FTeik wrote:All I see is whining and dismissal of the Dark Empire Sourcebook because you don't like it.
My apologizes, that i don´t like the idea of dozens of different warships showing up and never be seen again.
Yeah, because Zahn's grand vision of six ISDs being the only major fleet in the Empire and never even referring to anything else is brilliant.
The idea that the Empire is somehow incapable of building larger ships, and that anything would be interim between the 17.6 kilometer Executor and the 1.6 km ISD.
Apparently you never doesn't know what Marvel is, what the Jedi Knight games are, Episode II ICS, Han Solo Adventures (featuring the 2 km Invincible dreadnought).
Hell, what about the canonical ROTJ "communications ship" and the aberrant destroyer?
I'm never not amused by people who think the Empire never built anything between their command ship and destroyer, even though there an eleven fold difference in length and god knows how much in volume.
They look at the Dodonna calcs and the fact that the Death Star II was 60% constructed in six months with no dedicated shipyard facilities from raw materials and was worth the volume of 24 million ISD and conclude the ISD had to be mother of all warships, in coordinace with WEG.
Nevermind that common refitted frieghters can be double the length. Old Dreadnought from thousands of years ago are much larger.
I don't know why I'm bothering. If you don't recognize that Dark Empire is more in line with the correct scale of a
galaxy-wide civilization nothing I'm going to say is going to change that.
Besides, the "it is never seen again" is not only wrong, its also an appeal to popularity. Do we accept the 8 km length because it is named a lot? Does the number of repetitions mean anything from a logical point of view? Great logic, Stravo and FTeik.
FTeik wrote:Forgive me for not liking World-Devastators, Eclipse-Class-Superstardestroyers, Galaxy-Guns, Shadow-Droids, Imperial Sentinels, Sovereign-Protectors (as if the royal guard wouldn´t have been enough), Chrysalis-beasts and so on in one single story-arc.
So what? They wanted to show us a lot of new stuff. How is it any different from Palpatine in the movie era? He always built massive weapons and gizmos. What about Thrawn relying on wonderous gimmicks? Ysalamiri? Clones? A phantom fleet? A Dark Jedi Master who can control a whole fleet's worth of crewmen?
And the Galaxy Gun is semi-rediculous in my opinion. I barely stomach it, and I did not enjoy Dark Empire too, so the Chrysalis Beasts is out too.
Besides, the fact that it all boils down to Force Users duking it out touches back to a movie theme: "Do not be too proud of this technological terror you've constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the Force."
Not matter what machines Palpatine did, he couldn't defeat the lightside. This theme is spelled out in notes at the end of the Dark Empire Trade Paperback, so I don't know why I'm baby-feeding this to you.
FTeik wrote:My excuses for not liking Luke Skywalker turning to the dark Side, although he sucessfully resisted this temptation in RotJ.
"Once you start down the Dark Path, forever will it dominate your destiny."
Furthermore, you lost the whole damn point to Dark Empire. Luke didn't fall to the Dark Side. He knew Palpatine wanted a right-hand. Palpatine knew he wanted to sabotage the war and Palpatine's plans. It was a sacrifice and a trial for Luke, in the foot-steps of Ulic Qel-Droma. A contest of wills, that, with the help of the other Skywalker, Leia, he won.
The whole "oh God Luke fell to the Dark Side" is unfortunately the lazy minded interpretation of later works. Luke infiltrated the greatest evil to destroy it from within. He tested the boundaries of Light and Dark. He risked losing himself for the galaxy.
He willing went to Palpatine to try and destroy him. He succeeded where Qel-Droma failed.
FTeik wrote:When else have we ever seen so much darksider(-pussies) in one place (come on, most of them were really laughable).
I told you I didn't like Dark Empire II. It was unnecessary and corny. It was mediocre at best and crappy at worst.
FTeik wrote:And in nearly every other source we have, Palpatine is either running the show or manipulating things to his advantage. While being emperor he is the one pulling the strings of his underlings or (as a senator and chancellor) keeping an eye on everthing, that could be of interest to him. I somehow doubt he changed the habits, that allowed him to achive the position he is in.
