StarDestroyer.Net BBS

http:// boards.theforce.net/message.asp?topic=11751774&start=11773453

Asshole.

IP. = Lord_Darth_Bob, By the way.

If you are refering to the lines about the designation of the SDs on the OT, their designations were given in the official blueprints and it says that they are Imperator class...

Invite them here to be chewed on for a bit.

I would aid you in asskicking, but it's been a month and my registration has yet to be approved.

ROFL! These people actually think that Ties use solar power!

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:ROFL! These people actually think that Ties use solar power!

Why yes they do! The wings obviously look like solar panels! But I'll sttart fighting in there been absent for a month.

Ender wrote:Invite them here to be chewed on for a bit.

'

I'd prefer not to. If they know I'm a reg here, they'll use that as justification to smear me and all my opinion from now on.

Not to mention they think they're above us.

??????????

Sorry, bur I don't see anything.....
The link is dead.
Care to help me to see that...."discussion"?

Illuminatus Primus wrote:Not to mention they think they're above us.

All the more reason to bring them down.

I understand your position of not wnating them using your association here to illogically and unanimously write off everythig you say... but it is extremely difficult to engage them when their moderators are dumber then the regulars and hold the field.

Perhaps a series of one on one debate challenges would be in order. I'd have to wait until I get my books in July when I'm on leave, but still...

Don't get me wrong--I'd love to have a canon/method of analysis debate with some of the primier TF.net-ers. Do debunk their anti-SD.net/Saxton-ism, and their idiotic "everything is canon and on equal standing" bullshit.

But Syntax at least would never dare. He'd make some sort of character attack on why we're an inherently unfair board or something.

Illuminatus Primus wrote:Don't get me wrong--I'd love to have a canon/method of analysis debate with some of the primier TF.net-ers. Do debunk their anti-SD.net/Saxton-ism, and their idiotic "everything is canon and on equal standing" bullshit.

But Syntax at least would never dare. He'd make some sort of character attack on why we're an inherently unfair board or something.

As he continues to write off your points because of your association with this site, then continue to write off his character attacks as ad homenim. Therefore, absolutley nothing he says is worth anything to anyone intelligent and logical.

Tribun wrote:??????????

Sorry, bur I don't see anything.....
The link is dead.
Care to help me to see that...."discussion"?

It's not a dead link. IP puts a space between "//" and "boards" when linking to TF.N's discussion board so they can't trace them back to this board.

Tribun wrote:??????????

Sorry, bur I don't see anything.....
The link is dead.
Care to help me to see that...."discussion"?

Just put the url tags around it.
like [.url]www.whatever.com[/url], just no dot.

No, Tycho, no. Bad advice, bad dog!!