ISD Sensors

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
Kazeite
Village Idiot
Posts: 111
Joined: 2002-09-20 06:11am
Location: Poland, Lodz
Contact:

ISD Sensors

Post by Kazeite »

Hi, I'm new here.

Con you tell me why ISDs were not able to detect Falcon attached to the bridge tower of Avenger?

(since I'm sure this was discussed many times before, just point me to the relevant thread. Thank You in advance :) )

Kazeite
User avatar
Akm72
Padawan Learner
Posts: 238
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:25am
Location: Sussex, UK

Re: ISD Sensors

Post by Akm72 »

Kazeite wrote:Hi, I'm new here.

Con you tell me why ISDs were not able to detect Falcon attached to the bridge tower of Avenger?

(since I'm sure this was discussed many times before, just point me to the relevant thread. Thank You in advance :) )

Kazeite
In the same way that a US navy AEGIS equipped warship wouldn't be able to use it's radar to track a small craft right alongside.
It should be pointed out that the Avenger DID have some chance of detecting the Falcon though - which is why Han quickly shut-down every non-essential system on his ship after landing.
"Scientists do not join hands every Sunday, singing, "Yes, gravity is real! I will have faith! I will be strong! I believe in my heart that what goes up, up, up must come down, down, down. Amen!" If they did, we would think they were pretty insecure about it."
- Dan Barker
Kazeite
Village Idiot
Posts: 111
Joined: 2002-09-20 06:11am
Location: Poland, Lodz
Contact:

Post by Kazeite »

Thank you for your reply :)

But... that brings another question: what about other ISDs? If I understand correctly, that all warfare jamming actually distorts profile of the ship, so that small extra bump could remain unnoticed?

Kazeite
User avatar
Akm72
Padawan Learner
Posts: 238
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:25am
Location: Sussex, UK

Post by Akm72 »

Kazeite wrote:Thank you for your reply :)
My pleasure :)

Kazeite wrote: But... that brings another question: what about other ISDs? If I understand correctly, that all warfare jamming actually distorts profile of the ship, so that small extra bump could remain unnoticed?

Kazeite
It is probable that if they'd looked for the Falcon attached to the back of the Avenger, they'd have seen it (with sensors or eyeballs). But they simply accepted the words of Captain Needa and his crew, who told them that the Falcon 'must' have jumped to lightspeed, so they didn't look. So it doesn't really tell us anything about the capabilities of an ISDs sensors.
"Scientists do not join hands every Sunday, singing, "Yes, gravity is real! I will have faith! I will be strong! I believe in my heart that what goes up, up, up must come down, down, down. Amen!" If they did, we would think they were pretty insecure about it."
- Dan Barker
User avatar
Laughing Mechanicus
Jedi Knight
Posts: 721
Joined: 2002-09-21 11:46am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by Laughing Mechanicus »

If you are interested Lord Wong has a long discussion about it with Robert Walper on one of their e-mail exchanges here. Just use the search function to find the first instance of the word "Falcon" on the page and you'll find the rellavent argument.
Indie game dev, my website: SlowBladeSystems. Twitter: @slowbladesys
Also officer of the Sunday Simmers, a Steam group for war game and simulation enthusiasts
Post Reply