Besides, with exception of the last issue i didn´t tried to prove the things seen or happening in DarkEmpire to be out of continuity or to be of no consequence for the SW-universe. I only explained, why i don´t like them and why i wouldn´t care, if DE would be declared un-official. But that is a question of taste.
Indeed on taste, though I have to say it is very harsh and judgemental on a work to say something like that. Zahn annoys me, but I'd never want to lose his works to SW.
And Palpatine was controlling everything. He controlled the fall of the Empire, he controlled Thrawn's demise, he controlled the Imperial Civil War, he tried to control Luke. Everything about Dark Empire was about Palpatine's attempt and failure to establish manipulation and control where he'd lost it. The confident and visionary evil genius of ROTJ is gone--replaced by a broken, vendictive, and deeply furious man with questionable sanity. Palpatine could never return to what he was. It was Luke's job, however, to finish what his father started, and put an end to the despot who refuses to die.
FTeik wrote:Why do you value a comment from Stent more, than one of Mara Jade.
Because Stent is PART of the Hand of Thrawn, and has lived and served out there. I think he has a better appreciation for the situation than the version that was given to her by two traitors just in desire to recruit her.
Did you really need me to tell you that? Jesus Christ. Dismissal of sources anyone?
FTeik wrote:[Especially if he was only trying to mock her? And what about Grodin Tierce quoting Thrawn himself that „ the hand of Thrawn would ensure the final victory of the empire“? Or that Parck and Fel were convinced, that Mara would join them, as soon as she had seen, whats going on in the unknown regions?
Because Parck and Fel are fanatics. They rant and rave on threats never seen or observed like Hitler screaming about Bolshevik hordes on the border. I'll trust a recruit who's been fighting like him than two Imperial officers who derelicted their duty to the Empire. You have yet to prove how he would be exaggerating, despite the fact that all the evidence suggests that anything that the Hand of Thrawn and the Chiss could fight off is no threat to the galaxy proper. You're cherry picking.
FTeik wrote:And what are the exact quotes from Gamer 5?
Is this confirmed by the chiss themself or just assumption on the side of the New Republic? Do they use navigational beacons instead of nav-computers because they don´t have the technology or because they want to keep their population and military under control?
Ugh don't give me this bullshit.
It is written in third-person omniscient perspective. It is. And who cares if they have the technology or not? Point is, their fleets do not have navicomputer capabilities. The why is irrelevent. If they purposely backward themselves, that's just idiotic. Though I suppose you think if they have navicomputers they can just refit the electronic systems on their ships whenever they want on the drop of a coin. Ask Skimmer about the realism of THAT.
The Inferiority of the Chiss Compared to the Galaxy Proper
I have got a problem...
NJO Question
FTeik wrote:According to the AotC:ICS the sector-fleets of Kuat and Corellia were also limited to their sectors by their hyperdrives and the TradeFederation, the office of the Chancellor and the Jedi were the only ones with exact maps of everything. Can´t they do better or is this by design.
So what? So they didn't fit their warships with hyperdrives that are unnecessary? What does that prove? So not everyone keeps maps of parts of the galaxy that are irrelevent to them. What is your point? We know massive-scale probe droid exploration is practical.
FTeik wrote:As for no ships bigger than a Strike-Cruiser for nearly two decades every warship build by the New Republic was smaller than one mile. Does this mean they don´t have the knowledge to build such ships, that they lack the resources and infrastructure or the political will?
Home One anyone? And I take WEG's lengths for Mon Cals with a grain of salt. ILM charts plugged Mon Cal sketches at 1 mile, and MC-80B and MC-90 vessels can stand up to 17.6 km Executor-class command ships, and since they're often depicted as massive battlecruisers and used a flagships, I wouldn't be suprised if they were in the neighborhood of the Home One length.
Needless to say, your point is irrelevent. We know it is political will with them, due to Mon Mothma's "no big ships" crap and wanting to scap any Executor they captured. Your assumption that is the case with the Chiss is irrelevent for two reasons. a) it is an assumption, and b) none of that changes the fact that their fleet is made of pathetically tiny vessels.
