Page 1 of 2
[minor SPOILER]Episode II-III time lapse, Hayden bulking up
Posted: 2003-06-07 12:18pm
by Vympel
Hayden Christensen bulks up in Sydney to play a 'non-wimpy' intergalactic villain and misses Toronto
By GAYLE MacDONALD
Thursday, June 5, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not easy playing the most notorious intergalactic baddie.
For four months now, Hayden Christensen has been working out like a fiend and basically scarfing down everything he can lay his hands on in order to bulk up for his role in the next Star Wars where his Anakin Skywalker will finally evolve into the dreaded Darth Vader.
So far, the Canadian actor's packed about 20 pounds onto his rangy, six-foot-one-inch frame. But Christensen figures he's got at least another 10 to 15 to go before he'll have amassed the heft that the Dark-Side Darth demands.
"I'm working out every day for an hour or two," says the 22-year-old, who was born in Vancouver and grew up in the tidy Toronto suburb of Thornhill. "I'm eating anything I can get my hands on, and I'm taking lots of protein supplements. I'm probably in better shape than I've ever been before."
"Usually I have a very lean build, some might even say skinny," he goes on. "But my physique is completely changing right now. It has to. You can't have a wimpy Darth Vader."
As of last Friday, Christensen weighed in at 175. He's aiming for 190. And he wants to hit that benchmark in three weeks, when Queen Amidala (Christensen's one-time rumoured love interest, Natalie Portman), Obi-Wan Kenobi (Ewan McGregor) and the rest of the Star Wars crew join him in Sydney, Australia, to start shooting the eagerly awaited prequel.
It's 11 a.m. on Friday morning, and Christensen's doing the interview by cellphone, just outside the stunt office on the Twentieth Century Fox lot in the Aussie city. He's excused himself to shut a door, a vain attempt to muffle the din of clashing light sabres and other frankly weird clanging noises.
"Sorry about that," he says politely, trying to catch his breath. "We're choreographing a light sabre battle." Just as in Star Wars: Episode II -- Attack of the Clones, Christensen insists on doing his own crouching-tiger, high-wire acts. Why, one might ask, does he insist on getting battered and bruised when a double would gladly take the knocks for him?
"It's a unique film to be a part of, and I sort of want to do as much as I can," he explains. "I want to know -- at every point in the film when I see my characer -- it's actually me. Not some stunt person or a digitally rendered version of me. It's just important."
It's been raining in Sydney the past week. Today, the sun's finally broken, and Christensen, who considers everything he says very carefully, describes the day as "sunny and temperate. Like a cool summer day in Toronto." He misses home, particularly his parents, three siblings and Unionville High School pals. But like every role this young man's taken in the past four years, he's totally immersed in the upcoming Clone War, focused on figuring out how best to play Anakin, once a goody-two-shoes Jedi who's soon to switch teams.
Asked for a hint of what Star Wars fanatics might expect from Episode III, Christensen just breathes quietly into the phone, and chuckles. "It's tough to talk about this because there's so many confidentiality agreements that you sign. Let's just say 10 years has passed and he's sort of come into new responsibilities with his marriage. He just has different things on his plate right now. A few more layers."
Critics, by and large, have been kind to Christensen, who is often compared to James Dean because of his on-screen blend of charm that's boy-next-door but also brooding, potentially dangerous. In the film Life as a House -- where he played the pill-popping, prodigiously pierced son to Kevin Kline's dying dad -- he was commended for his ability to change his look from angelic to indecent with a flash of his eyes. Apparently, it was that knack that grabbed the attention of Star Wars: Episode II's casting director. And ultimately sold Lucas to choose Christensen, then a virtual unknown, over hundreds of Anakin hopefuls.
If someone does figure out he's that Star Wars guy, he says they usually just say hi and go on their merry way. "Canadians, as a whole, are pretty laid back about the whole celebrity thing. They don't put too much value on it."
