLO was he was a loner. Until he hooked up with the alliance for-real, and Leia, he was in it for himself. Period. So this 'secret wife' out of nowhere is a steaming pile of bullshit. More and MORE epic fails...
Similarly, I have no trouble believing he's a heartless prick for the same reason, breaking hearts for nought other than his own gratification and laughing about it later on.Galvatron wrote:Aside from being a total ripoff of Gambit's storyline in his early X-Men days, I see nothing wrong with this at all. Solo is a charming rogue. I have no trouble believing that he left a trail of broken hearts throughout the galaxy in his pre-rebellion adventuring days.
Because people never change and are merely one-note archetypes for their entire life and writing them that way makes for good fiction and not boring, simplistic stereotypes.Galvatron wrote:Aside from being a total ripoff of Gambit's storyline in his early X-Men days, I see nothing wrong with this at all. Solo is a charming rogue. I have no trouble believing that he left a trail of broken hearts throughout the galaxy in his pre-rebellion adventuring days.Burak Gazan wrote:Sweet merciful ....
The whole goddamned point of the character of Han SOLO was he was a loner. Until he hooked up with the alliance for-real, and Leia, he was in it for himself. Period. So this 'secret wife' out of nowhere is a steaming pile of bullshit. More and MORE epic fails...
Quite frankly, this is also why I never liked the idea of Han settling down and marrying Leia to become a family man. I hope TFA reveals to us that they split up some time after ROTJ because of Solo's uncontainable nature.
Yeah, well, because the OT didn't show Han Solo changing from the charming rogue and loner into a responsible/respectable leader-figure ("Who volunteered for that nonsense?" "General Solo ...").Galvatron wrote:Aside from being a total ripoff of Gambit's storyline in his early X-Men days, I see nothing wrong with this at all. Solo is a charming rogue. I have no trouble believing that he left a trail of broken hearts throughout the galaxy in his pre-rebellion adventuring days.Burak Gazan wrote:Sweet merciful ....
The whole goddamned point of the character of Han SOLO was he was a loner. Until he hooked up with the alliance for-real, and Leia, he was in it for himself. Period. So this 'secret wife' out of nowhere is a steaming pile of bullshit. More and MORE epic fails...
Quite frankly, this is also why I never liked the idea of Han settling down and marrying Leia to become a family man. I hope TFA reveals to us that they split up some time after ROTJ because of Solo's uncontainable nature.
I've made no secret of my dislike for ROTJ, especially because of how it handled Han.FTeik wrote:Yeah, well, because the OT didn't show Han Solo changing from the charming rogue and loner into a responsible/respectable leader-figure ("Who volunteered for that nonsense?" "General Solo ...").
Aren't you a Star Trek fan? Given the recurring theme of both Kirk and Picard sacrificing normal lives to continue "hopping galaxies," I figured you'd understand that sort of character better than most.The Romulan Republic wrote:Why? Because it showed that the character could actually change? Develop? Be more than a one-note character?
Picard doesn't have a normal life because he's a man upon whom duty has landed with a sickening thud*; he's too busy doing a job that obviously exerts a lot of stress upon him and which he obviously feels a strong ideological commitment to.Galvatron wrote:Aren't you a Star Trek fan? Given the recurring theme of both Kirk and Picard sacrificing normal lives to continue "hopping galaxies," I figured you'd understand that sort of character better than most.The Romulan Republic wrote:Why? Because it showed that the character could actually change? Develop? Be more than a one-note character?
Well, Han getting married and having kids is not in itself "the traditional family man," is it? Or if it is, then "the traditional family man" makes up the vast majority of the male human experience.And I don't think it's either undeveloped or one-note for such a character to successfully resist falling into that traditional family man role. It doesn't mean he has to be a selfish rogue for the rest of his life.
I thought it was outright stated or at least inferred on more than one occasion that both Kirk and Picard were "married" to the Enterprise. Even if they share no other character traits, I'd say Han has at least that in common with the Star Trek captains.The Romulan Republic wrote:To me, the lack of a normal family is a relatively minor part of Kirk and Picard's characterization.