If they can build them and refuse, that just makes them morons. It isn't as if in a major war they will have much time to suddenly ramp up production of huge ships (from their 29-world military industrial complex) since it wouldn't take long for a major galactic power to overrun 29 worlds in short order.
FTeik wrote:If i remember correct, there are only several thousand stars. And nothing suggest, that it has vastly greater economic capacity or resources. The Yevethans have only 22 worlds and then there are a few spare populated colonies from outside. No vastly greater economic base. And nothing, that suggest, that those resources are exploited in grand style. If the Koornacht-Cluster would have been such a powerhouse, it would have been more difficult for the imperials to keep it secret or their activities there would have been bigger.
Why? A galaxy wide civilization hasn't had problems leaving enough to be exploited later for the civilization to still be stagnant in the modern era. The Deep Core was easily kept secret despite being a huge powerhouse. Globular clusters contain fewer post-helium elements, and are outside the galactic disk, making them more likely to be ignored.
Furthermore, thousands of stars is in itself vastly greater material resources than the Chiss. There
is known to be more stuff there than in Chiss Space, which is in the galactic halo.
FTeik wrote:One homeworld and twenty-nine colonies. Each guarded by a phalanx. (I don´t have the sources myself, i can only repeat, what i have read elsewhere). A population of five trillions (5*10^12 or 5*10^18?). How much of them serve as military and how much resources can you get from one planet?
Not as much as from thousands of star systems. And the Mining Guild had billions of chosen mining worlds.
And the American trillion is the one being used. I'm not really impressed by their population--its only a 2.5 hundred times larger than the Emperor's private retreat world. Its much smaller than Coruscant's population.
And I can tell you that most military forces in SW aren't very impressive based on single planets. Especially when they have only Strike Cruisers and no navicomputers.
Gamer 5 wrote:The heart of Chiss politics lies on Csilla, and in the four ruling families. At the House Palace in Csilla’s capital city of Csaplar can be found the Cabinet and Parliament. The 28 outlying Chiss colonies are represented in the Parliament by apointed governors, or House leaders.
There are 29 worlds, period.
FTeik wrote:400 Species on 11.000 worlds. And why do you think the rest of the galaxy is allied or a protectorate to it and not independent or otherwise on its own?
Since the New Republic had expeditions to the Outer Rim they must have at least had some presence out there.
I theorize that the New Republic at this period was composed of a small "core" of full members who totally give their soveriegnty to the NR, with the vast majority of the NR being protectorates and other semi-independent groups who raise their own militaries, and can request NR help. A federation-within-a-confederation if you will. It explains a lot of things--why so few members yet so much throw-weight for the NR? Why the New Republic had been able to defeat an Imperial incursion before and after the crisis, while so little seemed to be available with the Yevetha.
Either way, the NR clearly had more as of the NJO.
FTeik wrote:And even if, what you said doesn´t sound like a united front to me. Or the condition they are in HoT. At that time they were also still reeling from war and perhaps even at the time of the NJO.
I think my "core federation within a confederation" idea explains a lot. The New Republic has an odd-ball combo of central government and military attributes, and then has a lot of semi-independents and local fleets and militias.
FTeik wrote:Having read the corellian crisis just recently, yes there were political concerns, too. However, that doesn´t change the fact that they were stretched thin. Very thin. No wall of ships defending the galactic core and inner rim. And Ackbar needed nearly four weeks to gather a force of twenty-five capital ships for a crisis taking place in one system. And during the HoT-Duology the situation wasn´t changed and because of the peace-treaty the number of ships was even reduced. Reduced for heavens sake.
Ask Skimmer about military logistics and come back to me. The fleet was in moth-balls. But I suppose you want to throw out the Chronology too?
FTeik wrote:And? We have never seen 25,000 ISDs in one place so they don´t exist?
That's different. We had a standing officer of the military give a statement on the military's size.
This is actually made minimalist by both the Death Stars, the fact Palpatine threw a Sector Group just to pin the entire Rebellion in place and the Rebels were still outnumbered. Giel's armada in Marvel, Dark Empire fleets, etc.