Compared to the week-long horror of Eco Challenge, surely Star Wars: Episode III will be a piece of cake? "Not exactly", says Christensen, who adds Lucas's shooting schedule is intense. He expects to be in Australia at least until October, and he won't be visiting home. But he figures his family will make the trip. "I'll probably get the whole gang out here," he says.
And he's equally coy about whether Star Wars devotees will be seeing him in Vader's enormous helmet and flowing black robes. "Possibly," is all Christensen will say. Then he politely excuses himself. The Empire calls.
Ok, so who's in a better position to know- McCallum on the Jedi Council before shooting started, or Christensen when the shooting seems to be on?
10 years instead of 3-5 years?
Personally, I think it's 3-5 years- the latter time period has been confirmed by two seperate Lucas sources.
Posted: 2003-06-07 12:44pm
by neoolong
I think it depends on how much of the script each has seen. Though honestly, 10 years will make the characters seem to not have aged very much.
Posted: 2003-06-07 01:13pm
by Enforcer Talen
so he is being paid to lift weights?
Posted: 2003-06-07 01:20pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Ten years would make Luke and Leia only about 15 in ANH.
I'm thinking either he doesn't know and just took a guess, or that he made a mistake and gave the wrong length of time by accident.
Posted: 2003-06-07 01:20pm
by YT300000
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Ten years would make Luke and Leia only about 15 in ANH.
I'm thinking either he doesn't know and just took a guess, or that he made a mistake and gave the wrong length of time by accident.
Or on purpose.
Posted: 2003-06-07 01:45pm
by Ender
Perhaps episode 3 takes place over a number of years, and by the end 10 have passed since AOTC.
Or perhaps he thought that since 10 had passed between episodes 1 & 2, another 10 had passed between 2 & 3
Posted: 2003-06-07 02:49pm
by Lonestar
Enforcer Talen wrote:so he is being paid to lift weights?
Why not? Tobey Mcguire was.
Posted: 2003-06-07 03:02pm
by Lord Pounder
10 years difference? That means that the idea of Boba killing Windu isn't so implausable. It's make Boba 18-22 tall enough to pilot Slave 1 and maybe tall enough to wear the famous armour.
Posted: 2003-06-07 04:20pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Oh, let's
PLEASE not bring that Fett killing Windu garbage again...
The basic fact is that Christinsen either goofed up or he didn't know and guessed. I personally trust McCallum (the executive producer) over Hayden Christinsen (an actor) over when Episode III takes place, especially since the 3-5 year mark was pretty much established back in 1998-99...
Posted: 2003-06-07 06:52pm
by YT300000
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Oh, let's PLEASE not bring that Fett killing Windu garbage again...
What do you have against it?
btw, nice avatar
Posted: 2003-06-07 07:06pm
by Darth Yoshi
YT300000 wrote:Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Oh, let's PLEASE not bring that Fett killing Windu garbage again...
What do you have against it?
btw, nice avatar
Well, there's the fact that Mace would be getting killed off by a friggin'
kid. Hardly the coolest way to die, especially for a Samuel L. Jackson character.
Posted: 2003-06-07 07:16pm
by Joe
Ender wrote:Perhaps episode 3 takes place over a number of years, and by the end 10 have passed since AOTC.
Or perhaps he thought that since 10 had passed between episodes 1 & 2, another 10 had passed between 2 & 3
Unlikely. That would make it the first SW film to not take place over the course of several days.
Posted: 2003-06-07 07:52pm
by YT300000
Darth Yoshi wrote:Well, there's the fact that Mace would be getting killed off by a friggin' kid. Hardly the coolest way to die, especially for a Samuel L. Jackson character.
But the
kid is Boba Fett. By AoTC he was already really good. By Ep. III he will be even better. 2, 3, 5, maybe even 10 years, make a big difference to a kid who will probably be in constant danger and combat.
Posted: 2003-06-07 07:59pm
by Ender
Durran Korr wrote:Ender wrote:Perhaps episode 3 takes place over a number of years, and by the end 10 have passed since AOTC.