Pelleaon's quote told us what always made sense in terms of the overall scale. It is impossible to "lose" a Sector in the middle of a spiral galaxy. Gamer and a strict interpretation of what we see in VoTF is totally consistent with a fleet in the mostly empty galactic halo.
But a hunch made by looking a the fact that a mapping mission had been completed that is actually contradicted by other evidence is evidently perfect logic to you and on par with Pelleaon's statement and supporting evidence. Since that is perfectly sensical to you, I have little to say.
FTeik wrote:According to your logic Thrawn would have mapped and conquered thirty-thousand starsystems with only a few gunboats, since those were the only ones we have seen in Vision of the Future. And since they wanted to lure Mara Jade into their clutches, do you think they would have placed an ISD over their fortress? Or an entire legion of Chiss in stormtrooper-armour, since there were so many hostile natives on Niraun?
They couldn't call one in afterward? It would've made perfect sense. Why was Nirauan so paralyzed by losing a hangar full of gunboats? Half-ass protection for Thrawn's last great hope?
No--I think that the mapping fleet was probably worth maybe a Death Squadron or two and he left some small outposts and alliances here and there. Red Sky Blue Flame doesn't show anything beyond Thrawn's destroyer. They were probably recalled either by Thrawn during his campiagn, or by Palpatine during his.
FTeik wrote:As for the fortress: Its material was said to be able to withstand the fire of the heaviest turbolasers
Evidence?
FTeik wrote:and we have never seen its defense-system used really intent on destroying. Do you really thing Parck and Fel wanted to kill Luke Skywalker and Mara Jade, even when they refused their „invitation“.
Besides, from the book i got the impression (given the conditon of the fortress, there was a touch of decay to it) that the stay of Parck and the others was only temporary (of course, this doesn´t fit with what other authors have made of it).
Yeah, it was permanent, even though the NEGTC says otherwise, and the same book indicates he'd had his information base with his clone for the last ten years. That's IN VOTF!
FTeik wrote:Concerning the milirary expertise: Crix Madine, Tycho Celchu, Arien Cracken and many others were also defectors and traitors to the empire.
So what? Does that change the fact that Thrawn's little cluster of loyal minions are traitors to either the Chiss (exiles; refused to be awknowledged by the ruling families--just like Thrawn) or to the Empire?
FTeik wrote:Does this tell us something about their character or their competence?
It tells me Thrawn built a movement out of fanatics who went traitor and live for him, according to Stent. Everything is for Thrawn, and you're telling me they're not fanatics?
FTeik wrote:And how do you know, if they were called to Palpatines banner or allowed to stay on their posts in the UR?
Because all Imperial forces were said to join Palpatine's war.
FTeik wrote:And even if they were called and didn´t respond, i say right so: A force-whielding lunatic like the emperor, who keeps vast forces hidden in the deep core and allows his empire to crumble for five years doesn´t deserve better
He purified the weak from the strong. And Palpatine is hardly a lunatic. He was Thrawn's superior and destroyed him.
And you're still skipping the fact. They're all fanatical traitors who want to support Thrawn's crusade to rule the galaxy.
FTeik wrote:We have several sources, including the ISB or the BFC, that the empire established shipyards in every sector it controlled. And even if there were only five or ten, that is still enough to build up sizeable forces over ten/twenty years.
More assumptions. Do you have any real evidence even though the Hand of Thrawn is castle filled with fanatics with hand guns and with a small cache of gunboats?
FTeik wrote:Not to forget Thrawn´s quote about the HoT ensuring the final victory of the empire.
Do you READ THE BOOK? It was the information in the Hand of Thrawn that was the key. And besides, it contained his clone--of course he thought it was the last hope of the Empire.
FTeik wrote:And even if Thrawn´s forces at their height consisted of only one augmented sectorfleet, that would still be more than 30,000 ships. Considering the empire doubeling its military forces between ANH and TESB, that is nothing.
I still see no evidence. And what difference would one augmented sector fleet make? It'd give the Imperial Remnant a little more wiggle room. Not much else though.
FTeik wrote:Logic. At least something has to be there to controll that much space.
Not really. We know from Force Heretic II that the Unknown Regions are part of the overall galaxy with only hundreds of thousands of stars. That volume if in the galaxy proper would contain 30 billion.
That's worse than a 1/30,000 star ratio between the Unknown Regions and a proportional percentage of the galactic disk.
Hell, the
entire Unknown Regions has worse than a 1/300 star ratio to the Chommel Sector, a lightly populated Mid Rim sector.
Let's not stop there. There are no more than 29 inhabited Chiss Worlds.
Rounded down, that is
one inhabited planet in the Chiss' sector, for every
one thousand, three-hundred, and eighty inhabited worlds in the Chommel Sector.
FTeik wrote:It might not be comparable to denser populated sectors of the galaxy if we go for ship per cubic-lightyear, but it should still be more, than you are willing to grant them. And more compared to several of those sectors during the first two decades of the NR.
I dunno. The numbers above are pretty damning.
FTeik wrote:It is unknown. We can´t be sure, if its underdeveloped, otherwise we would know. For all we know, the builders of the corellian system or other highly advanced civilisation could live there in happy, self-chosen isolation. But i´ll admit, that is nit-picking. And i never claimed they are as populated or industrialized as the core. I only asked to consider them to have a part of that abilities (with in official EU isn´t that much, too). And while i hate to quote Darksaber, the warlords of the resource-poor and artificially settled DeepCore were able to built sizeable fleets. Why not a force controlling thirty-thousand systems in the UR?
Because we saw the fleets, and they were left-overs recalled during Operation Shadow Hand, mostly. And where's the thirty thousand systems quote come from?
FTeik wrote:As for Thrawn not recalling those mapping-forces during his campeign: First he could still operate with one quater of the empire (the part he knew about), second, he wouldn´t have weakened his powerbase in the UR and as a third, he probabely couldn´t because there were still „unknown threats“ (that were suddenly dealt with at the time of DarkJourney.
Its directly stated that his primary mission was always the Chiss--if they had an immediate threat he was already putting them in danger by leaving. Therefore the threats had probably been fought aside at the moment. I don't imagine Thrawn leaving thousands of ships when he was so desperate to nab 200 dreadnoughts, and while Palpatine was still quietly syphoning off his forces.
FTeik wrote:The re-emurgance of Palpatine is another matter: It might be possible, that at the time of TTT it would have been right for Thrawn to say, that his HoT-forces would „ensure the final victory“ of the empire and this wouldn´t be the case, if they were called back one year later.
Yeah, because Thrawn's words are gospel and cannot be violated or the universe will self-destruct. Of COURSE he didn't know what was going to happen the next year. He was
fucking dead.
And for all of "Thrawn's predictions must be right" he certainly foresaw Palpatine returning, eh?
FTeik wrote:Besides that, how do you call a shipyard back? And if there were several colonies for the families of the imperial crewers of those ships, wouldn´t they have returned with their ships after Palpatine´s final death in EE?
What shipyards and what colonies? Deepdocks are by nature mobile, and Palpatine managed to move populations to the Deep Core without them even knowing where they were. Byss' inhabitants don't know they live in the Deep Core.
FTeik wrote:Absence of evidence isn´t evidence of absence (God, i like the sound of that).
Is that a creationist I here? You do not assume things exist without evidence to suggest such. Mara's Leap-in-logic notwithstanding. We don't give much credit to Trek characters that make stupid statements and illogical conclusions, so why Mara based on colored dots on a map. All that meant was those stars were cataloged.
FTeik wrote:Just that it is more than Mara´s hunch. And the last time i checked Gamer 5 was as official as any other EU-Source, nothing more.
Except there are no other concrete sources that support Mara's hunch. It is the exception to everything, to Red Sky Blue Flame (written by Zahn), to Gamer 5, etc.
The Chiss are backward racist communists in a tiny mostly empty part of the galaxy. The great threats and great fleets have never been heard from except for some pirates/raiders in and Thrawn's destroyer respectively in Zahn's own stories.