Or perhaps he thought that since 10 had passed between episodes 1 & 2, another 10 had passed between 2 & 3
Unlikely. That would make it the first SW film to not take place over the course of several days.
Empire strikes back lasts about two months.
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:00pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
YT, you have NO idea how many times we've already discussed and debated that issue. The general consensus is that most of us do NOT want Windu to go down like a dog and get killed by a punk. The only people who do are so profusely masturbating by it that they become blind to its idiocy.
So don't try to debate it, it's been done already. To death.
Besides, it's only 3-5 years, as established by McCallum. We don't want Windu killed by a 13-15 year old PUNK, no matter how "bad ass" he is.
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:03pm
by Joe
Ender wrote:Durran Korr wrote:Ender wrote:Perhaps episode 3 takes place over a number of years, and by the end 10 have passed since AOTC.
Or perhaps he thought that since 10 had passed between episodes 1 & 2, another 10 had passed between 2 & 3
Unlikely. That would make it the first SW film to not take place over the course of several days.
Empire strikes back lasts about two months.
So, do Han, Leia, and Chewie just sit on that rock for days? Not trying to be vindictive, just asking. Is there a timeline or something?
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:11pm
by Darth Yoshi
No, I think that's how long it took them to reach Bespin from the asteroid belt. Although the Star Destroyers could have stayed in the asteroid belt that long.
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:12pm
by Joe
Darth Yoshi wrote:No, I think that's how long it took them to reach Bespin from the asteroid belt. Although the Star Destroyers could have stayed in the asteroid belt that long.
Slow day in hyperspace, huh?
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:18pm
by Ender
Durran Korr wrote:Ender wrote:Durran Korr wrote:
Unlikely. That would make it the first SW film to not take place over the course of several days.
Empire strikes back lasts about two months.
So, do Han, Leia, and Chewie just sit on that rock for days? Not trying to be vindictive, just asking. Is there a timeline or something?
So luke became a Jedi in days? The majority of the time was the 2 months trip on the backup hyperdrive between Hoth and Bespin according to the essential chronology
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:20pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
ESB had to span at least several weeks for Luke to have received anywhere near a decent amount of Jedi training from Yoda.
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:20pm
by neoolong
Years would look rather awkward since you would have to see them age. And that would necessitate the use of many subtitles saying that years have passed.
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:25pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
neoolong wrote:Years would look rather awkward since you would have to see them age. And that would necessitate the use of many subtitles saying that years have passed.
And that would somewhat conflict with the general artistic feel of the saga, since none of the other films used establishing subtitles.
Posted: 2003-06-07 08:42pm
by YT300000
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:YT, you have NO idea how many times we've already discussed and debated that issue. The general consensus is that most of us do NOT want Windu to go down like a dog and get killed by a punk. The only people who do are so profusely masturbating by it that they become blind to its idiocy.
So don't try to debate it, it's been done already. To death.
Besides, it's only 3-5 years, as established by McCallum. We don't want Windu killed by a 13-15 year old PUNK, no matter how "bad ass" he is.
Sorry, I've only been here (lurked then joined) for about a month. I have no idea how many times the issue has been debated. Yeah, it probably would be stupid to see Boba kill Mace.
I hope that Anakin fights Mace.
Posted: 2003-06-07 09:00pm
by Ender
My hope is still that Mace goes down in a reverse of the duel in TPM. I want to see Mace buying Obi wan, Yoda, and the twins time to escape the Jedi temple by facing down Anakin and Palpatine at the same time before getting killed.
Holding your own against 2 sith lords in an act of self sacrafice would definately not be "dieing like a punk"
Posted: 2003-06-07 09:09pm
by YT300000
Ender wrote:My hope is still that Mace goes down in a reverse of the duel in TPM. I want to see Mace buying Obi wan, Yoda, and the twins time to escape the Jedi temple by facing down Anakin and Palpatine at the same time before getting killed.
Holding your own against 2 sith lords in an act of self sacrafice would definately not be "dieing like a punk"
I don't think Palpatine should attack anyone. It would only detract from my favorite scene in the movies (see my avatar).